* THE COUNTRY YOU GREW UP IN NO LONGER EXISTS. *
(media.patriots.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
The country you grew up in never existed. It was just a more complete illusion then.
Well, there weren't a zillion homeless drug addicts pooping on the streets in big cities and stealing retailers blind; there were plenty of morally decent and Constitutionally aware people in local (and some in the state and federal) government; our borders were not being overrun with criminals and military-age males from nations that hate us -- and so on.
I do see your point -- corruption and evil in high places is nothing new and America was always infested with psychopaths and Satanists -- but having lived in the US during the 1950s and '60s (and continuing on to today) I can say that a free, prosperous, and largely moral and sane America was a lot less of an illusion than it is now. The imperfections of the second half of 20th century America were minor compared to what we have now.
" I can say that a free, prosperous, and largely moral and sane America was a lot less of an illusion than it is now."
Agree 100%, Narq. I was there, and saw it for myself.
This is a relative term. I suggest "proper morals" have only to do with respecting others individuals rights (not desires, but rights), not on the personal choices you make for your own way of living yours.
So... I don't really agree with this. There was just as much infringement of other's rights in the past as there is today. In fact most of them haven't changed a whit.
The Constitution IS the Illusion. It is the greatest illusion there is. That you would suggest "Constitutional awareness" (in the positive sense) as being a "better" thing proves the problem from my perspective. People need to learn that the Construction is a fraud. THAT is the necessary Constitutional awareness. There are probably more people who understand that now than before (though still far too few), but I suggest that's a step in the right direction.
Meh, there was plenty of criminal activity happening between countries, most run by the C_A or the mafia (which are just different doors to the same organization). It's just more "in your face" now.
On the contrary, the illusion was more complete then. Now, it is in your face because it is crumbling. Back then, it was hidden. People believed they were "free." They weren't. They weren't even close. What they had were a thousand paths they could choose, every single one of those paths created and controlled by the same entity. A thousand contrived paths gives the illusion of freedom.
If you put a rat in a big enough cage and teach it to believe the walls are just a conspiracy theory, it believes it is free, and it will fight and kill for its slavemasters to protect that freedom.
I agree with you about the Constitution; I'm an Abolitionist as I've described in numerous comments here. But since we don't HAVE a fully civil society, and never have here in America, it is critically important to have members of the political class who are aware of, understand, and FOLLOW the restrictions of the Constitution: they are a critical bulwark against tyranny. Rules and laws mean nothing if they are not known and followed.
I don't know if you have read my response to this yet, but I gave the wrong link in my original response. Here is the correct link (also fixed in the original post).
I get what you are saying, and as a "stop gap" I kinda agree, but the Constitution is tyranny from it's inception, and suggesting we follow it helps to perpetuate the fraud. The Constitution is designed to set up a ruling class of people, and relegates the rest to slavery. It does this not just by actually doing that ("The Republic" was very restrictive, allowing only the upper crust men to participate by law, and ensuring only the Aristocrats would hold the highest office in practice), but more importantly, the Constitution makes explicit claims on the individuals jurisdiction. "Rules and Laws" are tyranny if they make claims on the individuals jurisdiction. That's basically the definition of tyranny. And our system is designed with that purpose in mind. Our very concept of law is designed to lead us to tyranny. "Law" as we understand the term was created by the Cabal. It is our concept of what "rule" and "Law" is, that is the root of their control system.
"Law" is more correctly called Law Magic, and they created it around the same time that they created Money Magic, for the same purpose; control.
Please see my argument here. It is unfortunately the end of a long discussion, so the full context is missing in just that one post, but to follow the whole thing would take a while, and I think that response is sufficiently self contained to make sense. At some point I will write the whole argument up formally, with all of the evidence on what "Law" really is, and how it is fundamentally and intentionally flawed.
The Constitution of the United States of America isn't the fraud. The Constitution of THE United States is. The CORPORATE Constitution, followed up by/with the U.S. Code.
The ORIGINAL Constitution, a long with the Bill of Rights sets forth the official acknowledgement of the sovereignty of the individual over and above the sovereignty of a collective national government. It also officially acknowledges that God is the supreme sovereign while also disavowing the fraud of a leader being chosen as God's representative over The People.
The Constitution ALSO sets forth the idea of a limited government ONLY being in charge of and responsible for itself.
The 1871 Constitution and the massively garagntuan (sp?) U.S. Code that followed with it's millions of pages of admiralty law legal mumbo jumbo effectively threw everything on its head and is the cause of all this upheaval. Those two items have allowed for "manifest destiny," never ending wars, the so-called legal social wars like "The war on drugs," "the war on poverty," "the war on terror," etc.
They've also allowed for the steady and increasing monopolization of every industry man has created, as well as the destruction of our environment in the name of such ideas like "climate change," "globalization," and the social constructs of the transgender movements. And you can lump in the advent of the global Fascii-Communo-Socialism movement we have today. That evil conglomeration would'nt have been possible, and Marx would never have been successful in spreading this ideology, without the subversion of the original document and the subsequent 1871 revisions to the Constitution of the United States of America.
It wasn't until after that revision that we saw the rise of the so-called "secret government" along with the rise of the nanny state with its alphabet soup of agencies like the FBI, USSS, CIA, DOD, EPA, USDA, IRS, and especially tje "Federal" Reserve. The size of our federal govt was extremely limited, so was it's scope of power over The People before 1871. Without that revision, and the addition and invention of the current iteration of the U.S. Code, the Federal Reserve Act wasn't even possible.
Looking back on it, I believe the Deep State engineered the ultimate trap and coup against The People: the U.S. Civil War. [they] laid a well organized and deeply seeded trap for Lincoln that he was well aware of but knew he couldn't avoid. And the only way to really avoid a trap isn't by walking around it. You have to spring the trap and then go after the people who laid it. Which was why he was assassinated. He was successful in springing that trap and disarming [their] power to a point the only recourse [they] had ledt at [their] disposal was his assassination.
The same goes for JFK, Sr and his brother.
And now we have history playing out in a similar manner with DJT and RFK, Jr. Only this time, both are well insulated from physical attack.
I only hope that continues to be the case moving forward because both men are know they're the most visible targets [they] have to eliminate in order to complete the current coup against The People.
There are two problems with this statement.
From Blacks Law Dictionary:
A corporation is a legal entity (AKA legal person) that has been incorporated (made corporeal, i.e. made "real" with respect to Law) that acts as a legal shield between the Natural Persons that make the decisions ("Trustees" or "Directors") in the name of the corporation (legal person), and the consequences of the decisions themselves.
This "legal shield" (relating only to our concept of "consequences of Law") is the purpose of all corporate entities, whether they be LLCs, Trusts, 501(3)(c)s, municipal corporations, governmental corporations, etc..
The US Govt was a governmental corporation that was incorporated (made into a legal entity, that can sue or be sued and acts as a legal shield) by the Constitution. The entire purpose of the Constitution was to create that Corporation. That is what "Constitution" means.
That will be elaborated below (especially in the link below).
This is not what the original Constitution did. On the contrary, it did the opposite. Please see the first couple parts of this response here which elaborates this reasonably well. I have so many posts on this, I really need to put them all in one place and make a formal post so I can more coherently address this common misapprehension of what the Constitution really did (from a legal perspective).
The Organic Act of 1871 created the municipality of DC. The CEO and the Board of Trustees of that municipality happen to be the President and the Senate/House of the US Govt, and there may be some fuckery there, but if there is, it isn't the major fuckery because it isn’t necessary. The original Constitution had all the required fuckery built in (please see link above).
Incorrect, this was set up by the 1787 Constitution. “Manifest Destiny” of the US had been an ongoing process from before the Declaration of Independence. These ideas had been inherited from Britain, where most of the Founding Fathers were either Dutch or British Aristocrats, working under the Corporate Law system set up to ensure the ideas of Manifest Destiny would be inherited. This idea was formally laid out in the Monroe Doctrine in 1823. The mandatory participation in the military all but ensured that “endless wars” would happen, the fifth amendment nails the coffin shut (please see previous link to understand that sentence). No further fuckery was required. Our “endless wars” were there from the very beginning. Just look at all the wars that occurred. Look at the Opium Wars (both of them) if you think this was a “post 1871” thing. There are many more examples, but that one so easily puts to rest the ideas that the "corporate monopolies" or the "manifest destiny" things were begun after 1871 that I choose to point you in that direction.
Please see my report here. The system was designed to ensure that would happen from the get go. It was actually completely in place in America before 1787. In fact, the “monopolization” was already in place by the 1600s. The CURRENT system wasn’t created until the 1860s, and it wasn’t fully formed until the 1880s, but the system of full monopolization of all industry was already accomplished by 1600(ish). And really, it has been for thousands of years. The Aristocracy have always been in control of all industry, and the bankers have always controlled the Aristocracy and their industries, ever since there has been what we call “civilization.”
“Climate Change” and “Transgender” are concepts that have cycled through history for hundreds of years. This is just the latest iteration. It is part of the social cycle, the Hegelian Dialectic (or Kantian, or Marxian if you prefer) that has been running for centuries. Really it’s been running for millennia, but it’s been formalized more recently, with a singular goal in mind. It functions by creating two sides at each step (controlled opposition) which leads the the "Synthesis," a preplanned event that comes from the "conflict" (contrived) by the "two sides" in the dialectic. This dialectic has had total control of all the world for a few centuries. Look into the happenings in Europe, America ("Roaring Twenties"), and especially Germany in the 1920s. It was exactly what is happening here today. Why? Because it destabilizes and divides society.
This is completely incorrect on all counts. I will elaborate this in great, painstaking detail in the next section of my report (coming soon). There is too much to go over here, but one has nothing to do with the other. To be brief, the original Constitution, and specifically the First Amendment, was the primary tool used to make it happen, at least as it influenced America.
Yes, all these things happened after 1871 (though not really, but all of those enterprises were expanded after that). That is because the Rockefeller family had solidified its grip on all industry by then, and turned their money and time to creating all of those agencies. The Rockefellers created every single one of them, and that effort had exactly ZERO to do with “The 1871 Organic Act” that created the municipality of DC.
Please read my report to understand how it happened.
It had been extended from its origins from day one. It was purposefully designed to be extended from day one. The largest extension of powers of the US Govt came with the actions of Lincoln, who ensured a complete destruction of States Rights, along with a forever debt to the banks.
My investigation into Lincoln suggests something very different. I don’t know anything for sure, but I’m fairly certain Lincoln was acting on behalf of the Cabal the entire time, an agent of opposition. Justifying that takes a lot of work, but there is a ton of evidence to support it. I’m not even convinced he was assassinated at all. Every single person involved was an actor (not just Booth), they all had ties to each other and the Cabal, Lincoln's son was absolutely an agent of the Cabal, and almost certainly involved in every “assassination” (real or otherwise) of every single president (except JFK of course), so was Edwin Booth (brother of John Wilkes Booth). So was the coroner who examined Lincoln. Meh, there is so much there, to elaborate that is a huge endeavor. Maybe someday I will write it up.
That may be what happened with JFK, but I’m fairly confident it was not what happened with Lincoln.
Good point