I'm sorry but why do they need to comprehend it? Why does there need to be precedent? If they can willy nilly arrest Trump, why can't we willy nilly arrest Hillary or Barry?
You totally could arrest them if you had proof of a crime, which in the case of those two is certain
There are two ideas that Q followers seem to confuse for the sake of hopium, one being the need for precedent to arrest former elected officials, and the other is needing to already be in court to "introduce evidence"
Both are wrong. Trump can "introduce evidence" until the cows come home during his trials but the evidence already exists and no court will hear it. "Setting precedent" makes no sense when there's no need to set it
I get both sides of this or at least think I do. The libs who have been brainwashed for their entire life specifically the last 6 years of pure orange man bad will never believe he is telling the truth about anything which is a double edged sword because there is no guarantee they will believe it when it comes out even after he is arrested. Its like, if you caught them all and have all the evidence drop it out there and force the military to take action in the public eye since there would be zero doubt DOJ, FBI, ATF, etc all wont do anything. But by him going through all this they cant cry dictator going after political opponents etc later. Its like taking a cut in a knife fight to get in there to finish it vs sitting back and hoping your knife throw does the job or you are there weaponless now.
I'm sorry but why do they need to comprehend it? Why does there need to be precedent? If they can willy nilly arrest Trump, why can't we willy nilly arrest Hillary or Barry?
You totally could arrest them if you had proof of a crime, which in the case of those two is certain
There are two ideas that Q followers seem to confuse for the sake of hopium, one being the need for precedent to arrest former elected officials, and the other is needing to already be in court to "introduce evidence"
Both are wrong. Trump can "introduce evidence" until the cows come home during his trials but the evidence already exists and no court will hear it. "Setting precedent" makes no sense when there's no need to set it
I get both sides of this or at least think I do. The libs who have been brainwashed for their entire life specifically the last 6 years of pure orange man bad will never believe he is telling the truth about anything which is a double edged sword because there is no guarantee they will believe it when it comes out even after he is arrested. Its like, if you caught them all and have all the evidence drop it out there and force the military to take action in the public eye since there would be zero doubt DOJ, FBI, ATF, etc all wont do anything. But by him going through all this they cant cry dictator going after political opponents etc later. Its like taking a cut in a knife fight to get in there to finish it vs sitting back and hoping your knife throw does the job or you are there weaponless now.
Well... They can and they absolutely will.
Yup. Which is why I don’t care what they think. I truly believe there is a 20% of the population that cannot be saved.
My guess is to avoid mass riots and chaotic unrest.