But for the airlines to claim they are simply complying as a result of a mandate is a cowards act. They have plenty of power/money and many lobyist that have used their weight for their gains in the past.
Holding private company's to account for their capitulation is, in my opinion, their cost of doing business. They should be fighting for their fundamental rights just as we are. If they should fail to do so then they should cease to exist. They have a duty to their employees and should be held to account by their customers should they simply comply.
If we have a fundamental right to exist and fight for said right then a private organization, run by private citizens, should also fight for their right to exist. Should their existence be contingent on their employees freedoms then their obligation should be to that end also. Or cease to exist.
Simply complying is, by extension, their willingness to become a participating arm of the governmental structure that is also violating The Peoples rights to be free if said freedom should also include the right to prosperity since 'prosperity' is a component of sustenance gotten at the expense of relinquishing hard work in return for a paycheck.
The People, you and I, are fully aware that ensuring said right may include a temporary suspension, at our own will and choosing, of luxuries like flying on an airline. If The People accept these terms then let the airlines or any other private organization pay the price for participating in a whole of government and private sector attempt to subvert our God given freedoms.
The airlines complied because they benefited in some way. Fascism works that way: you do want the government asks, and the government structures laws and spending to help you get what you want.
But for the airlines to claim they are simply complying as a result of a mandate is a cowards act. They have plenty of power/money and many lobyist that have used their weight for their gains in the past.
Holding private company's to account for their capitulation is, in my opinion, their cost of doing business. They should be fighting for their fundamental rights just as we are. If they should fail to do so then they should cease to exist. They have a duty to their employees and should be held to account by their customers should they simply comply.
If we have a fundamental right to exist and fight for said right then a private organization, run by private citizens, should also fight for their right to exist. Should their existence be contingent on their employees freedoms then their obligation should be to that end also. Or cease to exist.
Simply complying is, by extension, their willingness to become a participating arm of the governmental structure that is also violating The Peoples rights to be free if said freedom should also include the right to prosperity since 'prosperity' is a component of sustenance gotten at the expense of relinquishing hard work in return for a paycheck.
The People, you and I, are fully aware that ensuring said right may include a temporary suspension, at our own will and choosing, of luxuries like flying on an airline. If The People accept these terms then let the airlines or any other private organization pay the price for participating in a whole of government and private sector attempt to subvert our God given freedoms.
So be it. Let them fall.
Who owns controlling shares in these airlines? Is it Blackrock? Vanguard? If it is then there's your answer......follow the $$$!
The airlines complied because they benefited in some way. Fascism works that way: you do want the government asks, and the government structures laws and spending to help you get what you want.