an engine placed there from a different incident. look how cleanly all the ancillary tubing and such are removed from the engine. , there's no way in hell that an engine would remain that much intact after impacting 2 1/2" thick hardened steel columns. NOT possible. these were neatly placed for public viewing. just like the one composite video clip showed the nose of the plane going right through 2 external walls of hardened steel frames completely intact. ONLY a fool would believe that. look up the construction of the towers and then ask yourelf how an aluminum plane can go through 2 layers of all that concrete and steel. this engine would NOT fit through the gaps between the steel columns. NOT possible.
totally absurd and don't call me a fool to buttress your nonsense
It happened. Thousands saw it and filmed it.
an engine placed there from a different incident
It was still smoking and people saw it land there. No witnesses to the imaginary dump. By the way, why not just claim this video is CGI and the voices were added later, like CGI shills do with all the other footage that clearly shows a plane entering the tower and exploding?
Additionally, it was CIA spook Col. Fletcher Prouty that claimed that engine was dumped there and coincidentally he's also the original source of the CGI Project Blue Beam psyop. Heard of him? He's better known as Mr. X, part of the JFK Assassination. His disinformation is currently holding your brain hostage.
there's no way in hell that an engine would remain that much intact after impacting 2 1/2" thick hardened steel columns
WRONG... this engine core is nearly 100% TITANIUM and will EASILY go through steel beams, especially higher up in the structure where the beams are much lighter
wow... your reality is quite far from reality! but keep telling yourself that... eventually you'll believe it. on another note... the new clotshot is available this week.... roll up them sleeves!
I belive you are correct. Planes hit it and punch the holes that were shown. People say that the aluminum can't cut steel, but it doesn't need to, it just needs to punch it loose at the connection. The steel joint is strong in compression but not strong with a side impact....
You don't need at that. I belive a regular aircraft would do that damage. I am very familer with the structure of these planes. I replace major structural components every day at work. The wings of a large aircraft are not flimsy they have to hold the weight of all the fuel and then fly at high speed ......
granted, but a regular plane would not explode with the force demonstrated and high radiation readings at Ground Zero almost certainly were from depleted uranium.
It's very hard to add weight to an aircraft, it has to be within the center of gravity to fly. To much weight forward or aft and the flight controls can't compensate for it.
I believe we are living in a PSYOP...INSIDE of a PSYOP! Having said that - there was a Post on here yesterday that said these Planes that hit the Towers, Were put into Service only 48 hours before they went into the building?
–catsfive [S] 12 points 1 day ago +13 / -1
Yes. People saying the planes didn't exist are morons. That theory is designed to distract from something very major. Both of the planes that hit the World Trade Centers were both added to the FAA registers two days before. In other words, both those 767s were not inactive Airline use until 48 hours before the incident
hold up... I'm not saying planes did not impact the WTC. They did. What I am theorizing is flight 175 and flight 11 were fabricated scheduled flights. They never departed, and they never landed. Drones, laden with high explosives impacted the WTC and they were sold as Flight 175 and 11.
Flight 93 and Flight 77 also fall under this theory, especially given the nature of their 'wreckage'.
Not sure about NOT taking off? BUT it could be. There was virtually nothing but a hole in the field in Penn - Several VETRAN Airline Pilots tried to fly the same path that the "Supposed" jet that hit the Pentagon and crashed, they also said that some dude that took a lesson or two, is not going to be flying an airliner, at that speed at tree top level and hit anything. AND then we have the towers. Not sure WHAT went into them, BUT that alone is not what brought them down...
All flights had a small numbers of passenger. Many Raytheon employees on the manifest of Flight 77 and lots a Navy, too. Other government contractors and Hollywood types filled the passenger lists.
Seth MacFarland and Mark Wahlberg missed flight 11. I find that highly unlikely and their names were used to reinforce the existence of the flights. Many names could have been cutouts. Total fabrications or other intel fakes who assumed new identities.
I don't buy 'Let's Roll' about flight 93, and never have. Both players, Mark Bingham and Todd Beamer are frauds, both having very suspect backgrounds.
It was from Catsfive Response yesterday. Sorry obviously we had more than a few posts. It was the one where he gave details of his day on 9/11. I will look for it, but remember reading it!
The went in and went through the building and landed on the sidewalk, like the video clearly shows. It traveled through the building in less than a second.
Uncharred? You're looking at the core of the engine. The fans, housing and most of the smaller parts are gone.
I fail to see the need for rudeness and unnecessarily argumentative behavior. It does no good and will not advance your assertions and/or speculation. This sort of thing is counterproductive and is typical of those that only want to make trouble where there is none.
an engine placed there from a different incident. look how cleanly all the ancillary tubing and such are removed from the engine. , there's no way in hell that an engine would remain that much intact after impacting 2 1/2" thick hardened steel columns. NOT possible. these were neatly placed for public viewing. just like the one composite video clip showed the nose of the plane going right through 2 external walls of hardened steel frames completely intact. ONLY a fool would believe that. look up the construction of the towers and then ask yourelf how an aluminum plane can go through 2 layers of all that concrete and steel. this engine would NOT fit through the gaps between the steel columns. NOT possible.
totally absurd and don't call me a fool to buttress your nonsense
It happened. Thousands saw it and filmed it.
It was still smoking and people saw it land there. No witnesses to the imaginary dump. By the way, why not just claim this video is CGI and the voices were added later, like CGI shills do with all the other footage that clearly shows a plane entering the tower and exploding?
Additionally, it was CIA spook Col. Fletcher Prouty that claimed that engine was dumped there and coincidentally he's also the original source of the CGI Project Blue Beam psyop. Heard of him? He's better known as Mr. X, part of the JFK Assassination. His disinformation is currently holding your brain hostage.
WRONG... this engine core is nearly 100% TITANIUM and will EASILY go through steel beams, especially higher up in the structure where the beams are much lighter
It's right there in front of your eyes. You are not an authority on anything, given your denial of the reality of the video. It's real.
wow... your reality is quite far from reality! but keep telling yourself that... eventually you'll believe it. on another note... the new clotshot is available this week.... roll up them sleeves!
what a pathetic retort
I blasted your entire word salad into oblivion and you come back with that? lol
I agree with heebiejeebie. You're smarter than this. You must be tired.
nobody cares what you think, clown.
FYI, this is an engine of a Boeing 767-200.
https://tehclub.site/wp-content/uploads/Engine_B-767__Aeroflot__3101228819.jpg
I'm not sure, but are we looking at an APU?
This
Either way, that is NOT the engine of the plane associated with Flight175 (N612UA)
but it is the engine that went through the building and landed on the sidewalk.
I belive you are correct. Planes hit it and punch the holes that were shown. People say that the aluminum can't cut steel, but it doesn't need to, it just needs to punch it loose at the connection. The steel joint is strong in compression but not strong with a side impact....
I also contend that the 'planes' were not as claimed.
Full of depleted uranium and strengthened with titanium, they were reinforced and retrofitted drones, laden with high explosives.
Basically, a giant bunker buster bomb.
makes more sense than a missle disguised as a plane.
Yep... and the technology was readily available
https://youtu.be/hiAfzCV7wkU
It explains nearly every question CGI theorists have put forward as the 'it's not possible' narrative.
You don't need at that. I belive a regular aircraft would do that damage. I am very familer with the structure of these planes. I replace major structural components every day at work. The wings of a large aircraft are not flimsy they have to hold the weight of all the fuel and then fly at high speed ......
granted, but a regular plane would not explode with the force demonstrated and high radiation readings at Ground Zero almost certainly were from depleted uranium.
It's very hard to add weight to an aircraft, it has to be within the center of gravity to fly. To much weight forward or aft and the flight controls can't compensate for it.
Edit to add link
https://www.flight-study.com/2021/04/balance-stability-and-center-of-gravity.html
High explosives are not heavy and titanium is very light, lighter and stronger than alloy aluminum.
Being drones, they were passenger free and flying very light. Most likely did not have a full load of fuel, either, making them more agile and faster.
Not needed, 7075 t-6 will do the job just fine. It not quite as hard as steel but damn close to it.
This engine survived but no black box was ever found?
Actually, two fire fighters reportedly found 3 of the 4 black boxes, handed them over to FBI and never heard another word of them.
Remember, Robert Mueller was ONE WEEK on the job as FBI Director.
I believe we are living in a PSYOP...INSIDE of a PSYOP! Having said that - there was a Post on here yesterday that said these Planes that hit the Towers, Were put into Service only 48 hours before they went into the building?
I don't recall ever hearing that, if it's true.
FROM https://greatawakening.win/p/17r9N3cJbF/911-is-the-day-to-remember-two-t/c/ In TOP section
–catsfive [S] 12 points 1 day ago +13 / -1 Yes. People saying the planes didn't exist are morons. That theory is designed to distract from something very major. Both of the planes that hit the World Trade Centers were both added to the FAA registers two days before. In other words, both those 767s were not inactive Airline use until 48 hours before the incident
Interesting. I'll dig further on that.
This would also bring in the possibility flight schedules were fabricated and the planes never even took off. ( another theory of mine )
THAT OR..Something Nefarious was Added to those planes - to enhance or Enable the Damage done on that day??
hold up... I'm not saying planes did not impact the WTC. They did. What I am theorizing is flight 175 and flight 11 were fabricated scheduled flights. They never departed, and they never landed. Drones, laden with high explosives impacted the WTC and they were sold as Flight 175 and 11.
Flight 93 and Flight 77 also fall under this theory, especially given the nature of their 'wreckage'.
Not sure about NOT taking off? BUT it could be. There was virtually nothing but a hole in the field in Penn - Several VETRAN Airline Pilots tried to fly the same path that the "Supposed" jet that hit the Pentagon and crashed, they also said that some dude that took a lesson or two, is not going to be flying an airliner, at that speed at tree top level and hit anything. AND then we have the towers. Not sure WHAT went into them, BUT that alone is not what brought them down...
All flights had a small numbers of passenger. Many Raytheon employees on the manifest of Flight 77 and lots a Navy, too. Other government contractors and Hollywood types filled the passenger lists.
Seth MacFarland and Mark Wahlberg missed flight 11. I find that highly unlikely and their names were used to reinforce the existence of the flights. Many names could have been cutouts. Total fabrications or other intel fakes who assumed new identities.
I don't buy 'Let's Roll' about flight 93, and never have. Both players, Mark Bingham and Todd Beamer are frauds, both having very suspect backgrounds.
It was from Catsfive Response yesterday. Sorry obviously we had more than a few posts. It was the one where he gave details of his day on 9/11. I will look for it, but remember reading it!
thanks!
You are Welcome Good Sir!
Oh_Well_ian, why are your comments so heavily downvoted? People are either really touchy or you are right on with your theory.
you noticed that, too?? lol It's the same accounts that are brigading the CGI disinformation psyop....
Probably because my theory leads back to this guy:
Central figure in the 9/11 Plot, Dov Zakheim who was:
Signed the PNAC, which called for a 'Pearl Harbor' like event to springboard US Military intervention in the Mideast
Pentagon Comptroller that stole the $2.3 Trillion
Sat on the board at Raytheon, makers of bunker buster bombs
Was CEO of Securacom, the security company that took over the WTC right after the 1993 Bombing
Board member of Systems Planning Corporation, makers of the Flight Termination System, designed to TAKEOVER and LAND hijacked airliners ( how Ironic )
Had contract with US Air Force to retrofit 36 Boeing 767's into fueling platforms, out of Macdill AFB in Tampa
Oh.... and he's a dual-citizen to Israel and 100% MOSSAD and his parents were from UKRAINE
serialized part numbers matching the UA plane? i think not....those engines are nowhere near the size of a jet liner. what a fucking joke.
That is the core of the engine, with all the turbine blades broken off.
yes... you are a joke
that is the titanium core of the engine after the housing and the fan blades have been stripped away
Both engine hunks hit street signs, what are the odds?
More importantly, what are the odds that they were dumped there and nobody noticed?
I thought the engines went into the buildings. How would it just be laying out on the sidewalk totally uncharred?
The went in and went through the building and landed on the sidewalk, like the video clearly shows. It traveled through the building in less than a second.
Uncharred? You're looking at the core of the engine. The fans, housing and most of the smaller parts are gone.
On video the whole plane went into the building. Nothing fell off because it was bad CGI.
lol nonsense
see my other comments on this thread
The 2 Liter Pop Bottle Effect.
When it is new and unopened it is pressurized and it feels quite solid and strong.
But crack the cap just a little and that pressure is lost.
Now the bottle is no longer solid and not strong at all.
The instant that an aluminum tube loses pressure it can no longer maintain its shape.
There is no way past, "The Nose Out Shot." <[]~
nose out shot was most likely the engine you see here
Your explanation has no context and is irrelevant.
The drone was traveling at 630kts +
It did exactly what everyone saw. Don't implement denial because you can't wrap your head around it.
Shameful.
yes... your analogy was shameful and so is your lack of knowledge
embarrassing for you
Standard response. Weak indeed.
https://greatawakening.win/u/Unicornfairytale/
clown
I fail to see the need for rudeness and unnecessarily argumentative behavior. It does no good and will not advance your assertions and/or speculation. This sort of thing is counterproductive and is typical of those that only want to make trouble where there is none.
Participate or aggravate, the choice is yours.