Lin Wood EPIC video - TAKE THEM OUT
(twitter.com)
Comments (23)
sorted by:
Use caution & the discernment you've been praying for, ... as usual Listen but don't be manipulated.
well said.
ON Lin Wood
This is a problem. The evidence is in, including from direct testimony and confession, that the Proud Boys and Oathkeepers at j6 were there (by their own confession, and communications) to incite a trigger of a kinetic Civil War.
That is exactly what the deep state wants. They want a civil war, to trigger maga into things that would then allow them - to justify - to institute the draconian authoritarian control they want. Oldest play in the book. Strike One.
As the evidence shows, Jacob Chansley did NOT do anything at all to incite an insurrection or a civil war, which is what the DS agenda was on that day. Nor was he part of the crew that actively pursued that agenda, including proud boys, oath keepers, Azov ukrainians and others.
I saw those posts about him being "a supporter" at BLM rallies, but they were completely inconclusive . Just putting him there doesn't mean he is a supporter at all. Simply, in fact, that he was more than likely there to oppose and expose those antifa, blm operations. It makes ZERO sense that he would go there clearly identifiable as the "Qanon Shamon supporting Antifa/BLM", and THEN attempt to go in to capital on J6 as "Maga". You cannot be both. You've got to be disguised as one or the other.
So why was Wood attempting to paint Chansley as a plant? The extremely weak but emotionally triggering accusations and the 'evidence' they referred to are characteristic of such agitation campaigns, to trigger and agitate people against someone or something. Why did Wood say nothing about the Proud Boys or Oathkeepers who were actually doing the DS work at the time? Strike Two.
Wood proclaims the fact that he has NOT been sued by them as proof that his claims are legitimate. What a weak, weak argument. One, why on earth should they bother with such claims (many, many people have made such claims, all across the net) from an inconsequential person, a defamation lawyer from Georgia (who really only came to prominence in the MAGA movement and truth sphere by defending the kid from the Capital)? Wood isn't a publisher, a newspaper. Two, where is the evidence he promised to spill? Where is it all? Surely the wider community should see it? I've not seen it. So where is it? Three, accusations like this are an EASY in with people in the movement who gravitate to salacious accusations about people who trigger their emotions. Strike Three.
I'm glad I revisited this thread and comment of yours. Because I'd forgotten some of the original reasons why I decided long ago who Wood actually is.
So which is it? Either he is a sincere patriot, willing to fight and sacrifice for truth and his country, and put OUT the evidence and stand up for the truth, or he's not, and he just shuts his mouth and stays quiet, making ALL the accusations, but providing NONE of the actual evidence he SAYS he has.
He's retired now. Is disbarment an issue? Or is he keeping the evidence secret because it's too much trouble, and he fears hurt or death, unlike Christian martyrs throughout history?
There are MILLIONS of ways to get the information out, and its does NOT require a twitter account.
I'll suggest another explanation. Wood has been a DS asset for many years (an interesting quirk being the Jon Benet connection, which in fact may have all been a psyop, but that's another story). He and his handlers saw a chance for him with the Convington case, and he rose to reputation and some level of prominence in the MAGA movement on the basis of taking and winning that case.
But as a DS asset, his mission is to agitate, promulgate confusion and accusation against actual threats (persons, situations who are threats) to the DS.
He constantly appeals to certain sectors of the Truth community and the MAGA community primarily via the mechanism of preaching his own sanctimonious 'beliefs' while accusing, attacking others, lifting up ONLY those who praise him. Making accusations and saying I have all the evidence BUT never providing it, well, who does that sound like? Adam Schiff anyone?
After Nov 3, 2020, his mission was to foment as much discord as possible and assist in the objective of triggering open, civil conflict. Exactly what the DS wanted.
Making accusations, and getting banned from Twitter, etc, are also easy ways to ingratiate himself to his target audience. But a secretive DS asset can just as easily get himself banned as a legitimate anon or patriot. It proves nothing, but is a great 'image'.
According to wiki, Wood "surrendered his law license and asked to retire rather than face disbarment." Who knows if wiki is accurate here or not, but if true, then why? Why would he not willingly allow himself to be disbarred IF he was right, and telling the truth? Backing down, and asking for the easy way out, seems pretty much at contrast with a LOT of wood's rhetorical behavior.
His record with Rittenhouse isn't exactly inspiring, either.
Whichever way one looks at it, How Wood behaves and acts, and works, maps very well on to how an intelligence asset would work to position himself in to places of influence under cover. Pretending to be one thing, and doing it well, to gather support and followers, by saying the right things at the right time. But, as scripture tells us, you shall know them by their fruits.
What has Wood accomplished for MAGA or Truth other than cause dissension, sow distrust, throw out accusations, often at obvious targets, and make himself into the center of an almost "personality cult"-like fixation from a group of fans?
Honest question.
wwg1wga
thank you for the information. I have decided that I am not going to judge wood, flynn, powell, etc. Not saying you are wrong, but we are in an information war and I don't have all of the information. I don't trust anyone. I also don't think it is of much importance if I know who is a wh and who is a bh.
That being said I appreciate you laying this information out, b/c nobody should "trust" lin wood or any of these players.
Thanks for the input. I guess I am constantly puzzled by the statements that some pedes make, like "I trust Flynn" or "I don't trust Powell" etc.
This would make sense to me if the person was having some dealing or interaction with that person in a way that has tangible outcomes. Like doing a business deal, or asking them to pick up your kids, or accepting what they say and then taking specific actions based on that.
But none of the pedes who express the idea of "trusting" are in that situation, as far as I can see. So it makes no sense to me to "trust" or "not trust".
In a sense, I trust Donald Trump, because I will give my 100% support to him (specific action), pray for him, etc. (I cannot vote for him, but would if I could). But what I "trust" him for is that he will do his best for America.
In a sense, I trust Lin Wood, that he will act as he does, in order to undermine MAGA and the Q movement. But there are no specific actions I will take based on that. So it's not exactly consequential whether I 'trust' him to be him, or not.
I think the stance you are taking is a good one, because you are quite right - we do not have all the information. But I rely on my discernment a lot, in order to navigate the times we are in. Certain players I will generally ignore, having concluded that their objectives and purposes are not the same as mine (i.e. shills, disinfo agents, etc).
However, BECAUSE we are in an information war, I also think its important that we build discernment, view and process the information we have, to understand what is going on. Because we are always under attack from or influence from both sides. There ARE disinformation agents whose purpose is to undermine our work, our efforts, and our community. I think it would be very naive indeed to imagine that this is NOT the case.
Identifying what actions harm us, and what actions benefit us, is the key. Whether a person is a WH or BH, is sort of besides the point (as you say, we don;t have all the information). But because we are 'soldiers' (every patriot is a soldier today!) we must make some effort to evaluate what benefits us, what hurts or hinders our cause. On that basis, we can make informed or at least reasonable decisions on whose efforts or actions we should support or aid.
Above all, sharing information, making reasoned arguments and sharing opinions is part of that process of building discernment and figuring out what actions help us and what hinder us. In the absence of information, or incoming new information, it's wise to apply the OODA loop.
Observe, Orient, Decide, Act. So we need to observe above all.
If pedes on this board, and we are all essentially on the same side with the same overarching purpose, could present serious and reasoned arguments why Lin Wood, for example, why and how his actions benefit our cause, etc., then that would be good to add to the discussion. Then we could talk about it.
Which is why i put the question I did at the end of my comment.
For me, however, I'm not convinced by his mere rhetoric. In fact, his rhetoric raises many red flags for me, rather than inspiring or convincing me. Talk is easy. What about his impact? What effects does his actions have? I mean, beneficial ones?
He is a fighter and a divider- I think he's a Judas Sheep or Goat(?) whatever that term is.
He whips up people with big emotional pleadings.... tossed in with some scripture...
I choose to not to listen to him, but it's interesting to hear his manipulative techniques.
What worship group
The Lin Wood fans. On his telegram, for example. But poorly worded, so:
Edit: an almost "personality cult"-like fixation from a group of fans.
I listened to Lin Wood in the beginning. I thought he was honest. Over time, after he turned on literally everyone that he had called his "friend" - it became clear through his actions that he was dishonest and frankly a liar. Or perhaps mentally unstable. I do not consider him a legitimate source of any info, and the divisiveness that he sowed was incredibly destructive to so many people. He has a lot to repent for.
Beware of False Prophets.
Discernment is a critical tool.
Love it.
Lin wood is a great American.
Couldn’t agree more !
I agree.
Im a big fan! :-)
He does amazing work
Lin wood is an odd bird who I have a feeling may be doing a lot behind the scenes like Powell. Both were really weird and seemed like they were important and then distanced themselves intentionally.
Lin Wood is completely off my radar. Hes done enough to endure my skepticism. Im not throwing the baby out with the bath water but to me he is inconsequential.
Not a bad stance. Balance is required. However, perhaps I'm uninformed, but all I've really seen from him is rhetoric and talk. And the impact of that rhetoric seems pretty destructive to me.
If you are uninformed then so am I. Hes done nothing to move the Awakening forward unless its way under the radar stuff, out of the publics eye. Everything hes done seems to be destructive to our goals.
That song seems to have some meaning. I think it’s called Cool Runnings
Silent running.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i17mgRK3GX8