Like I said. I read him from the beginning. He was on the fence about Q.
He was doing analysis of its existence more than the info presented.
I tested that water with conversation.
You're too easily impressed by johnny come lately.
I'm glad if he's now understanding Q and neither he nor you always knew.
You should try having done this for over 50 years.
In March 2018 he wrote an open ended article about Q and in May 2018 he wrote this:
"Back in March of 2018 I wrote about #QAnon and #TheStorm. I deliberately played it “down the middle” so as to leave it open-ended, not taking a position, and letting the reader decide. Nonetheless, I would be doing you a disservice not to give you my perspective. This is not a game, but a serious matter about the essential nature of society and what is real. It is now beyond reasonable doubt that Q is Military Intelligence at the heart of the Trump."
administration.
In July he wrote my favorite of his articles, "WWG1WGA: THE GREATEST COMMUNICATIONS EVENT IN HISTORY [11 JUL 2018]"
Seems like a reasonable investigation, digestion, conclusion scenario to me, not a "johnny come lately" situation at all.
" I deliberately played it “down the middle” so as to leave it open-ended, not taking a position, and letting the reader decide."
A retroactive statement showing he didn't know but was guessing.
Which is a good for him actually, because had I or he, or anyone actually spelled out the Plan in great accurate detail, they would be cancelled and no longer alive.
I don't suggest leaving things for an audience to decide. Q for example gave factual statements.....and left the audience to discover as answers to questions....but the facts behind are facts..........not left to the audience to decide, but understand and accept. After doing the work. Not getting suggestions from self-proclaimed 'polymaths'.
Are you not a polymath?
What's the difference between a person born with autism and an autist?
One is born, one is made.
Cicada 3301 recruited polymaths for reasons.
Throwing down of snakes. Takes one to know one.
"I can't wait until everyone pretends to have always known."
Well, I imagine to somebody who's done this for over 50 years, then the early anons following Q would look like johnny-come-latelys. So what does "having done this for over 50 years" entail?
Inside Information and
Diligent burning of the midnight oil.
I'd add that all current systems, blackhat and white, are all derivation/deviations of eternal universal truths they use as power over those who don't see that.
Two on a high place. One truth. Only one of the two sees the All-in-One, One-in-All. The other uses it to rule the plain (matrix).
The battle is on the micro (revelations within) and the macro as they are enacted,
and is as old as the history of religion.
Like I said. I read him from the beginning. He was on the fence about Q. He was doing analysis of its existence more than the info presented. I tested that water with conversation. You're too easily impressed by johnny come lately. I'm glad if he's now understanding Q and neither he nor you always knew. You should try having done this for over 50 years.
In March 2018 he wrote an open ended article about Q and in May 2018 he wrote this:
"Back in March of 2018 I wrote about #QAnon and #TheStorm. I deliberately played it “down the middle” so as to leave it open-ended, not taking a position, and letting the reader decide. Nonetheless, I would be doing you a disservice not to give you my perspective. This is not a game, but a serious matter about the essential nature of society and what is real. It is now beyond reasonable doubt that Q is Military Intelligence at the heart of the Trump." administration.
In July he wrote my favorite of his articles, "WWG1WGA: THE GREATEST COMMUNICATIONS EVENT IN HISTORY [11 JUL 2018]"
Seems like a reasonable investigation, digestion, conclusion scenario to me, not a "johnny come lately" situation at all.
All of his writings are open source. https://www.onq.martingeddes.com/
" I deliberately played it “down the middle” so as to leave it open-ended, not taking a position, and letting the reader decide."
A retroactive statement showing he didn't know but was guessing.
Which is a good for him actually, because had I or he, or anyone actually spelled out the Plan in great accurate detail, they would be cancelled and no longer alive.
I don't suggest leaving things for an audience to decide. Q for example gave factual statements.....and left the audience to discover as answers to questions....but the facts behind are facts..........not left to the audience to decide, but understand and accept. After doing the work. Not getting suggestions from self-proclaimed 'polymaths'.
Are you not a polymath? What's the difference between a person born with autism and an autist? One is born, one is made.
Cicada 3301 recruited polymaths for reasons. Throwing down of snakes. Takes one to know one.
"I can't wait until everyone pretends to have always known."
Well, I imagine to somebody who's done this for over 50 years, then the early anons following Q would look like johnny-come-latelys. So what does "having done this for over 50 years" entail?
Knowing the playbook inside and out.
And how was that knowing the playbook inside and out achieved?
Inside Information and Diligent burning of the midnight oil.
I'd add that all current systems, blackhat and white, are all derivation/deviations of eternal universal truths they use as power over those who don't see that.
Two on a high place. One truth. Only one of the two sees the All-in-One, One-in-All. The other uses it to rule the plain (matrix).
The battle is on the micro (revelations within) and the macro as they are enacted, and is as old as the history of religion.