So we should just ignore what Q said about having to introduce evidence legally?
Yes, that's exactly how you fix corruption, by playing by the rules and having laws changed that should be changed.
Take Roe Vs Wade. Did we have that reversed by going around shooting people that had abortions, or did we take that case to the Supreme Court and get it changed, legally?
Or am I wrong? How many people did you shoot in the head to change that law? Or what illegal methods did you use to get that law changed that worked?
What difference does it matter to introduce things legally, if the law doesn't need to be followed?
You keep changing your argument.
Should we all live by our truths, or should we live by the laws of society?
You can't have both.
There's a difference between protesting, such as with civil disobedience and saying that our legal system should be ignored in favor of everyone living by their truths.
I don't think you really even understand yourself, what it is you believe. You just flip-flop around on the matters involved.
You miss the point, the legal system is corrupt.
You don't fix corruption by playing by its rules.
You're just afraid of blowing up the corrupt system.
You don't have faith enough to fight the corrupt system.
It really breaks down to not having faith in perfect things.
Stand up and fight.
So we should just ignore what Q said about having to introduce evidence legally?
Yes, that's exactly how you fix corruption, by playing by the rules and having laws changed that should be changed.
Take Roe Vs Wade. Did we have that reversed by going around shooting people that had abortions, or did we take that case to the Supreme Court and get it changed, legally?
Or am I wrong? How many people did you shoot in the head to change that law? Or what illegal methods did you use to get that law changed that worked?
We're getting to that place where I ignore your post except for your first premise.
You can and should to both practices:
1: Introduce evidence according to the established system.
2: stand up to the corrupt system.
We're going to do both.
We might get in some trouble, but that is to be expected. The corrupt system does not just fall down, it's a war.
I did ignore the rest of that post.
:)
Of course you did, because you had no answer.
What difference does it matter to introduce things legally, if the law doesn't need to be followed?
You keep changing your argument.
Should we all live by our truths, or should we live by the laws of society?
You can't have both.
There's a difference between protesting, such as with civil disobedience and saying that our legal system should be ignored in favor of everyone living by their truths.
I don't think you really even understand yourself, what it is you believe. You just flip-flop around on the matters involved.