Careful with this dude or whatever he is imo. He puts out lots of good content for the most part, but has some shady shit and blocks when confronted about it. I prefer Dom Lucre personally
If anything, that picture is mocking Mossad. Like if someone wears a t-shirt making fun of Hillary's body count and is accused of being Hillary sympathizer.
Even her 2019 tweet is a very clever way of bringing "Mossad" into the conversation about Israel.
Oh, and the best way to know who the controlled opposition are - casually smearing SoF.
as you can't really not question it....
Haha, this phrase reminds me of the time a few years ago when my friends living in California started claiming "They cant afford not to buy a hybrid car"
The 'but the cross' reaction may be the very reason for it's presence, awareness of the other sides symbols makes them easy to use against them so I tend to be skeptical of anything done demonstratively, especially if it contradicts something worse being implied....
Exactly, I always read the room, In sales for 30 years, Zoom took it to a new level .., they set the stage. Everyone does it consciously or unconsciously.
I suggest you dig into all the smears he states matter-of-factly and you will understand the true purpose of people like this.
This tactic is called FUD - fear, uncertainty and doubt. Lot of accusations based on half truths, omissions and out of context information to drive a narrative.
Careful with this dude or whatever he is imo. He puts out lots of good content for the most part, but has some shady shit and blocks when confronted about it. I prefer Dom Lucre personally
The self avowed Mason?
I'd stay away from both
Fair, but FYI not all masons are bad, in fact most aren’t bad
True, but I'm not taking chances.
It's on the bad side of the stupidity spectrum to even join knowing what we know
99% of pit bulls are great dogs… but are you trying to find out that 1% that will fuck you all the way up?
And humans are far less than 99%
Is the pic legit? What is the context?
She claims the shirt was sent to her as a gag, but you do sorta have to question her posting it as you can't really not question it....
Been kind of a lot of known people having some kind of Israeli/mossad connection exposed on socials in the last few days.....
The Q post… Shifty Schiffs son and the Mossad shirt.
If anything, that picture is mocking Mossad. Like if someone wears a t-shirt making fun of Hillary's body count and is accused of being Hillary sympathizer.
Even her 2019 tweet is a very clever way of bringing "Mossad" into the conversation about Israel.
Oh, and the best way to know who the controlled opposition are - casually smearing SoF.
Haha, this phrase reminds me of the time a few years ago when my friends living in California started claiming "They cant afford not to buy a hybrid car"
her shirt can be taken more than one way. use discernment people.
I dont know much about her, but from what I see here, I think she is a very clever redpill pusher. Good on her!
But the cross in the background…
The 'but the cross' reaction may be the very reason for it's presence, awareness of the other sides symbols makes them easy to use against them so I tend to be skeptical of anything done demonstratively, especially if it contradicts something worse being implied....
Exactly, I always read the room, In sales for 30 years, Zoom took it to a new level .., they set the stage. Everyone does it consciously or unconsciously.
Don't really trust anyone at this point, and speaking of points dude makes a few good ones..
You dont trust anyone, but just accept his claims as "making good points". Thats trusting someone.
No, that would be blindly accepting what he said as gospel, discerning the value and validity of something said is not the same as trusting someone.
I don't trust Q either but so far it checks out so discounting it just because I don't trust Q would be stupid.....
I suggest you dig into all the smears he states matter-of-factly and you will understand the true purpose of people like this.
This tactic is called FUD - fear, uncertainty and doubt. Lot of accusations based on half truths, omissions and out of context information to drive a narrative.
Brings attention where it is needed, "Mossad" for the masses.