I totally agree. My own personal scientific opinion is that Trump commands about 95% approval from his voters. No real supporter of Trump would have given any ratings to Fox whatsoever, especially since they called AX early election night which triggered all the battleground states to stop counting.
So that leave a total of 4,050,000 people (5% of 81 million) that support any of the clowns on the stage last night. No way 100% of them tuned in. 50% would be a lot.
So I think the actual viewership was closer to 2,000,000.
Just my wild ass guess.
One thing I know for sure is the RNC crashed and burned like the Hindenberg when compared to Trump/Tucker.
And don't forget that TV ratings are bullshit. They only track what a small number of people watch, and then extrapolate that to the whole country.
Around 20,000 households are included in a "representative" sample for the national ratings estimates. That's out of a very rough estimate of 121 million homes for a sample size of 0.000165%
And then of course you just have to take their word for it that there's no manipulation on top of that.
There's no way it got 12.8
I totally agree. My own personal scientific opinion is that Trump commands about 95% approval from his voters. No real supporter of Trump would have given any ratings to Fox whatsoever, especially since they called AX early election night which triggered all the battleground states to stop counting.
So that leave a total of 4,050,000 people (5% of 81 million) that support any of the clowns on the stage last night. No way 100% of them tuned in. 50% would be a lot.
So I think the actual viewership was closer to 2,000,000.
Just my wild ass guess.
One thing I know for sure is the RNC crashed and burned like the Hindenberg when compared to Trump/Tucker.
I think that's much more realistic.
And those watching were brain dead republicans or curious democrats, anyone else with half a lick of sense was watching Trump and Tucker.
They're confusing the viewing numbers with the 2020 election results.
Fox misspelled Wupped
And don't forget that TV ratings are bullshit. They only track what a small number of people watch, and then extrapolate that to the whole country.
Around 20,000 households are included in a "representative" sample for the national ratings estimates. That's out of a very rough estimate of 121 million homes for a sample size of 0.000165%
And then of course you just have to take their word for it that there's no manipulation on top of that.
I totally agree. Same with radio ratings. All designed to suck money out of clueless advertisers. Pissing money into the ether.
Computer simulation count. Just like temperatures from NOAA.