It Begins: Australia’s Fifth-Largest Bank Announces Digital-Only Transactions – Will Phase Out Cash, Cheque, and Phone Payments in All 80 Branches Starting Next Year
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
CURRENCY COLLAPSE! 🇦🇺
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (54)
sorted by:
There is a false logic in what you have written here.
As if 'giving up wide-ranging gun ownership rights' led directly to the current situation.
It didn't. Rather, it is a case of it being one factor in a large number of co-incidental factors.
This fact is a bit of a thorn for me whenever US pedes post statements like this, as if the 1999 collection of guns and passing of restricting gun laws is a MAIN factor in the devolvement of Australia along its current lines.
Far more damaging have been the infiltration and occupation of institutions of the globalist - Marxist dichotomy.
It's been 24 years since those laws were passed (on the foundation of a very successful false flag operation) but the groundwork for that was laid for many years (decades) before this.
The idea that "give up your gun rights" is the key factor allowing the emergence of the Cabal state here is very simplistic, and doesn't represent the reality.
It's a factor, or rather, a simple node along a course of 30+ nodes, but not the primary one at all.
I appreciate, however, the solidarity you've expressed, and the empowering "It's not over yet".
The solidarity of our worldwide pedes with Ausanons is really, really important to us (imo). But as part of that solidarity, please take some time to not reduce things too simplistically, or interpret the Australian situation completely through the United States lens. There is MUCH more to it.
wwg1wga
(ps. updooted)
nEvEr GlvE uP yOuR gUns !!!! ("They took our jobs" voice from Southpark)
"Captain obviously too late" chiming in like clockwork in a thread about Aus in one of the single biggest cliches possible on GA.
How many thousand times have I seen this?
Too many. I should never have handed that shoulder fired, Portable air defense weapon back. Woe is me.
That point was more for Americans than Aussies...They kinda already shit the bed on that one.
There comes a point when it just too late for talk.
Its too late for protests, strong worded letters and diplomatic solutions.
Case in point - a parking ticket. If you don't pay, they'll do everything civil before showing up at your house and under the threat of violence, kidnap you and then make you pay.
It is ONLY the threat of violence that compels you into compliance
There's nothing else like it... it's simply uncanny - incidentally, it just as effective on those who would use violence against you.
So yeah... it's all cliche I guess...but there comes a time when people just need to be punched in the mouth and thrown a beatin' for doing what they did so order can be rightfully restored.
Can't say I agree with all of your views expressed here.
Curiously, regarding parking tickets, I have 'defeated' two parking tickets in the last 12 months, without resorting to violence or even to a judicial hearing, but by actually not complying with their system.
I guess some folks like to think that 'threat of violence' is the only thing that compels THEM into compliance. But they aren't everybody. Many comply because they actually think its the right thing to do. Violence doesn't come into the question.
The other day, I was in an incident where I damaged a person's car late at night, when no one was around. I could have left the scene and no person other than myself would be the wiser. I chose not to.
Likewise, many comply with [x] because they actually think it is the right thing to do. Others, yes, one can assume, only do so because they will be threatened with violence otherwise.
Human beings are complex. In any case, your analogy (I'm hoping) about punching people in the mouth and throwing them for a beating, well, not really my cup of tea.
Cheers.
Yep... I get what you're saying.
My point was, without the threat of violence - nobody would comply with anything. It's their threat of violence (stick) that compels obedience. That's the bottom line.
Strongly worded letters or words don't repel physical force. Unfortunately, that's reality across all species on this planet.
I think I'd modify that to "without threat of violence, nobody would comply with obvious evil".
I think we're roughly on the same page. You sound kinda Bastiat-ish to me. :D