Why is Israel bombing civvies and not military installations? Sounds like a war crime to me!
(media.greatawakening.win)
🤢 These people are sick! 🤮
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (50)
sorted by:
your link literally says it's a chemical weapon
plenty of videos on telegram, the MSM may or may not show them in the future due to absurd bias towards pro Israel.
you keep dodging questions and throwing wild accusations.
Let me ask you a question, is there a war crime that would make you say "maybe Israel is the bad guy?" Or nah?
Only Israel can kill civilians!!
Not a "chemical weapon" in regard to any prohibited aspect. That category only applies if it is used specifically as an agent to produce toxicity. Smoke-production is okay...as you would know if you actually READ the article.
There are always plenty of videos on telegram. But what do they mean? Even incendiary use is permitted under the right circumstances. (As you would know, etc.)
I haven't "dodged" any question, and the wild accusations fall on your side.
So long as Israel targets opposing forces and does not violate any treaty to which it is a signatory, I have no problem. Why should I?
It is plain as day that you just want an excuse to bash Israel. I would not be surprised if you have heartburn over the U.S. bombardment of Japanese cities in World War II.
there are clear videos of white phosphorous being used in incendiary ways in the current conflict.
I do take issue with bombing cities and civilians with nuclear weapons. there were plenty of other valid military targets
Seems killing civilians doesn't bother you, unless it's Jews??
And there is no problem with using it against military forces, fren. (read the whole article)
You don't mention the fire bombing of Tokyo, which hardly ever gets mention. The reason for the use was primarily that only area effect weapons would be effective, since the intervening crosswinds prevented any accuracy of bombing. Tokyo, as the center of government, was an indisputable military target, a key one.
And so were Hiroshima and Nagasaki, if you bother to read the history of the target selection Nagasaki was the reserve target, as their original target was under adverse weather conditions.
I'm a quarter German and plenty of German civilians were killed collaterally with the European bombing campaign. That's what happens when the aggressor begins with bombing civilians. You seem to believe in this fiction of "innocent civilians" inhabiting the aggressor's country. They countenanced the war and all that came from it. They could have kept the peace---but they decided to subscribe to be led and governed by a suicidal terrorist movement, so this is what comes down on their heads. As with the Germans. As with the Japanese.
I'll turn it around. Seems killing peaceful Israelis doesn't bother you. I wonder why.