She said in a recent interview that she sometimes gets asked to be on shows by people she really hates even listening, but she has to somehow manage to sit through and get her message out since thats the real goal here. I am assuming Charlie is one of them.
(When I heard her say it, I was thinking - darn, she is gonna make a bunch of people angry - but also kekked hard)
She speaks of Charlie when she was interviewed by Nino in a way that makes you think she's not at all opposed to him. In the same interview she says she gets the requests you mention.
She also parrots exactly what Charlie said two years ago about "650 planeloads of gold"
search - vatican-pedophile-network-closed-as-gold-repatriated-to-us-treasury at search.brave.com
She also parrots exactly what Charlie said two years ago about "650 planeloads of gold"
If we are not careful we will be like those people who say "SOF parrots exactly what QAnon has been saying and hence must be wrong"
I personally stopped judging people and just analyse the message. Whatever we think of Charlie, is not hard to believe that much good was stolen from us and obtained back under Trump.
I mean, we already say "the media reports this so its probably wrong" as it is.
Charlie is someone who was very wrong often, so why would I listen to someone who repeats what he says?
Q teaches us to do research on our own, not just blindly taking what people say at face value just because we're desperate to fit it into our narrative of "patriots in control" (they are). If it can't be proven, then we should absolutely be careful with the information given. Few people will wake up if we feed them bunk even only 25% of the time.
edit: and let me remind that people like Charlie pretend that they are in contact with Trump and team and working with them closely.
It wasn't as outlandish as I remember Ward being in the past (it's been probably 2'ish years since I've seen anything from him).
I'm not sure what to make of it.
In all of the interviews I've watched with her recently - she's always seemingly looking for the "best" in a person and ignoring the other things.
Just working this thought out here - but, is it possible she's encouraging Ward because he IS a person that has energy to chase after truth - even if he's not always right - and even if his personality leads him to bad choices sometimes...
Analyzing the things he says in just this one video - he's not saying anything I haven't read on these boards a million times. I would consider nearly all of his statements in this vid "Mainstream" in relation to the content we talk about here.
And I think that's what Jan encourages - because it's his attitude and energy that is useful to the "truther" movement - not his accuracy.
Does that make sense?
Now, I'm not advocating for liars - and the last time I'd watched anything from him, I slightly remember stuff about med-beds and underground (literally) societies/alien people, etc.....
If he's wrong about that stuff - but right about everything he said here in this vid - and the content in this one vid inspires people to pursue truth and feel not isolated...
Does it matter if he's wrong about med beds?
Or is the listener wrong because they're operating in a "feed me" sort of way, without any of their own discernment activity to know the difference?
Gotta say...be careful with her. She's aligned with Charlie Ward and has been for a while. This is from 4 days ago.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/BL1oWDYOo48G/
She said in a recent interview that she sometimes gets asked to be on shows by people she really hates even listening, but she has to somehow manage to sit through and get her message out since thats the real goal here. I am assuming Charlie is one of them.
(When I heard her say it, I was thinking - darn, she is gonna make a bunch of people angry - but also kekked hard)
She speaks of Charlie when she was interviewed by Nino in a way that makes you think she's not at all opposed to him. In the same interview she says she gets the requests you mention.
She also parrots exactly what Charlie said two years ago about "650 planeloads of gold"
search - vatican-pedophile-network-closed-as-gold-repatriated-to-us-treasury at search.brave.com
Check the dates
If we are not careful we will be like those people who say "SOF parrots exactly what QAnon has been saying and hence must be wrong"
I personally stopped judging people and just analyse the message. Whatever we think of Charlie, is not hard to believe that much good was stolen from us and obtained back under Trump.
What did Q say about good and fed again?
I mean, we already say "the media reports this so its probably wrong" as it is.
Charlie is someone who was very wrong often, so why would I listen to someone who repeats what he says?
Q teaches us to do research on our own, not just blindly taking what people say at face value just because we're desperate to fit it into our narrative of "patriots in control" (they are). If it can't be proven, then we should absolutely be careful with the information given. Few people will wake up if we feed them bunk even only 25% of the time.
edit: and let me remind that people like Charlie pretend that they are in contact with Trump and team and working with them closely.
signal not noise - i understand u/bubble_bursts/
Uggggh I’m gonna kekkkkkkkk!
Just watched this whole vid.
It wasn't as outlandish as I remember Ward being in the past (it's been probably 2'ish years since I've seen anything from him).
I'm not sure what to make of it.
In all of the interviews I've watched with her recently - she's always seemingly looking for the "best" in a person and ignoring the other things.
Just working this thought out here - but, is it possible she's encouraging Ward because he IS a person that has energy to chase after truth - even if he's not always right - and even if his personality leads him to bad choices sometimes...
Analyzing the things he says in just this one video - he's not saying anything I haven't read on these boards a million times. I would consider nearly all of his statements in this vid "Mainstream" in relation to the content we talk about here.
And I think that's what Jan encourages - because it's his attitude and energy that is useful to the "truther" movement - not his accuracy.
Does that make sense?
Now, I'm not advocating for liars - and the last time I'd watched anything from him, I slightly remember stuff about med-beds and underground (literally) societies/alien people, etc.....
If he's wrong about that stuff - but right about everything he said here in this vid - and the content in this one vid inspires people to pursue truth and feel not isolated...
Does it matter if he's wrong about med beds?
Or is the listener wrong because they're operating in a "feed me" sort of way, without any of their own discernment activity to know the difference?
I think there's more here than surface level.