If you are not researching at least one conspiracy then you may be a sheep. The snow globe earth psyop was genius. I still can't figure out how we spin 1000mph on our axis while spiralling around the sun which is zooming through the endless vacuum of space. Meanwhile while we are a literal carnival ride, the north star never moves at all. That light is 2.5 quadrillion miles away so why would it stalk us at an impossible speed. These hoaxers are good.
I always find it weird how we always see that one side of the moon, looks so flat! I like how all the math of the earth and speeds n all that add up to some form of 666!
We do not rotate at 1,000mph. That is a measure of tangential velocity that is only valid at the equator; that value decreases to 0 at the poles. Tangential velocity has no bearing on the acceleration generated by earth's rotation. Rotational velocity is the value for measuring spin, and earth's rotational velocity is once every 24 hours. Have someone spin you in a merry go round exactly once in a 24 hour period, and let me know how fast that feels.
The North star is actually 300-400 light years away; your figure would put the north star inside Jupiter's orbit. It does not appear to move relative to us because it is orbiting the center of the Milky Way along with our sun. It's like two racecars driving right next to each other around a racetrack; they don't appear to move very much relative to each other because both are moving in the same direction.
Sitting on a merry go round with 4' radius is no fun at 1 rpd. Now extend that radius by 3963 miles. The distance you travel on your globe sized merry go round is the perimeter of that circle or 2πR. 3963x2x3.14=24,887.64 per day ÷ 24 hours/day = 1037 miles per hour. One hell of a carnival ride.
You don't seem to grasp that the pole star doesn't move. Your straw man is that it is riding side by side with the sun but somehow the sun moves all day long and the north star sits still in the exact same location. Build that model and calculate the velocity of polaris. It must keep up with our rotation so lets use your merry go round but add some aluminum extension arms. Instead of a 4000 mile spoke length, we need 433 light years. 433ly x 6 trillion miles per LY x2xπ ÷ 24 = 6.798e14 mph. Keep in mind this is only the rotation in one plane. Don't forget to spiral around and zoom straight. Pause and digest. Why is one star so far away going to such unfathomable lengths to stalk us perfectly if we are but a speck. Could the Bible be right? Did Werner Von Braun and his band of Nazi scientists exploit the relatively new Copernicus heliocetric model to hide God?
Once again, that is tangential velocity that is only applicable at the equator. Moreover, velocity does not impart a force, only acceleration does. Force equals mass times acceleration; this is one of the most basic concepts even in Newtonian mechanics.
The acceleration due to earth's rotation at the equator (where it's effect is strongest) is given by a=omega^2*R, where omega is angular velocity (7.292E-5 rad/s), and R is the distance between you and the axis of earth's spin. At the equator, this number is the same as earth's equatorial radius, 6,378 km.
Plugging all those numbers in, you arrive at 0.0339 m/s^2. Acceleration due to earth's gravity is on average 9.81 m/s^2. And that's the maximum acceleration due to earth's rotation, the effect decreases the closer you get to the poles where R becomes 0. At maximum it is 0.34% earth's gravity; you're not going to feel that.
Applying the same equation to earth's orbit around the sun, the acceleration due to that motion is 0.005998 m/s^2, or about 0.061% acceleration due to gravity. Once again, you're never going to feel that.
You don't seem to grasp that the pole star doesn't move.
Your straw man is that it is riding side by side with the sun but somehow the sun moves all day long and the north star sits still in the exact same location.
The sun moves relative to what? The north star sits still relative to what?
Your entire objection to celestial mechanics is based around your lack of understanding of relative motion. If two cars drive around a racetrack at exactly 60 mph each, what is their motion relative to each other?
Instead of a 4000 mile spoke length, we need 433 light years. 433ly x 6 trillion miles per LY x2xπ ÷ 24 = 6.798e14 mph.
What are you getting at here? Polaris doesn't orbit around the sun like earth does.
Why is one star so far away going to such unfathomable lengths to stalk us perfectly
You are assigning agency and intelligence to an inanimate object. That's like saying the earth is greedy and selfish because it pulls objects back down to its surface.
Could the Bible be right?
The Bible is right, but it does not state in any way that the earth is flat. Every flat earth use of the Bible requires pulling a verse out of context, insisting on a literal meaning in spite of textual evidence for metaphorical meaning, and deliberately interpreting it under the assumption that the flat earth model is already viable. Even though everyone in ancient times knew the earth was round. The Greeks were the first (that we know of) to accurately measure its circumference in 300 BC, but multiple ancient cultures knew that we lived on a sphere long before that.
Literally hundreds of verses are crystal clear in context. You can simply start at the beginning in Genesis to see God placed two lights in the firmament, the Greater sun to rule the day and the lesser for night, and the stars. Exodus and Ezekiel both described the raquia ( Firmament) as hard as glass and clear pavement blue as sapphire. However, Job 38:14 is visual with the basic shape. When a king pressed his seal into clay or wax, the impression of the ring formed the clay in the middle and squeezed the excess out around the perimeter just like Antarctica. Amazing God would choose that example instead of a ball. The sun and moon run their circuit like a race track. Joshua describes the sun being halted from its circuit. The most devastating would be revelation claiming the stars will fall to earth. Holy spinning water ball, arcturas, beatlejuice, the sun, and all the countless stars that dwarf our sun will somehow find our little speck of sand. Oh my. I better open my window to cool off. Hey I'm only doing 60mph on cruise control with no acceleration and the force of this wind about blew me away. I can't imagine what 1000mph wind would do. Peace out brother. I was you two years ago. It's the most bizarre scientific hoax ever. I was outraged that professional engineers and scientists would believe such profound differences than what we learned in school. We can't find the curve (Suez canal), don't account for rotation in flights or sniper school, can't explain Polaris fixed in place, can't go to Antarctica, can't explain why southern flights refuel north of the equator, can't explain why God describes his earth as a still foot stool and we are like grasshoppers underneath his throne. The hoax was to hide God and his creation. The Fourth Commandment tells us to remember his memorial of his creation. The day is the woman in the red dress to steal your focus from the purpose of the Sabbath. Physically prove or observe any of the theories you argued above. Its hard to admit that we were tricked. The tower of Babel makes no sense unless his throne is right there on top of us as described in exodus and Ezekiel. Peace. Ill not reply again since Cat will likely slam his trap shut. Reagan nailed it when he said the globalists would need aliens to convince everyone to embrace one world government to fight the common enemy. Don't fall for the alien hoax.
If you are not researching at least one conspiracy then you may be a sheep. The snow globe earth psyop was genius. I still can't figure out how we spin 1000mph on our axis while spiralling around the sun which is zooming through the endless vacuum of space. Meanwhile while we are a literal carnival ride, the north star never moves at all. That light is 2.5 quadrillion miles away so why would it stalk us at an impossible speed. These hoaxers are good.
"something something gravity yada yada..."
I always find it weird how we always see that one side of the moon, looks so flat! I like how all the math of the earth and speeds n all that add up to some form of 666!
We do not rotate at 1,000mph. That is a measure of tangential velocity that is only valid at the equator; that value decreases to 0 at the poles. Tangential velocity has no bearing on the acceleration generated by earth's rotation. Rotational velocity is the value for measuring spin, and earth's rotational velocity is once every 24 hours. Have someone spin you in a merry go round exactly once in a 24 hour period, and let me know how fast that feels.
The North star is actually 300-400 light years away; your figure would put the north star inside Jupiter's orbit. It does not appear to move relative to us because it is orbiting the center of the Milky Way along with our sun. It's like two racecars driving right next to each other around a racetrack; they don't appear to move very much relative to each other because both are moving in the same direction.
Sitting on a merry go round with 4' radius is no fun at 1 rpd. Now extend that radius by 3963 miles. The distance you travel on your globe sized merry go round is the perimeter of that circle or 2πR. 3963x2x3.14=24,887.64 per day ÷ 24 hours/day = 1037 miles per hour. One hell of a carnival ride.
You don't seem to grasp that the pole star doesn't move. Your straw man is that it is riding side by side with the sun but somehow the sun moves all day long and the north star sits still in the exact same location. Build that model and calculate the velocity of polaris. It must keep up with our rotation so lets use your merry go round but add some aluminum extension arms. Instead of a 4000 mile spoke length, we need 433 light years. 433ly x 6 trillion miles per LY x2xπ ÷ 24 = 6.798e14 mph. Keep in mind this is only the rotation in one plane. Don't forget to spiral around and zoom straight. Pause and digest. Why is one star so far away going to such unfathomable lengths to stalk us perfectly if we are but a speck. Could the Bible be right? Did Werner Von Braun and his band of Nazi scientists exploit the relatively new Copernicus heliocetric model to hide God?
Once again, that is tangential velocity that is only applicable at the equator. Moreover, velocity does not impart a force, only acceleration does. Force equals mass times acceleration; this is one of the most basic concepts even in Newtonian mechanics.
The acceleration due to earth's rotation at the equator (where it's effect is strongest) is given by a=omega^2*R, where omega is angular velocity (7.292E-5 rad/s), and R is the distance between you and the axis of earth's spin. At the equator, this number is the same as earth's equatorial radius, 6,378 km.
Plugging all those numbers in, you arrive at 0.0339 m/s^2. Acceleration due to earth's gravity is on average 9.81 m/s^2. And that's the maximum acceleration due to earth's rotation, the effect decreases the closer you get to the poles where R becomes 0. At maximum it is 0.34% earth's gravity; you're not going to feel that.
Applying the same equation to earth's orbit around the sun, the acceleration due to that motion is 0.005998 m/s^2, or about 0.061% acceleration due to gravity. Once again, you're never going to feel that.
The sun moves relative to what? The north star sits still relative to what?
Your entire objection to celestial mechanics is based around your lack of understanding of relative motion. If two cars drive around a racetrack at exactly 60 mph each, what is their motion relative to each other?
What are you getting at here? Polaris doesn't orbit around the sun like earth does.
You are assigning agency and intelligence to an inanimate object. That's like saying the earth is greedy and selfish because it pulls objects back down to its surface.
The Bible is right, but it does not state in any way that the earth is flat. Every flat earth use of the Bible requires pulling a verse out of context, insisting on a literal meaning in spite of textual evidence for metaphorical meaning, and deliberately interpreting it under the assumption that the flat earth model is already viable. Even though everyone in ancient times knew the earth was round. The Greeks were the first (that we know of) to accurately measure its circumference in 300 BC, but multiple ancient cultures knew that we lived on a sphere long before that.
Literally hundreds of verses are crystal clear in context. You can simply start at the beginning in Genesis to see God placed two lights in the firmament, the Greater sun to rule the day and the lesser for night, and the stars. Exodus and Ezekiel both described the raquia ( Firmament) as hard as glass and clear pavement blue as sapphire. However, Job 38:14 is visual with the basic shape. When a king pressed his seal into clay or wax, the impression of the ring formed the clay in the middle and squeezed the excess out around the perimeter just like Antarctica. Amazing God would choose that example instead of a ball. The sun and moon run their circuit like a race track. Joshua describes the sun being halted from its circuit. The most devastating would be revelation claiming the stars will fall to earth. Holy spinning water ball, arcturas, beatlejuice, the sun, and all the countless stars that dwarf our sun will somehow find our little speck of sand. Oh my. I better open my window to cool off. Hey I'm only doing 60mph on cruise control with no acceleration and the force of this wind about blew me away. I can't imagine what 1000mph wind would do. Peace out brother. I was you two years ago. It's the most bizarre scientific hoax ever. I was outraged that professional engineers and scientists would believe such profound differences than what we learned in school. We can't find the curve (Suez canal), don't account for rotation in flights or sniper school, can't explain Polaris fixed in place, can't go to Antarctica, can't explain why southern flights refuel north of the equator, can't explain why God describes his earth as a still foot stool and we are like grasshoppers underneath his throne. The hoax was to hide God and his creation. The Fourth Commandment tells us to remember his memorial of his creation. The day is the woman in the red dress to steal your focus from the purpose of the Sabbath. Physically prove or observe any of the theories you argued above. Its hard to admit that we were tricked. The tower of Babel makes no sense unless his throne is right there on top of us as described in exodus and Ezekiel. Peace. Ill not reply again since Cat will likely slam his trap shut. Reagan nailed it when he said the globalists would need aliens to convince everyone to embrace one world government to fight the common enemy. Don't fall for the alien hoax.