Herridge has been in my "Almost Certainly a Spook" file for like 10+ years. But also I find that a lot of her reporting seems fairly even-handed and objective. She's probably one of those "tell you nine truths so I can tell you one lie" kinda spooks. But I still read her.
Yeah, I've found her interesting. Dave of X22 often uses her as a source in his reports and, as far as I know, she's the only journalist/ investigative reporter employed by any of the legacy fake news media that Dave uses.
So that's a source. And the motivation of that source is known - to protect his client.
One of the ABC reporters tweeted today. And it seems like two things are going on.
Meadows does not seem to have an immunity deal RIGHT NOW.
Meadows testified to the grand jury back in MARCH under court ordered immunity.
So this is before the Jack Smith Indictment of Trump. Mark Meadows is an "undicted co-conspirator" in that indictment.
So we don't know if Meadows has a deal to flip or is trying to negotiate a deal to flip RIGHT NOW.
This is what ABC said about the court ordered immunity
Under the immunity order from Smith's team, the information Meadows provided to the grand jury earlier this year can't be used against him in a federal prosecution.
That immunity came after a lawyer for Meadows requested that his client be immunized to testify before the grand jury, sources familiar with the matter said. A senior Justice Department official signed off on the request and an immunity order was then issued by U.S. District Court Judge James Boasberg, the chief judge at the federal court in Washington, D.C., days before Meadows appeared before the grand jury in March, sources said.
Had Meadows not been granted immunity, prosecutors expected him to invoke his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination, sources said.
https://nitter.net/CBS_Herridge/status/1716940274570604757
Aren't ALL of their stories inaccurate?
Herridge has been in my "Almost Certainly a Spook" file for like 10+ years. But also I find that a lot of her reporting seems fairly even-handed and objective. She's probably one of those "tell you nine truths so I can tell you one lie" kinda spooks. But I still read her.
Yeah, I've found her interesting. Dave of X22 often uses her as a source in his reports and, as far as I know, she's the only journalist/ investigative reporter employed by any of the legacy fake news media that Dave uses.
She's Cee Eye Ayy as far as I am concerned. But again, I think she's 9 truths + 1 lie, in how she positions herself. So worth hearing.
Do we have any sources for this beyond a tweet?
Not that a lack of sources ever stops the fake news media from running with a story. I just want us to be better than them!
The tweet is quoting Mark Meadows lawyer.
So that's a source. And the motivation of that source is known - to protect his client.
One of the ABC reporters tweeted today. And it seems like two things are going on.
Meadows does not seem to have an immunity deal RIGHT NOW.
Meadows testified to the grand jury back in MARCH under court ordered immunity.
So this is before the Jack Smith Indictment of Trump. Mark Meadows is an "undicted co-conspirator" in that indictment.
So we don't know if Meadows has a deal to flip or is trying to negotiate a deal to flip RIGHT NOW.
This is what ABC said about the court ordered immunity
https://x.com/KFaulders/status/1717161779577417908?s=20
A question I have is why is this coming out now....if they are talking about conversations that happened back in March.
I'm thinking that some lawyers have gotten discovery on Meadows grand jury testimony. Meadows is a defendant in Georgia along with other defendants.
So it's possible this info was included in the discovery materials in GA.