We knew it was a set up, but this proves it. Future proves past. The narrative was carefully scripted. Calling it "insurrection" was not an accident, it was the keystone of their coup.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Nowhere in the Amendment is the Office of President mentioned. Furthermore, the President is not considered an officer of the United States.
Here is a link to New York University Journal of Law and Liberty where the authors explain why the President is not covered in Section 3 of the 14th Amendment. And, how President Trump as an individual is not subject to disqualification under the 14th Amendment because he has never taken any oath of office other than that of the President.
https://www.nyujll.com/home/blog-post-four-2kpz7-7czmg-6fbsx-l9llc-btrht-lkg3w
Thank you for this.
For the past 2 years, I have been instructing my homeschool history classes to pay attention to why "they" are so insistent to refer to J6 as an insurrection.
I have been stressing with them to consider what this language/terminology means as it relates to President Trump and our 14th amendment and the possible resulting implications.
My goal is that they begin to realize that our Constitution is not some dry, dusty, document that has no bering on today. 😊 Thanks, again!!
Very good point.
We thought they would do that early on against President Trump, but they waited too long and now it will look too obvious.
yeah it is a giant red pill
but I hate this SO MUCH!
Agreed.
Many innocents are caught up in their scheme to keep President Trump away.
Except that none of them have been charged with insurrection?
really I do not know, is that true?
Yes, sorry hard to prove a negative but the vlog lawyers have mentioned it multiple times and every article I've seen about their trials never had insurrection in the charges. None, and I read everything.
thnQ
That's a BINGO !!!
You cannot trespass in a building that you own.
Then why are they so afraid of him?