-
Israel chose to ignore intelligence from Egyptian officials about a major attack coming from Hamas.
-
Multiple former IDF soldiers & Israeli intelligence personnel have come forward online and said there’s a zero percent chance Israel was unaware of this attack beforehand or couldn’t have prevented it.
-
We just watched unsophisticated terrorists on hang gliders soar into one of the most heavily-defended & surveilled countries on the planet.
-
Within 48 hours of the attack, we’re now suddenly seeing enormous support for an American war with Iran and the genocide of the Palestinian people.
I’m witnessing American pastors and formerly level-headed influencers in our world completely lose their minds and call for genocide. It’s unsurprising, but insane to watch.
If the events of the past three years have taught me anything, it’s that when people get whipped into an emotional frenzy, critical thinking completely goes out the window.
People become highly suggestible and will rush to extremely dangerous conclusions without thinking about the consequences. I think this is what we’re all witnessing with this situation in Israel.
I’m reminded of Pearl Harbor and 9/11. In both scenarios, the American government received intelligence in advance of the attacks, but chose not to prevent the attacks. Why?
The American government was willing to sacrifice the lives of American citizens in order to advance its geopolitical goals.
Pearl Harbor gave the justification to enter WWII.
9/11 gave justification to invade the Middle East & drastically expand the American military industrial complex & our surveillance apparatus.
They were brutal & extremely traumatic events for the American public to witness. The emotional trauma caused people to get whipped into an emotional frenzy.
America wanted ONE THING in response to these attacks: The blood of our enemies. I see the same psyop playing out now. People are whipped into a frenzied bloodlust.
In their frenzied bloodlust, people are overlooking some SERIOUSLY important facts here, notably:
-
The fact that none of this adds up,
-
Innocent civilians are being threatened with genocide, and
-
Escalated violence in the Middle East and a war with Iran both risk the rest of the planet getting dragged into WWIII.
What happened in Israel this weekend was obviously gut-wrenching and awful to witness, but I do not trust Israel’s so-called “intelligence failure”, nor do I trust the snakes in Washington calling for war with Iran, & I sure as hell no longer trust any of the emotionally-frenzied influencers calling for explicit genocide of innocent civilians.
This was a defining moment in history, similar to Pearl Harbor, 9/11, COVID, the beginning of the Ukraine war, etc, and a lot of people just got played. Hard.
People responded by going full mask-off, exposing themselves as reckless & incapable of exercising sound judgment in moments of chaos and heightened emotion.
And we’re now at the brink of WWIII because of it. This is all worth noting.
There’s a high likelihood there will be more chaos throughout the rest of this decade. There will be more psychological operations.
There will be more moments in time in which cooler heads ought to prevail, but people will get whipped into an emotional frenzy instead.
Keep your wits about you, & be cautious in whom you allow yourself to be influenced by.
Recognize that governments & intelligence agencies spend enormous resources waging psychological operations on social media nonstop when stuff like this goes down.
Remember that when chaos is at its peak, history shows there is ALMOST ALWAYS a hidden agenda being played out, & that hidden agenda is ALWAYS designed to prey on our base emotions to facilitate a desired end-result.
Pray for world peace tonight.
Thanks. 🤙
Imported from: https://twitter.com/sovereignbrah/status/1711578357253456181
1 John 2:22 “Who is the liar? It is whoever denies that Jesus is the Christ. Such a person is the antichrist—denying the Father and the Son.”
So, many individuals can be an “antichrist”. But THE Antichrist will have to openly deny Jesus Christ in order to officially be the “Antichrist”. My assumption is they’ll come in the name of One World Religion, professing we should all love one another and drop our religious labels, including Christians.
Head on a swivel.
You know who has said a similar thing, on many occasions? Prince Charles, now King Charles of the UK.
He said that he wants to be "defender of faith," not "defender of the faith," as the monarch has always been known before.
Now, that sounds good at first glance. It sounds like the freedom of religion that we are supposed to have here in the U.S. But I'm just not sure that's how he meant it.
Given the state of the UK right now - where the mayor of London is an English-Pakistani muslim and the First Minister of Scotland is a Scottish-Pakistani muslim - it starts to sound more and more like freedom from Christianity.
Charles, his brother Prince Andrew, and their late father Prince Philip have long been thought to be involved with pedophilia and other underground perversion.
Watch King Charles.
https://www.ucl.ac.uk/news/2022/sep/opinion-king-charles-defender-faith
I saw a writeup once suggesting Charles may be the Antichrist. I think it was using gematria as the basis. The only problem I have with that is that the Antichrist is supposed to be extremely charismatic and Charles is anything but, in my opinion.
lol I don't find him charismatic myself, for sure - but watch him working a crowd. Many worldwide adore him and, as I said, a lot of that is because of his mother - but they still love him and think he's a wonderful king and a wonderful man.
I sometimes wonder if Harry isn't freaking out because he knows the truth and had to get out. Hard to say.
The AC will be MUCH more charming than King Charles.
"All that dwell upon the earth shall worship him whose names are not written in the Lamb's book of life." Rev 13:8
Charles actually has had quite a following worldwide all his life. A lot of that is because his mother was much loved and highly respected (rightly or wrongly, she was.) That carries over to him and he could well use it.
Reading over John 2:22 I got this.
Maybe I am looking at the wrong book/teaching...
I had to look it up. That is the book of John. He is referencing the book of 1 John (near the back of the New Testament).
Thank you. I need to double down on this stuff. I had forgotten there was John, 1 John, & 2 John
Putting the antichrist quote into some more context I found these verses before & after to be helpful to me.