So the basic idea is this. In 1870 and 1871, congress created a corporation to administer DC, and outsourced the functions of government to it, essentially copying the constitution as a set of corporate bylaws overlaid over the original constitution. Gradually the government functions were transferred from the original authority of the states and to the outsourced corporation which had been established in England to operate in DC, and this process was accelerated with the creation of the federal reserve.
Here are the two best summaries I have read to describe how it occurred. Both have links to actual congressional records, placed in context with explanations. It's reading that requires attention, but we'll worth it if you want to dig.
First is teamlaw: http://teamlaw.net/Mythology-CorpUS.htm#dcoa1871
Second is Anna Von Reitz: https://mainerepublicemailreport.com/2021/01/16/misinformation-about-the-act-of-1871-is-an-ongoing-problem-part-2/
I personally think Trump is reconstituting the Old Republic even while he simultaneously devolved the Corp. as described by the first few entries in Patel Patriot's devolution series (https://www.devolution.link/), and that the upcoming financial crash will end up with any of the Corp's assets (like the military contracts and gear, national parks, territories, and of course DC itself) being transferred back to the Old Republic. I don't actually know that's what he's doing, but devolution is extremely well documented, and it seems to dovetail well with the impending bankruptcy of the federal reserve. And there were a number of interesting meetings between Trump and state legislators (no other president that I know of has reached out to state assembly members that I can remember) that I heard about in the news between Nov 2020 and Jan 2021.
Anyway, after a comment in a different post, I thought it was worth posting some of the more readable links regarding the whole "what's up with the 1871 Corp?" topic.
If anybody has real info on those meetings with state assemblies, and I don't mean the Rudy Giuliani & Jenna Ellis presentations but rather the Trump - state legislator direct meetings that I only heard about, I'd be interested. I'll be offline for a bit but will check the thread later. Cheers.
I am starting to wonder about the Moor and Sovereign citizen stuff is making the rounds more and more these few last years. I worry this stuff pushed on youtube and the likes on a citizen level are either to latch this onto the posted idea to make it all a conspiracy theory together. Or, does it have merit and by making anyone who talks about it look insane cause an instant dismal of by everyone to be conditioned to never go along with it if true.
Everything valid is also surrounded by disinfo ops. That's how they keep control of the narrative--- they infiltrate and then lead astray. That's the Alex Jones model- enough truth to reel you in, and then they throw in the lizard people into the next podcast right after you told your good friend to listen. There's plenty of booby traps if you just start googling it.
But these links are straightforward.
Even so, it's all kind of academic. Even if it's totally true, which I think it is, Trump & team may have simply decided on a different path. I think it's a strong possibility, blending bits of devolution and the "president in exile" theory by another substack writer.
There are definitely paid shills that use classic shill tactics (Gentleman's Guide to Forum Spies) to detract those who are trying to learn about this 1871 stuff.
The Alex Jones model is a great way to put it. I just dont have enough time in the day to research and find enough truthful info to trust with so many things going on. But I guess the first step is understanding this process.
If it's the path that Trump & team have chosen, they'll have some good educational material already prepped. Trump sharing that morning show from Britain was just a drip. If it's real, we'll see more and more until we're swimming in it.
There’s no such thing as a sovereign citizen, it’s an oxymoron term made up by the media. You can’t be sovereign and a citizen at the same time.
Says who? Doesn't appear that's what the Founders thought about it at all.
Any Citizen of this nation, by right and dint of being born American, is sovereign over themselves and their property. Those "in government" were always meant to be subservient to those they represent. The People's voice was meant to rule all.
That unique perspective is what makes America and the way this nation was founded, very exceptional in the world. There's no other place like this on Earth.
True definition of freedom right there