Have you perhaps ever read or watched Judy Wood's "Where did the Towers go?" lecture/presentation? I think it is a great example of how far the tech was even back in 2001
Of course, that would require the normie to actually sit and listen to her 1.5-2 hour full presentation! haha
Although I have been able to get several people in my life to watch/read about it, and they have been thoroughly convinced there's more to the funniness that simple controlled demo
In the end, it was a few things at least, a show of force (not only of the tech, but of the media mind control the people in power had over "their" people), a coverup of missing money, a "reason" to invade iraq, a reason to step up TSA & general spying (patriot act), and so on
Amazing book that red pilled me on 9-11 astonishingly detailed research by a woman with a Ph.D. in Materials science who worked as a forensic metallurgist.
Amazes me how she is ignored because people just don't like her conclusions.
Also some good interviews with her on Richplanet.net
twin towers weren't melted by lasers, stop smoking crack. that narrative showed up everywhere to keep people from doing actual research, and apparently it worked on some.
what type of explosives in controlled demolition can completely powder-ify the entire building? yet paper was not affected, as seen on the ground? why were all of the cars touched by the dust charred and burned as if they'd been exposed to magma or intense heat? why didn't the building register on the richter scale at the an appropriate level for that amount of mass hitting the ground? how did the teams of firefighters survive a controlled demolition on the second floor with that much mass coming down? what was up with the geomagnetic field up to and then sharply after the event?
Literally the same thing was said about the demolition theory. I’m not the one making the claim either way. I prescribe to the demolition theory but I do find it suspect that the “art students” taking photos with fuse holder boxes is just a bit convenient. You have your opinion and other people have theirs. Do research and stop being retarded.
No it was military grade nano thermite.
As this video has the scientists that found its particulates in debris and air samples.
https://youtu.be/l0Q5eZhCPuc
Nano thermite liquify stell and burns underwater. Both of those events took place at ground zero.
This man did excellent work.
WTC is my specialty. WTC didn't turn into dust... you're seeing the fireproofing materials, which literally are dust, basically, that was sprayed onto the towers. Tower 1 was 40% completed when they decided to go back and fireproof it, the rest of the towers they fireproofed as it went away. Also, the dust was the concrete floors. Each floor was a truss, then plates of corrugated steel, then they poured concrete, about eight inches thick. That's where the dust came from.
Theres plenty of evidence to point to military grade nano thermite being used along w traditional demo techniques. There was an excellent documentary I posted I had watched before Q ever dropped. Couple that w cgi 5g tech. Caravans of white unmarked panel vans going into wtc around 1 am pulling out at 530 am for several nights prior to 9/11. The elevator construction w armed guards. That thermite shows up in debris and air samples. Melted steel can be seen running out of impact area in news video. The ex worked the pile..there was molten steel running down escalators steps and it burned underwater as seen from satellite for days...all nano thermite abilities.
We have to dig on Maui n dews. Because it all ties in it all matters. Saw another video yesterday on truth of a young woman who lived through it. Says thousands are dead..and it wasn't natural.
This is part of the war on humanity. If not us then who?
Incorrect.
This is the video I was referring to on my previous comment. Its 8 years old. But it is extremely well done and has a lot thst flew under peoples radar
Actually, the towers were demo'd by nuclear charges focused by magnetic lensing (hence the BB-8 photo). Look at John Prager's work. The USGS testing continued (they forgot to tell them) and they found cesium, all kinds of tell-tale nuclear signals.
Have you perhaps ever read or watched Judy Wood's "Where did the Towers go?" lecture/presentation? I think it is a great example of how far the tech was even back in 2001
There’s an actual news video from earlier this year about China running a test in / in Maui. But no assumptions made.
https://www.khon2.com/local-news/chinese-satellite-lasers-recorded-over-hawaii/amp/
Would love a link
I couldn’t add link in this reply so I added in original post.
Yep I’ve seen it. To even the normie, the information she presents should make them ask questions even if they don’t prescribe to focused energy.
Of course, that would require the normie to actually sit and listen to her 1.5-2 hour full presentation! haha
Although I have been able to get several people in my life to watch/read about it, and they have been thoroughly convinced there's more to the funniness that simple controlled demo
In the end, it was a few things at least, a show of force (not only of the tech, but of the media mind control the people in power had over "their" people), a coverup of missing money, a "reason" to invade iraq, a reason to step up TSA & general spying (patriot act), and so on
Melted steel/bible anyone?
Amazing book that red pilled me on 9-11 astonishingly detailed research by a woman with a Ph.D. in Materials science who worked as a forensic metallurgist. Amazes me how she is ignored because people just don't like her conclusions. Also some good interviews with her on Richplanet.net
Stop right there. DEWs behind 9-11 is a rumor spread by the CIA. the towers clearly underwent a fairly standard demolition.
actual 9-11 digs: https://www.bitchute.com/video/mYQtQySldxyz/
https://www.bitchute.com/video/2ynY9D0sfusP/
Funny, same point was made about the demolition theory
twin towers weren't melted by lasers, stop smoking crack. that narrative showed up everywhere to keep people from doing actual research, and apparently it worked on some.
what type of explosives in controlled demolition can completely powder-ify the entire building? yet paper was not affected, as seen on the ground? why were all of the cars touched by the dust charred and burned as if they'd been exposed to magma or intense heat? why didn't the building register on the richter scale at the an appropriate level for that amount of mass hitting the ground? how did the teams of firefighters survive a controlled demolition on the second floor with that much mass coming down? what was up with the geomagnetic field up to and then sharply after the event?
Literally the same thing was said about the demolition theory. I’m not the one making the claim either way. I prescribe to the demolition theory but I do find it suspect that the “art students” taking photos with fuse holder boxes is just a bit convenient. You have your opinion and other people have theirs. Do research and stop being retarded.
No it was military grade nano thermite. As this video has the scientists that found its particulates in debris and air samples. https://youtu.be/l0Q5eZhCPuc
Nano thermite liquify stell and burns underwater. Both of those events took place at ground zero. This man did excellent work.
OK. Then how do you explain the dustification of the towers? Not just concrete, also strucural steel.
high heat explosives. for god's sake man, it literally looks like any other controlled demolition. designed to leave no footprint.
You should watch the video. i seen structural steel, just fade away in midair.
WTC is my specialty. WTC didn't turn into dust... you're seeing the fireproofing materials, which literally are dust, basically, that was sprayed onto the towers. Tower 1 was 40% completed when they decided to go back and fireproof it, the rest of the towers they fireproofed as it went away. Also, the dust was the concrete floors. Each floor was a truss, then plates of corrugated steel, then they poured concrete, about eight inches thick. That's where the dust came from.
Nope. I've seen video of vertical steel members, just turn to dust and fall away. I've also seen the same phenomenon, captured in still photos.
Theres plenty of evidence to point to military grade nano thermite being used along w traditional demo techniques. There was an excellent documentary I posted I had watched before Q ever dropped. Couple that w cgi 5g tech. Caravans of white unmarked panel vans going into wtc around 1 am pulling out at 530 am for several nights prior to 9/11. The elevator construction w armed guards. That thermite shows up in debris and air samples. Melted steel can be seen running out of impact area in news video. The ex worked the pile..there was molten steel running down escalators steps and it burned underwater as seen from satellite for days...all nano thermite abilities. We have to dig on Maui n dews. Because it all ties in it all matters. Saw another video yesterday on truth of a young woman who lived through it. Says thousands are dead..and it wasn't natural. This is part of the war on humanity. If not us then who?
Incorrect. This is the video I was referring to on my previous comment. Its 8 years old. But it is extremely well done and has a lot thst flew under peoples radar
https://youtu.be/l0Q5eZhCPuc
Actually, the towers were demo'd by nuclear charges focused by magnetic lensing (hence the BB-8 photo). Look at John Prager's work. The USGS testing continued (they forgot to tell them) and they found cesium, all kinds of tell-tale nuclear signals.