Probably for this reason.
- In February 1917 the Soviets took control of Russia.
- Ukraine, which was part of the Russian empire, immediately claimed autonomy from the Soviet take over.
- in October 1917 the Bolsheviks took over Russia and invaded Ukraine.
- November 1917 the Balfour Declaration was created, establishing the nation of Israel.
When the Kazarians (the Rothschilds, etc) saw they would lose their center of operation, they decided to create their own sovereign country.
You can argue that the Balfour Declaration was not the origins of Israel but it was the final clincher. Halfway through WW1, tha Allies were struggling. Some wanted out and the UK was running short of everything. Being an island has advantages and disadvantages!
The UK government hoped that they could prevail upon "the Jews" for finance and for their influence in the USA. They wanted the USA to join in with WW1 and it was thought that Jewish influence could make that happen. (I find that remarkable!)
The UK government sent a nice letter to the second Lord Rothschild saying: "His Majesty's Government view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people, and will use their best endeavours to facilitate the achievement of this object ..." Sadly, the next part of that sentence seems to have been forgotten.
The UK was governing Palestine at the time. If you remember your Lawrence of Arabia, he did a great job out there. Peter O'Toole wanted to give Arabia back to Omar Sharif but he was thwarted by the British government - because they wanted to give it to the Jews, instead.
I appreciate what you're saying, but the "final clincher" was really the creation of the State of Israel by the United Nations. That couldn't have happened without the forced emigration into Israel from Europe by the "Nazis" (which was aided by the closed borders of all other nations to the Jews, and economic incentives to promote moving to Palestine), and of course the creation of the United Nations itself, both of which were primary functions of both WWI and WWII.
The Balfour Declaration certainly has it's place of note, but it was just one step in the chain. I agree it was an important event, I suggest it was not the most important event in the creation of the State of Israel. It's importance is really in it's brevity and content, i.e. it is something that is easy to show to the public that suggests a broader fuckery.
T.E. Lawrence was a controlled opposition agent, a spy. Believing the propaganda about him from the movie is exactly what you are supposed to believe. The evidence suggests the entire event was orchestrated, controlled on all sides. Nothing was left to chance. No one was acting towards the agenda that history, or their "biography" portrays.
I suggest the best lens to look through history is to take what actually happened as an outcome, then work backwards to see who created that outcome, and see who funded them. For example, what actually happened after WWII was the United Nations was created, Israel was created, and the Cold War was created. You need to dig deep into who was responsible for the creation of these things. Look at their family connections, their job connections, their other work for The Trust (the word I use in my report about Rockefeller et al). Recognize that everyone was an aristocrat, all related to each other, both by family and by monetary obligation. This is the case even for those who "history" reports as "coming from humble beginnings".
A deeper investigation into everyone involved in any event of note for the past few centuries returns a result that suggests an orchestration so detailed it boggles imagination. It is the level of control of all sides, and the rejection the mind demands to cope with the possibility of everything being controlled opposition, which is exactly how it has remained hidden for so long. That and of course us being strongly encouraged to not look at anything that suggests "a conspiracy."
I did wonder how he was allowed to do what he did.