As with all of us here, I struggle understanding Trump's position on the jab. He did encourage people to take it. Did any of us who were taught by Q to think for ourselves actually take it because Trump said to? No. Did sheep listen to Trump? No. Orange man bad. Can he admit it was a depop bioweapon? All he says is he didn't mandate it but Biden did. Why did he do that EO to approve mRNA technology, complete with self assembling nano tech? I can't figure that one out. Was he duped? Surely not. Are the USA military actually dying from it? Seems so, there is a lot of evidence they are, and it is undisputed that they have had a lot of patriots leave the military. Some say that's deliberate so that it can be replaced by UN soldiers who will then fight to kill off armed civilians. I agree with David's final statement, which aligns with Q: only at the precipice will people find the will to change.
I can't understand that, Trumps involvement in the Jab either. One can say hind sight is 2020 but if he was playing 5D chess has been stated so many times, the what he did, he did on purpose. If he was psyop'ed the he undoubtedly on the issue was not playing chess at all, but poor checkers.
Why would Trump allow something that will kill millions. What possible future victory can justify that. Look at the 100's of thousands of kids that are being trafficked with Trump loss, and Biden steal.
Are we going to claim that when the nukes start dropping that this was necessary to wake up more people.
The idea that the damage of recent years was all preventable by some (magic) wand contrasts with the reality of the past century, where hundreds of millions were murdered and thousands of millions of lives severely and detrimentally impacted plus the notion that if the Cabal is not stopped, they would do things that make the 20th century look like a cake-walk.
Also, that if the people do NOT wake up, that somehow magically something can still be done to fix everything vs the awareness that the cause of the situation is populations brainwashed into trance and over time removed from the actual governance situation.
As if the people waking up is an option that we'd like, as opposed to an absolute necessity without which the solution cannot be accomplished in any meaningful form.
So, short-circuit the possibility of any future victory in order to assuage the painful suffering of hundreds of thousands or even millions in the current time, or hold out, grit one's teeth, make the painful and unremittingly difficult choices to win no matter what, because defeat means signing the future of ALL humanity over to permanent 1984-like slavery for the foreseeable future (1000s of years)?
I'm not saying I understand DJTs involvement in the jab thing. But in my view, what is actually at stake in this war is not just this generation, or the next. It's much, much more.
From that perspective, I try to focus on the bigger picture.
FWIW, I used to follow and really like MIA, but I stopped listening in on him. I don't feel like his perspectives really take in the whole larger situation. I much more resonate with the guys over at Defected, who I find much more encouraging, uplifting and constructive.
But, that's only just a personal preference. Haven't listened to MIA for about a year or more.
If you want to justify that it is acceptable to perpetrate global genocide against what might occur if Trump had not allowed this, I think it's a tough sale. I do understand what you are saying, but if a large portion of the globe are murdered by the jab, if humanity is irretrievably changed though use of crisper technology that by and large was kicked in to high gear with Trumps actions, I don't see what could be worse.
Also I think your making the argument that one can use evil to destroy evil, and this would be a mistake.
Oh, apologies. I didn't recognize that this was all about the jab for you. I thought you were refering to all the other negative experiences of the past several years.
In that case, I'll withhold further comments, except that as far as I'm concerned, I think we have to wait more to find out the true and actual impact of the jab. I'm not attached to the 'large portion of the globe being murdered by this' view; I prefer to think optimistically while the evidence rolls in. But as I stated, I don't have any hard and fast opinion on Trump and the Jab. I'm leaving that one on the shelf for the moment.
I am most certainly not making the argument that one can use evil to destroy evil, and have many times made my case on GAW why such a view is unacceptable.
(3) he then acted not surprised at all that people booed him!
So why does he encourage us to take it, knowing that we are going to boo at that!? Why even say it to us?
My point is, it is somehow even more odd than just him promoting the vaccine. He even promoted it to a crowd that he knew would boo him for saying it! What is the point of that?
The only thing I can think of is that maybe most of the batches were ok, but some of the batches killed people, and on balance, having most of the batches out there helping people generally improved the statistics of survival, even if some of the Cabal batches also go through?
He has a team of stat people for sure, and maybe due to multiple converging circumstances, having Trump's vaccine out there minimized total death in the model they used.
As with all of us here, I struggle understanding Trump's position on the jab. He did encourage people to take it.
We know that some batches were deadly, some not so deadly, and others benign. Possibly, things were done to undermine safeguards that had been put in place.
As with all of us here, I struggle understanding Trump's position on the jab. He did encourage people to take it. Did any of us who were taught by Q to think for ourselves actually take it because Trump said to? No. Did sheep listen to Trump? No. Orange man bad. Can he admit it was a depop bioweapon? All he says is he didn't mandate it but Biden did. Why did he do that EO to approve mRNA technology, complete with self assembling nano tech? I can't figure that one out. Was he duped? Surely not. Are the USA military actually dying from it? Seems so, there is a lot of evidence they are, and it is undisputed that they have had a lot of patriots leave the military. Some say that's deliberate so that it can be replaced by UN soldiers who will then fight to kill off armed civilians. I agree with David's final statement, which aligns with Q: only at the precipice will people find the will to change.
I can't understand that, Trumps involvement in the Jab either. One can say hind sight is 2020 but if he was playing 5D chess has been stated so many times, the what he did, he did on purpose. If he was psyop'ed the he undoubtedly on the issue was not playing chess at all, but poor checkers.
Why would Trump allow something that will kill millions. What possible future victory can justify that. Look at the 100's of thousands of kids that are being trafficked with Trump loss, and Biden steal.
Are we going to claim that when the nukes start dropping that this was necessary to wake up more people.
Very good high information interview.
The idea that the damage of recent years was all preventable by some (magic) wand contrasts with the reality of the past century, where hundreds of millions were murdered and thousands of millions of lives severely and detrimentally impacted plus the notion that if the Cabal is not stopped, they would do things that make the 20th century look like a cake-walk.
Also, that if the people do NOT wake up, that somehow magically something can still be done to fix everything vs the awareness that the cause of the situation is populations brainwashed into trance and over time removed from the actual governance situation.
As if the people waking up is an option that we'd like, as opposed to an absolute necessity without which the solution cannot be accomplished in any meaningful form.
So, short-circuit the possibility of any future victory in order to assuage the painful suffering of hundreds of thousands or even millions in the current time, or hold out, grit one's teeth, make the painful and unremittingly difficult choices to win no matter what, because defeat means signing the future of ALL humanity over to permanent 1984-like slavery for the foreseeable future (1000s of years)?
I'm not saying I understand DJTs involvement in the jab thing. But in my view, what is actually at stake in this war is not just this generation, or the next. It's much, much more.
From that perspective, I try to focus on the bigger picture.
FWIW, I used to follow and really like MIA, but I stopped listening in on him. I don't feel like his perspectives really take in the whole larger situation. I much more resonate with the guys over at Defected, who I find much more encouraging, uplifting and constructive.
But, that's only just a personal preference. Haven't listened to MIA for about a year or more.
If you want to justify that it is acceptable to perpetrate global genocide against what might occur if Trump had not allowed this, I think it's a tough sale. I do understand what you are saying, but if a large portion of the globe are murdered by the jab, if humanity is irretrievably changed though use of crisper technology that by and large was kicked in to high gear with Trumps actions, I don't see what could be worse.
Also I think your making the argument that one can use evil to destroy evil, and this would be a mistake.
Thanks Muck.
Oh, apologies. I didn't recognize that this was all about the jab for you. I thought you were refering to all the other negative experiences of the past several years.
In that case, I'll withhold further comments, except that as far as I'm concerned, I think we have to wait more to find out the true and actual impact of the jab. I'm not attached to the 'large portion of the globe being murdered by this' view; I prefer to think optimistically while the evidence rolls in. But as I stated, I don't have any hard and fast opinion on Trump and the Jab. I'm leaving that one on the shelf for the moment.
I am most certainly not making the argument that one can use evil to destroy evil, and have many times made my case on GAW why such a view is unacceptable.
Agree.
I remember watching him give a speech where
(1) he encouraged people to take the vaccine,
(2) people booed him!
(3) he then acted not surprised at all that people booed him!
So why does he encourage us to take it, knowing that we are going to boo at that!? Why even say it to us?
My point is, it is somehow even more odd than just him promoting the vaccine. He even promoted it to a crowd that he knew would boo him for saying it! What is the point of that?
The only thing I can think of is that maybe most of the batches were ok, but some of the batches killed people, and on balance, having most of the batches out there helping people generally improved the statistics of survival, even if some of the Cabal batches also go through?
He has a team of stat people for sure, and maybe due to multiple converging circumstances, having Trump's vaccine out there minimized total death in the model they used.
I suppose we will find out eventually.
My thoughts exactly, top to bottom.
And well said.
We know that some batches were deadly, some not so deadly, and others benign. Possibly, things were done to undermine safeguards that had been put in place.
Also, battle tactics Mr Ryan.
Why wasn't it the same jab as tested? 🤔
sticky copy here
https://communities.win/c/Martin/p/17rlw4HfSE/