You are not going to find anyone more Pro Trump then me.
I just wanted to get that out of the way before this next statement.
President Trump is also playing a role. I do not believe that He is the one making all the decisions.
Of course he is WAY UP the chain. There is no question about that.
I think the White Hats are doing this by the Book (Law of War manual).
President Trump may have the final call on some decisions because he is (was) President and this is all by the book.
I have read through some of that Manual and I get completely lost.. That says a lot about public education of which I am a product.
President Trump is obviously the face of the White Hat operation. While only a few of the White Hats know the entire plan there may well be hundreds / thousands more that are like minded White Hats from around the world that know a good percentage of what is going on.
The people in the public view are playing their roles. Some of those people have put their lives and the lives of their families on the line for a cause they believe is greater than themselves. Some have also sacrificed their reputations for the plan.
Of course President Trump is in that list.
They are all heroes and deserve our highest respect.
I agree with almost all of the sentiments you've expressed here, except perhaps the idea that this is all about the Law of War manual. I think that it's likely a component, but I don't pin everything on it like some do.
To me, it's unclear how exactly all that is connected, if at all, (even though I've reviewed some of it and exposed myself to Majic Eyes only, interpretations, etc.)
Also, LoW manual was NOT written for lay persons. It's designed and written specifically for Department of Defense personnel.
This manual is a Department of Defense (DoD)-wide resource for DoD personnel – including commanders, legal practitioners, and other military and civilian personnel – on the law of war.
It's a highly technical document, and I think it would be a big ask to have anyone with just a routine public education or even a specialist education in other fields, to grasp it. So perhaps don't be so harsh on yourself.
Moreover, its about WAR and the legal or lawful aspects of conducting war between two or more belligerent powers. If you are reading it as it its going to explain everything about the PLAN or what the white hats are doing, I don't think you are going to find those answers.
There will be aspects of the current operations (plan) to which the LoW will be relevant, but a lot of other aspects that are not, as well.
Anyway, besides this, I think all your other points are spot on and well said. God bless you for your patriotic heart, fren.
Thanks, I agree with you about the Law of War Manual.
I should have just said that the White Hats of following a legal plan that will hold up in a court of law. A REAL court of law of course.
If that legal plan is the Law of War manual than that is what it is. If the Law of War manual is just a component than like you said they have another legal avenue that they are following.
Thanks for the reply and also for reminding me that the Law of War manual is not something you can just pick up and understand without a solid understanding the technical underpinnings.
I think that manual is harder to decipher than the mumble jumble we are required to sign off on every time we load new software on our computers.
You are not going to find anyone more Pro Trump then me.
I just wanted to get that out of the way before this next statement.
President Trump is also playing a role. I do not believe that He is the one making all the decisions.
Of course he is WAY UP the chain. There is no question about that. I think the White Hats are doing this by the Book (Law of War manual). President Trump may have the final call on some decisions because he is (was) President and this is all by the book.
I have read through some of that Manual and I get completely lost.. That says a lot about public education of which I am a product.
President Trump is obviously the face of the White Hat operation. While only a few of the White Hats know the entire plan there may well be hundreds / thousands more that are like minded White Hats from around the world that know a good percentage of what is going on.
The people in the public view are playing their roles. Some of those people have put their lives and the lives of their families on the line for a cause they believe is greater than themselves. Some have also sacrificed their reputations for the plan. Of course President Trump is in that list.
They are all heroes and deserve our highest respect.
I agree with almost all of the sentiments you've expressed here, except perhaps the idea that this is all about the Law of War manual. I think that it's likely a component, but I don't pin everything on it like some do.
To me, it's unclear how exactly all that is connected, if at all, (even though I've reviewed some of it and exposed myself to Majic Eyes only, interpretations, etc.)
Also, LoW manual was NOT written for lay persons. It's designed and written specifically for Department of Defense personnel.
It's a highly technical document, and I think it would be a big ask to have anyone with just a routine public education or even a specialist education in other fields, to grasp it. So perhaps don't be so harsh on yourself.
Moreover, its about WAR and the legal or lawful aspects of conducting war between two or more belligerent powers. If you are reading it as it its going to explain everything about the PLAN or what the white hats are doing, I don't think you are going to find those answers.
There will be aspects of the current operations (plan) to which the LoW will be relevant, but a lot of other aspects that are not, as well.
Anyway, besides this, I think all your other points are spot on and well said. God bless you for your patriotic heart, fren.
Thanks, I agree with you about the Law of War Manual.
I should have just said that the White Hats of following a legal plan that will hold up in a court of law. A REAL court of law of course.
If that legal plan is the Law of War manual than that is what it is. If the Law of War manual is just a component than like you said they have another legal avenue that they are following.
Thanks for the reply and also for reminding me that the Law of War manual is not something you can just pick up and understand without a solid understanding the technical underpinnings.
I think that manual is harder to decipher than the mumble jumble we are required to sign off on every time we load new software on our computers.