Leading report “BREAKING: Department of Defense consultant says that the United States Space Force has proof that the 2020 election was stolen, but that the information was withheld in order to avoid the outbreak of civil war.” - receipts and more sources wanted, the dam has to break eventually
(twitter.com)
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (171)
sorted by:
If they are just repeating with Dr. Jan said. This is a great thing.
I would assume the delay means they spent time verifying this somehow.
Yeah, not zero information behind this, no? Also, if it is Halper, its not BREAKING.
Halper is still a BIG question mark, unless one is sucking on the hopium pipe (IMO).
Trump said she's amazing. Do you trust Trump or not?
Did you get vaccinated, then? Can I assume yes?
And to avoid any misinterpretation, I'll explain more directly:
We are in a 5G pysop war. DJT says things, but we do not always know WHY he says things. That takes thinking and analysis. Do I trust DJT? 100%. Did I take the vaccinations? No. The world needs people who will think, use reasoning and analysis. This is one of the goals of the Q operation. A simplistic "Trump said she's amazing so she MUST be legitimate" doesn't cut the mustard. There is a LOT more to consider. THAT is using logic. Not just assuming that one's own conclusions are right for whatever reason.
I'm sucking it pretty hard on her, not gonna lie, but I'm ready to be let down 😂
Well, I think some comparison is worthwhile. We've seen Q hints and inspirations from persons very well established with DJT and as Q+, with Q: Kash Patel, Gen. Flynn, Dan Scavino, DJT himself.
But we've also seen many unestablished people jump up and jump forward all of a sudden, citing inside knowledge and secret contacts, etc, stating various things. Charlie Ward, Stew Peters, and MANY others. Who, in my estimation, are grifters or disinfo operatives.
Someone noted the other day that Halper is advancing the "planes with 65 billion in gold" narrative that Charlie Ward first came out with. Make of this what one will.
Personally, I think the reading of the war via the narratives and reasoning through it are a far more powerful means of accessing hopermectin than these sorts of 'too good to be true and rather obvious' (IMO) insider knowledge 'drops'.
Meanwhile, onwards....
Yea, I think people just crave to hear it come out of "someone important"'s mouth (me included)... must be some sort of psycological yearning in a person... but regardless if she's legit or not, "the reading of the war via the narratives and reasoning through it" is the only safe option imo
I think the same about Halper as well.
I am 50/50 on her.
Hmmmm....