Watching this crap gave me eye cancer. The entire thesis hinges on the assertion that since the "documentarians" filed a DMCA complaint against the clip, it MUST be real and not altered vi AI in anyway.
There are so many problems with that assertion, but I will just address the most obvious flaw in that logic, that seems to ZOOM past Scotty whoever.
Documentarians are adversarial to Roger Stone as per this video clip. Roger Stone claims the video is not real. Documentarian claims the video is real. Assuming all other arguments about AI content is valid (its not), if Stone's adversaries wanted to push the narrative that this is a real video - then filing DMCA claim is exactly what they would do.
If, however, it was Stone claiming it was fake and then it was himself who filed DMCA (as an example) then the logic that - "aha see he filed DMCA so according to himself it must be real" - would be atleast plausible.
This is such laughable garbage, makes me think why the Cabal is suddenly target Stone.
I know Stone is a very controversial figure and no one really can tell what he is up to, but I would say this particular video makes the point for him being on the good side.
Oh, and the idea that someone would say such blatantly crazy things about Trump while being video recorded for a documentary is beyond stupid.
Oh, and the fact that such explosive stuff was being said, and Stone was not bothered by the camera, and yet the documentarian didnt bother to move the camera a tiny bit to the right to get a better recording.
Oh, and the fact that claiming anything thats shown on AJ must be Intel narrative - that logic implies the fact that he said Election was stolen, that there is a depopulation agenda, and that vaccines were bad - all that is Intel narrative.
Oh, and the fact that some obscure "documentarian" from Denmark, wants to do a documentary about Roger Stone of all people, does not throw any red flags to any of these jokers?
Stone might very well be son of the Satan himself, but this video does nothing to prove anything.
I cant see his lips enough to even make an approximation whether the audio and video match.
Roger Stone started as a BS artist. A hanger on, a big talking name dropper.
Again, I am agreeing or disagreeing with any of this stuff. Like I already mentioned, Stone is one of those people who make me vaguely disturbed when I watch them, without being able to put my finger on.
But this clip provides nothing, except the feeling that someone is doing a very bad smear job on him.
My personal theory? Stone did leak something to Smith, that he used in his indictment. They now realize that whatever he leaked is bogus and panicing. They are covering themselves by getting ready to throw Stone under the bus for this debacle. And this theory still does not rule out whether Stone is good or bad. He could be good and did this on purpose. He could be bad, and got manipulated into doing this.
I agree. I have been told a few times here that Badlands media had a podcast about how Rudy, Mueller and Stone worked together to take down the Mafia in NY. Haven't watched it, so no idea how good the theory is, but honestly, this story is filled with "Schrodinger's Characters" people who could be both good or bad, and we will only know the truth once the credit rolls.
Digital Millennium Copyright Act is a legal proceeding. Lawyers would be involved. The copy right gives the owner protection over the footage. Its not just something silly or on a whim. You cant copy right something that isnt legitimate. He couldve sent the entire raw footage as proof. Meta Data and all. I am sure there is more out there.
Why insult so much? Its 2016, pre Q. Before they knew they were fucked. Stone probably thought he was untouchable up until this point.
You say " and the fact that such explosive stuff was being said, and Stone was not bothered by the camera, and yet the documentarian didnt bother to move the camera a tiny bit to the right to get a better recording."
How much better could it be? A camera directly in his face? Stone has a potty mouth. Hes a piece of shit.
Q said AJ was a MOSSAD Asset. AJ has said in the past "Family reunion was like a CIA meeting" AJ is going to give you the bits and pieces that are probably true or are used for distractions.
You dont know anymore about the documentarian than I do. Denmark government is allegedly on record for funding the said documentary. Once again, Stone probably thought he was untouchable.
Your arguments are weirdly defensive for such a clear act of disloyalty.
The guy has a Masonic Napoleon Bonaparte Rendition of himself hanging on the wall. If you think for a second Roger Stone isnt a two faced fake Patriot youre wrong.
Once again. The Bible said youll know them by their fruit.
He has a Nixon face on his back. Nixon was a communist who was a regular attendee at Bohemian Grove.
Because the claims in this video is just so stupid.
Its 2016, pre Q.
He is calling for Trump's impeachment in 2016? Huh?
How much better could it be? A camera directly in his face? Stone has a potty mouth. Hes a piece of shit.
Better enough to see the lips move. You realise that you don't need an AI to create this clip with the way the video is done. Just someone with similar voice to record over it.
You dont know anymore about the documentarian than I do. Denmark government is allegedly on record for funding the said documentary.
Did you read my comment? I did not say I know more about the documentarian. I am saying that claiming a documentarian's DMCA takedown notice as a proof of anything is dumb, regardless of who they were, who funded it or what for. None of it is relevant for the claim in this video
AJ is going to give you the bits and pieces that are probably true or are used for distractions.
So you agree that AJ will give you mixture of truth and lies. Exactly why any claims that something must be false just because it appeared on AJ is such a silly claim.
Your arguments are weirdly defensive for such a clear act of disloyalty.
All my arguments are purely logical. If you find a mistake in my logic, please point it out. Roger stone might be the very Judas who betrayed Jesus, but in this clip there is no proof of any disloyalty.
If it was not clear from my previous comment - I am not defending Stone. I am pointing out the mistakes in the claims made in this clip.
The guy has a Masonic Napoleon Bonaparte Rendition of himself hanging on the wall. If you think for a second Roger Stone isnt a two faced fake Patriot youre wrong.
Where did I say whether he is a fake patriot or not? Why put words in my mouth? All I keep saying is This video clip does not prove what you claim it proves.
He has a Nixon face on his back. Nixon was a communist who was a regular attendee at Bohemian Grove.
Alright, this shows the level of understanding of the history of this fight. You look at world in fragments of information, thrown in your way, to confuse you. If you did a bit more digging, you will understand just how key Nixon was for this fight, why they had to "Watergate" him, and how close he was with Trump, and how he imparted his knowledge about the Cabal to Trump and prepared him for this fight.
Watching this crap gave me eye cancer. The entire thesis hinges on the assertion that since the "documentarians" filed a DMCA complaint against the clip, it MUST be real and not altered vi AI in anyway.
There are so many problems with that assertion, but I will just address the most obvious flaw in that logic, that seems to ZOOM past Scotty whoever.
Documentarians are adversarial to Roger Stone as per this video clip. Roger Stone claims the video is not real. Documentarian claims the video is real. Assuming all other arguments about AI content is valid (its not), if Stone's adversaries wanted to push the narrative that this is a real video - then filing DMCA claim is exactly what they would do.
If, however, it was Stone claiming it was fake and then it was himself who filed DMCA (as an example) then the logic that - "aha see he filed DMCA so according to himself it must be real" - would be atleast plausible.
This is such laughable garbage, makes me think why the Cabal is suddenly target Stone.
I know Stone is a very controversial figure and no one really can tell what he is up to, but I would say this particular video makes the point for him being on the good side.
Oh, and the idea that someone would say such blatantly crazy things about Trump while being video recorded for a documentary is beyond stupid.
Oh, and the fact that such explosive stuff was being said, and Stone was not bothered by the camera, and yet the documentarian didnt bother to move the camera a tiny bit to the right to get a better recording.
Oh, and the fact that claiming anything thats shown on AJ must be Intel narrative - that logic implies the fact that he said Election was stolen, that there is a depopulation agenda, and that vaccines were bad - all that is Intel narrative.
Oh, and the fact that some obscure "documentarian" from Denmark, wants to do a documentary about Roger Stone of all people, does not throw any red flags to any of these jokers?
Stone might very well be son of the Satan himself, but this video does nothing to prove anything.
Car camera and I can see his lips moving for most of video. And why? Roger Stone started as a BS artist. A hanger on, a big talking name dropper.
I cant see his lips enough to even make an approximation whether the audio and video match.
Again, I am agreeing or disagreeing with any of this stuff. Like I already mentioned, Stone is one of those people who make me vaguely disturbed when I watch them, without being able to put my finger on.
But this clip provides nothing, except the feeling that someone is doing a very bad smear job on him.
My personal theory? Stone did leak something to Smith, that he used in his indictment. They now realize that whatever he leaked is bogus and panicing. They are covering themselves by getting ready to throw Stone under the bus for this debacle. And this theory still does not rule out whether Stone is good or bad. He could be good and did this on purpose. He could be bad, and got manipulated into doing this.
I appreciate what you are saying and have great respect for your analysis. Stone goes back a long, long way.
I agree. I have been told a few times here that Badlands media had a podcast about how Rudy, Mueller and Stone worked together to take down the Mafia in NY. Haven't watched it, so no idea how good the theory is, but honestly, this story is filled with "Schrodinger's Characters" people who could be both good or bad, and we will only know the truth once the credit rolls.
Digital Millennium Copyright Act is a legal proceeding. Lawyers would be involved. The copy right gives the owner protection over the footage. Its not just something silly or on a whim. You cant copy right something that isnt legitimate. He couldve sent the entire raw footage as proof. Meta Data and all. I am sure there is more out there.
Why insult so much? Its 2016, pre Q. Before they knew they were fucked. Stone probably thought he was untouchable up until this point.
You say " and the fact that such explosive stuff was being said, and Stone was not bothered by the camera, and yet the documentarian didnt bother to move the camera a tiny bit to the right to get a better recording."
How much better could it be? A camera directly in his face? Stone has a potty mouth. Hes a piece of shit.
Q said AJ was a MOSSAD Asset. AJ has said in the past "Family reunion was like a CIA meeting" AJ is going to give you the bits and pieces that are probably true or are used for distractions.
You dont know anymore about the documentarian than I do. Denmark government is allegedly on record for funding the said documentary. Once again, Stone probably thought he was untouchable.
Your arguments are weirdly defensive for such a clear act of disloyalty.
The guy has a Masonic Napoleon Bonaparte Rendition of himself hanging on the wall. If you think for a second Roger Stone isnt a two faced fake Patriot youre wrong.
Once again. The Bible said youll know them by their fruit.
He has a Nixon face on his back. Nixon was a communist who was a regular attendee at Bohemian Grove.
Connect the dots. I know I have.
Wrong, wrong and wrong. Its literally as simple as sending a letter/email
Because the claims in this video is just so stupid.
He is calling for Trump's impeachment in 2016? Huh?
Better enough to see the lips move. You realise that you don't need an AI to create this clip with the way the video is done. Just someone with similar voice to record over it.
Did you read my comment? I did not say I know more about the documentarian. I am saying that claiming a documentarian's DMCA takedown notice as a proof of anything is dumb, regardless of who they were, who funded it or what for. None of it is relevant for the claim in this video
So you agree that AJ will give you mixture of truth and lies. Exactly why any claims that something must be false just because it appeared on AJ is such a silly claim.
All my arguments are purely logical. If you find a mistake in my logic, please point it out. Roger stone might be the very Judas who betrayed Jesus, but in this clip there is no proof of any disloyalty.
If it was not clear from my previous comment - I am not defending Stone. I am pointing out the mistakes in the claims made in this clip.
Where did I say whether he is a fake patriot or not? Why put words in my mouth? All I keep saying is This video clip does not prove what you claim it proves.
Alright, this shows the level of understanding of the history of this fight. You look at world in fragments of information, thrown in your way, to confuse you. If you did a bit more digging, you will understand just how key Nixon was for this fight, why they had to "Watergate" him, and how close he was with Trump, and how he imparted his knowledge about the Cabal to Trump and prepared him for this fight.
Nixon, ON TAPE, referred to Bohemian Grove as, and I quote, "The goddamn faggiest thing I've ever seen." Keep it straight, yo...