Salty Cracker and Wall Street Apes are now insinuating it. The op was a success, they've created a narrative binary where either space lasers did it or climate change (MSM narrative) did it. Meanwhile the much more likely story (strategic arson ahead of high winds + collusion with crooked state and local officials to mishandle the response on purpose) has effectively been shoved under the rug. Now instead of having the entire internet digging into that to possibly find some arsonists or conspiracies to mishandle response, they are instead "laser focused" on space lasers.
Of course, if the DEW theory is correct, this is fine. I just don't think it is.
endrant
Excellent report. It is a predictable trap that needs to be recognized. It really doesn't matter if it was 'space-age' DEWs or not. It boils down to the believability factor. And it's obvious to me, in regards to the public believing it...., it becomes too high of a mountain to climb. How many Americans are going to believe it? I've said it before and I'll say it again. There's no doubt in my mind that the technology exists and is available. However, the problem that always remains is whether the greater public believes it. IMHO, the believability factor is on par with getting people to believe in alien abductions. We are in a PsyOp war with the DS an our government. The government always uses 'plausible deniability', and just like with the many reported UFO encounters, they will call anyone a 'crackpot' for bringing up the subject. Alex Jones got mocked and discredited for the 'frogs turning gay' statement, which actually has some truth to it and came from an accredited scientific study on Atrazine that was running off into the water shed and were "turning frogs gay". Even Wikipedia cites this as being true.
The point I'm making here is It’s much easier to fool people than to convince them that they’ve been fooled. Or in this case, it's much easier to LIE to people than to convince them they've been LIED to.
It's always best to keep it simple. There's no need to get into the details. Just point out what is most obvious to everyone:
Fire prevention practices throughout the Lahaina area were purposely neglected and previously abandoned.
The fires in Maui were purposely set.
The water was turned off.
No fire fighting units were dispatched to prevent the fires from descending into the city.
The roads were blocked by the police preventing people from escaping in their vehicles when the conflagration rapidly approached.
Over a thousand people died as a result.
The cover-up has become blatantly obvious.
And Why won't the officials mention any word about all the missing children?
Sometimes explaining DEW is as easy as sharing the Wikipedia link:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Boeing_YAL-1#/media/File:Airbornelaserturret.jpg
… and asking simple question: ”What is this laser designed for?”
From ground mounted laser to space satellite reflector back to ground.
That is hilarious. It makes no optical sense whatsoever. The targeting image would have to go up to the satellite and down to the laser. You need to have two separate telescope systems on the satellite to pass the beam two ways, with large apertures. (I did a system analysis of this architecture a long time ago.) And how long do you think such a satellite would be in position to exploit the geometry before it passes over the horizon? And we still don't have any sensors that can differentiate ground targets....unless you want television. Will you know what you are looking at? You are just compounding the absurdity by invoking an order of magnitude more complexity and expense.