It's good information, but it is also important to understand that you will be challenged by the very correct argument that diagnoses will also have increased due to technology that wasn't even a wish in the minds of humanity in 1936.
It's very possible that vaccines have increased the rate of disease and this will definitely be a pocket bit of information to have, and we need to find good information (like this) to help support our arguments.
Everyone should be seeking more accounts like this through the years, and we need to figure out a (sane and reasonable) argument to discount to some degree the technological leaps that have occurred over the years that made diagnosis more common.
I find his best book was ""The World Order"", which he said he mis-titled only because he did not know they woud be called the ""NEW"" World Order, and believed it was only the uprising of the Old World Order, in their attempt to re-enslave all of humanity as they once had before America was allowed to exist in Their ""Experiment"" of ""Humans need Harsh Rulers""....
Can someone help me reconcile the polio vaccine?
I know that a lot of vaccines are bad but surely there exists at minimum one white hat cure which I presume jumpstarted the “cured patients are no longer customers” philosophy of the current pharma model.
Maybe I’m wrong. Open to reading articles. Thanks friends.
Yeah, like the monkey gene I got when I was in the tests for the polio vaccine when I was six. Time bomb. Some minor skin cancer, but not the BIG ONE yet.
Cancer is uncontrolled growth specifically when the autophagy and apoptosis cellular programs are broken. Understanding the rooots of cancer metabolism requires investigations into the causes of programmatic changes from differentiantions to proliferations. The energetics of the cell is key, which means the redox potential of the mitochondria is key, which means the energetics of the environment is key.
There are a number of ways modern, post industrial society has radically altered the inputs of our environments compared to what our ancestors exprienced. That's a biophysics rabbit hole one can investigate for themselves. Nevertheless, to point the finger at vaccines as the sole or primary culprit is a shoddy attempt at correlation = causation, and clearly misinforms the public on getting root cause answers to the cancer epidemic. This proposal skimps a bit on the mechanisms involved, but also ignores of all the other environmental conditions that have radically changed over the course of the 20th century into the 21st. Yes I am aware of the SV40 cancer causing monkey kidney virus in the polio batches and Nixon's subsequent "war on cancer" which was clearly a gov't cleanup operation for the pandora's box they unleashed, but that doesn't extrapolate to all vaccines going back to the early 20th century. The environmental inputs contributing to a new era of biologic chaos goes back to least the invention and propagation of the light bulb and the AC power grid.
tl; dr: a vaccine in itself would never be enough. You need both a match and a fuse to sow the kind of cellular chaos that underlies a cancerous state.
It's good information, but it is also important to understand that you will be challenged by the very correct argument that diagnoses will also have increased due to technology that wasn't even a wish in the minds of humanity in 1936.
It's very possible that vaccines have increased the rate of disease and this will definitely be a pocket bit of information to have, and we need to find good information (like this) to help support our arguments.
Everyone should be seeking more accounts like this through the years, and we need to figure out a (sane and reasonable) argument to discount to some degree the technological leaps that have occurred over the years that made diagnosis more common.
When I was a child, getting cancer was a shock. Today it seems getting cancer, at some point, is to be expected. It's not if, it's when.
Eustace Mullins. Patriot and hero. Wrote several great books including: The Secrets of the Federal Reserve.
I find his best book was ""The World Order"", which he said he mis-titled only because he did not know they woud be called the ""NEW"" World Order, and believed it was only the uprising of the Old World Order, in their attempt to re-enslave all of humanity as they once had before America was allowed to exist in Their ""Experiment"" of ""Humans need Harsh Rulers""....
It is a very interesting read.....
I recommend this for viewing. He has a lot of great information.
https://archive.org/details/youtube-u9BdfQSO_js
https://archive.org/details/rape-of-justice-lecture
Edit for correct video link.
Hey thanks. I have been suspecting that but now know for sure.
Absolutely!
Video part 1 of 2
https://files.catbox.moe/bo2qz6.mp4
https://web.archive.org/web/20230925013825/https://files.catbox.moe/bo2qz6.mp4
Video part 2 of 2
https://files.catbox.moe/i66i2r.mp4
https://web.archive.org/web/20230925013900/https://files.catbox.moe/i66i2r.mp4
Attribution
Thanks to Benjamin for publishing this video
Can someone help me reconcile the polio vaccine? I know that a lot of vaccines are bad but surely there exists at minimum one white hat cure which I presume jumpstarted the “cured patients are no longer customers” philosophy of the current pharma model. Maybe I’m wrong. Open to reading articles. Thanks friends.
Research polio and DDT, if they haven't wiped the internet.
VACCINES_ Dissolving Illusions book
https://files.catbox.moe/ipod5r.epub
Yeah, like the monkey gene I got when I was in the tests for the polio vaccine when I was six. Time bomb. Some minor skin cancer, but not the BIG ONE yet.
Cancer is uncontrolled growth specifically when the autophagy and apoptosis cellular programs are broken. Understanding the rooots of cancer metabolism requires investigations into the causes of programmatic changes from differentiantions to proliferations. The energetics of the cell is key, which means the redox potential of the mitochondria is key, which means the energetics of the environment is key.
There are a number of ways modern, post industrial society has radically altered the inputs of our environments compared to what our ancestors exprienced. That's a biophysics rabbit hole one can investigate for themselves. Nevertheless, to point the finger at vaccines as the sole or primary culprit is a shoddy attempt at correlation = causation, and clearly misinforms the public on getting root cause answers to the cancer epidemic. This proposal skimps a bit on the mechanisms involved, but also ignores of all the other environmental conditions that have radically changed over the course of the 20th century into the 21st. Yes I am aware of the SV40 cancer causing monkey kidney virus in the polio batches and Nixon's subsequent "war on cancer" which was clearly a gov't cleanup operation for the pandora's box they unleashed, but that doesn't extrapolate to all vaccines going back to the early 20th century. The environmental inputs contributing to a new era of biologic chaos goes back to least the invention and propagation of the light bulb and the AC power grid.
tl; dr: a vaccine in itself would never be enough. You need both a match and a fuse to sow the kind of cellular chaos that underlies a cancerous state.