I mean, we already say "the media reports this so its probably wrong" as it is.
Charlie is someone who was very wrong often, so why would I listen to someone who repeats what he says?
Q teaches us to do research on our own, not just blindly taking what people say at face value just because we're desperate to fit it into our narrative of "patriots in control" (they are). If it can't be proven, then we should absolutely be careful with the information given. Few people will wake up if we feed them bunk even only 25% of the time.
edit: and let me remind that people like Charlie pretend that they are in contact with Trump and team and working with them closely.
So, your logic is, if person A lies often, and if A makes a certain assertion, then anyone else who makes the same assertion is also a liar? I hope you see the error in this logic.
Q teaches us to do research on our own, not just blindly taking what people say at face value
No one is asking you to take anything at face value, that would be stupid. But saying "She says the same as XYZ and so he is a liar" is not critical thinking. Its at the same level as the logic used by left regarding SOF, as I already explained.
Since I know very little about Charlie Ward, I can only analyse your statements based on logic. If you want to make a comprehensive post about Charlie and all his demostrable lies, that would be worthwhile for the community.
I am saying that I dont trust her because she repeats information that only came from a known liar. I would have hoped this made logical sense to everyone. If she hasnt proven these statements to us and is just repeating them (relayed from Charlie) then what good is she? They aren't her words at that point, they are Charlie's.
Charlie is well documented on this forum so I suggest you use the search function.
Just because I agree with some things she is saying doesnt mean i should trust her. See Desantas, Ramaswampy, every other obvious deep state rino, etc.
Pointing out logical errors are not personal attacks. Kindly point out where I insulted you.
I am saying that I dont trust her because she repeats information that only came from a known liar.
Sorry fren, if you dont understand that this deduction is logically erroneous, there is nothing further I can say to you. Its nothing personal, just logic.
Trump reposted a lot of people who were obvious plants and shills. He was even on Alex Jones and we all know he is a shill as per Q. He reposted her talking about the election, specifically. That doesnt mean he supports her other claims.
Get a grip, people. We must use our own intuition and logic but not throw everyone under the bus just because of a couple of people whose shows they have been on. Every time someone comes to the forefront and we think we might be making some progress getting info, then all the nay saying starts. If your gut is not aligned with what she says, keep it to yourself UNTIL YOU HAVE SOME PROOF. You might be fighting AGAINST something 45 is doing. My guts says she is legit and aligned with the good guys for a good purpose. I don't have to swallow everything she says.......but I do think she has been brought out now to encourage the Patriots. EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS IS NOT ALWAYS NEGATIVE. DON'T LET THE NEGATIVE KEEP YOU FROM THE POSITIVE.
I think you are insinuating that ward is a liar. I’m not personally a follower of ward but I will say when Trump posted her interview that mentions those planes it was clear to me that the story is true.
I mean, we already say "the media reports this so its probably wrong" as it is.
Charlie is someone who was very wrong often, so why would I listen to someone who repeats what he says?
Q teaches us to do research on our own, not just blindly taking what people say at face value just because we're desperate to fit it into our narrative of "patriots in control" (they are). If it can't be proven, then we should absolutely be careful with the information given. Few people will wake up if we feed them bunk even only 25% of the time.
edit: and let me remind that people like Charlie pretend that they are in contact with Trump and team and working with them closely.
So, your logic is, if person A lies often, and if A makes a certain assertion, then anyone else who makes the same assertion is also a liar? I hope you see the error in this logic.
No one is asking you to take anything at face value, that would be stupid. But saying "She says the same as XYZ and so he is a liar" is not critical thinking. Its at the same level as the logic used by left regarding SOF, as I already explained.
Since I know very little about Charlie Ward, I can only analyse your statements based on logic. If you want to make a comprehensive post about Charlie and all his demostrable lies, that would be worthwhile for the community.
Thats not at all what I am saying.
I am saying that I dont trust her because she repeats information that only came from a known liar. I would have hoped this made logical sense to everyone. If she hasnt proven these statements to us and is just repeating them (relayed from Charlie) then what good is she? They aren't her words at that point, they are Charlie's.
Charlie is well documented on this forum so I suggest you use the search function.
Just because I agree with some things she is saying doesnt mean i should trust her. See Desantas, Ramaswampy, every other obvious deep state rino, etc.
The ad hominem doesnt help your case by the way.
Pointing out logical errors are not personal attacks. Kindly point out where I insulted you.
Sorry fren, if you dont understand that this deduction is logically erroneous, there is nothing further I can say to you. Its nothing personal, just logic.
Look up what ad hominem means and reread this very post...
What do you think about the fact that Trump reposted her video to millions of viewers?
Would he do that if the information was false?
Trump reposted a lot of people who were obvious plants and shills. He was even on Alex Jones and we all know he is a shill as per Q. He reposted her talking about the election, specifically. That doesnt mean he supports her other claims.
Get a grip, people. We must use our own intuition and logic but not throw everyone under the bus just because of a couple of people whose shows they have been on. Every time someone comes to the forefront and we think we might be making some progress getting info, then all the nay saying starts. If your gut is not aligned with what she says, keep it to yourself UNTIL YOU HAVE SOME PROOF. You might be fighting AGAINST something 45 is doing. My guts says she is legit and aligned with the good guys for a good purpose. I don't have to swallow everything she says.......but I do think she has been brought out now to encourage the Patriots. EVERYTHING THAT HAPPENS IS NOT ALWAYS NEGATIVE. DON'T LET THE NEGATIVE KEEP YOU FROM THE POSITIVE.
I think you are insinuating that ward is a liar. I’m not personally a follower of ward but I will say when Trump posted her interview that mentions those planes it was clear to me that the story is true.