The blue "serves and protects" the people, no? If "the blue" supports the people legitimately (without corruption), why would we not support them? If they are committing criminal acts against their oath as you suggest, they are criminals, not LEO
"The blue" does NOT support the people legitimately without corruption BY DESIGN. Even SCOTUS ruled that "the blue" has no duty to protect anyone. Yes, they are state sanctioned criminals with the LEGALLY PROTECTED ABILITY (qualified immunity) to deprive you of rights and to steal from you (civil asset forfeiture). And they're just going to keep getting worse because this is what people support.
The blue "serves and protects" the people, no? If "the blue" supports the people legitimately (without corruption), why would we not support them? If they are committing criminal acts against their oath as you suggest, they are criminals, not LEO
To protect (the elite) and enslave (the peasants).
I do not believe serve and protect is their motto anymore. It’s not their official motto anymore in any case.
"The blue" does NOT support the people legitimately without corruption BY DESIGN. Even SCOTUS ruled that "the blue" has no duty to protect anyone. Yes, they are state sanctioned criminals with the LEGALLY PROTECTED ABILITY (qualified immunity) to deprive you of rights and to steal from you (civil asset forfeiture). And they're just going to keep getting worse because this is what people support.