Salty Cracker and Wall Street Apes are now insinuating it. The op was a success, they've created a narrative binary where either space lasers did it or climate change (MSM narrative) did it. Meanwhile the much more likely story (strategic arson ahead of high winds + collusion with crooked state and local officials to mishandle the response on purpose) has effectively been shoved under the rug. Now instead of having the entire internet digging into that to possibly find some arsonists or conspiracies to mishandle response, they are instead "laser focused" on space lasers.
Of course, if the DEW theory is correct, this is fine. I just don't think it is.
endrant
I know they've been heating the atmosphere with HAARP and probably have more advanced systems now, but I'm still going with Occam's Razor on these fires. It just seems easier for them in my opinion. You'd have to have some camera somewhere that captures a structure "spontaneously combusting" from a laser
The ionosphere is not the troposphere. There is no thermal connection.
remember the satellite footage of canada.... widespread fires, all starting at the exact same time.
bunch of arsonists camped all over the bush, looking at the second hand on their watches?
occams razor says no...
The smoke would follow the wind, so if the entire area was under a single current of wind, the smoke would reach that atmospheric height around the same time regardless of how long the fire had been going, resulting in an inaccurate picture of the fires "starting". Also yes, to achieve fire synergy and cause max damage I'd say lighting them all at the same time (say, 3pm everybody lights) would make sense. But there's no way to exactly pinpoint each fire's start time based on smoke which reaches such a height to be seen by sat
edit- your point is valid though, and one of the things that does give me pause on my stance against DEW narrative
Don't be silly. Bunch of arsonists, with cell phones, waiting for the "start" message? Or even looking at their clock. Occam's Razor says, too easy. When you think super-technology is the way to go, it only shows that you have no idea how to organize something, and nobody to count on. As a result, you think whoever is responsible for this is as feeble and ineffectual as you are---but the reality is that they will go to great lengths to accomplish their intent, if it takes time, people, and resources to do it. How to you propose to beat these people?
Or bunch of arsonists with remote controlled firestarters.
You're a real dedicated DEW DEW Head if you think space lasers is a simpler explanation than arsonists with synchronized watches or pre-placed bombs detonated via radio.