Everyone is not grammatically perfect. I don't think we were "told" to watch stuff like that for anyone other than POTUS and the Q drops. They likely have proofreaders that will fix stupid grammatical errors and leave the intentional stuff in the messages.
I'm only a mediocre online participant, but I don't have nearly the same levels of errors, halts, and skips. It signifies either clumsiness (he is not a good typist) or inattention. Since one can always review before hitting the "send" button, there seems little excuse.
But the point that calls out to me is the contradiction between the purpose of communication and the tolerance of errors. The purpose is to transmit a clear message. This post of Patel's is a classic instance of signal / noise ratio, and he deliberately allows that ratio to be low...which abandons the purpose of quality communication.
Plus, the whole challenge seems juvenile. The explanation of being addled by drink may explain it---but what kind of personal discipline would permit him to think that "posting under the influence" is a good idea. Very strange all around.
can you link the post to verify it?
https://truthsocial.com/users/Kash/statuses/110716340985370869
So say that Elon is a Space Force guy or otherwise a white hat. Could it make sense to appear that he’s untrusted by the patriots?
Also, wtf is up with high rate of misspellings and grammatical errors?
Yeah. At least 7 errors. Seems odd.
It's a comm.
And equating him with Schiff? Maybe Podesta equates with Schiff. Child predators.
Everyone is not grammatically perfect. I don't think we were "told" to watch stuff like that for anyone other than POTUS and the Q drops. They likely have proofreaders that will fix stupid grammatical errors and leave the intentional stuff in the messages.
I'm only a mediocre online participant, but I don't have nearly the same levels of errors, halts, and skips. It signifies either clumsiness (he is not a good typist) or inattention. Since one can always review before hitting the "send" button, there seems little excuse.
But the point that calls out to me is the contradiction between the purpose of communication and the tolerance of errors. The purpose is to transmit a clear message. This post of Patel's is a classic instance of signal / noise ratio, and he deliberately allows that ratio to be low...which abandons the purpose of quality communication.
Plus, the whole challenge seems juvenile. The explanation of being addled by drink may explain it---but what kind of personal discipline would permit him to think that "posting under the influence" is a good idea. Very strange all around.
Drunk, coked up?