And allow for the machine 'operators' to adjudicate ballots which the machine cannot 100% determine the mark. (remember the sharpie trick? voters were handed sharpies to use while in line... machines couldn't read sharpie ink... the machine managers were allowed to adjudicate (choose whomever they liked) the ballots and enter the vote manually, after the voter left the building.
The right way to do it is to have three different contracts with three unconnected American institutions to count all the votes independently. The results can then be compared to the identify mistakes. A hand count can then be done on a small subset of votes to ensure absolutely no fraud is occurring.
The Republicans can pick one group, the Democrats the second and the secretary can pick the last one.
Having a single Democrat connected company count votes is insane.
And the penalty for ANY illegal actions must be death. The punishment MUST fit the crime. Stealing a vote is like stealing a life. If the people counting are afraid of the consequences for cheating, there will be no more cheating.
Without machines how do we count the votes
By hand, paper ballots, one day voting.
Woah there cowboy. Paper ballots? Counting by hand? Having a vote total in a day? What kind of witchcraft are you talking about?
I know, I know. 🤪
Preferably with a fresh shift if possible, and with a ton more people on staff.
Unless you are expecting a skeleton crew of inspectors who already did 18 hours of work that day to accurately count ballots...
I agree that you would need several people to do the job. What do you think about having the national guard count them, with civilian observers?
The problem is the machines are specifically designed to be able to alter votes while obfuscating the trail that shows the votes were altered
And allow for the machine 'operators' to adjudicate ballots which the machine cannot 100% determine the mark. (remember the sharpie trick? voters were handed sharpies to use while in line... machines couldn't read sharpie ink... the machine managers were allowed to adjudicate (choose whomever they liked) the ballots and enter the vote manually, after the voter left the building.
Wen jail?
LOL.
France has a population of 65 million and uses paper ballots and gets the voting done in one day. Georgia has a population of 9.5 million.
If they want to use paper ballots, it will work just fine. There's no way that human cannot use paper/pen.
Unless you count 1, 2, 5, 8, 15. Maybe some of the people cannot count.
Well, there's proof positive of vote machine error.😜😜😜
With better machines.
The right way to do it is to have three different contracts with three unconnected American institutions to count all the votes independently. The results can then be compared to the identify mistakes. A hand count can then be done on a small subset of votes to ensure absolutely no fraud is occurring.
The Republicans can pick one group, the Democrats the second and the secretary can pick the last one.
Having a single Democrat connected company count votes is insane.
And the penalty for ANY illegal actions must be death. The punishment MUST fit the crime. Stealing a vote is like stealing a life. If the people counting are afraid of the consequences for cheating, there will be no more cheating.