Your exactly right. And here is the u.s code to hold any official who deprived you of your right to free speech or any other constitutional right.
I would also think that people who had loved ones murdered from covid protocols that were forced under the color of law, this would be how you go after the doctors and hospitals for criminal liability.
I don't know the verbiage, but the constitution already states that laws cannot be created to supersede the constitution (we know they're not honoring that now). So, yeah, I love how you've put it: a law to follow the law is where we are as a broken "constitutional republic." This has to be for optics and to make some of the normies paying attention, "hmmmm?"
We shouldn't even be discussing this. The First Amendment is perfectly clear. It's time to start severely punishing government employees who violate their oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. Dismissal is a good place to start.
Why would we need a bill? The first Amendment already covers this.
I guess it was not working as well in practice as it should have in theory.
Whobwill enforce this new law. Same guys enforcing the 1st amendment? Maybe this is the point of the bill. Get us talking.
True. What is the penalty?
18 USC 241 and 242 .....
My question would be: what is the reason no one is being hunted under this criminal statute?
And what then is Rand Paul's law gonna change?
Faithfully executing the laws of the US? back to square one.
These are my exact thoughts
https://www.justice.gov/crt/deprivation-rights-under-color-law
Your exactly right. And here is the u.s code to hold any official who deprived you of your right to free speech or any other constitutional right.
I would also think that people who had loved ones murdered from covid protocols that were forced under the color of law, this would be how you go after the doctors and hospitals for criminal liability.
A law to tell the criminals they have to follow the law. That should work.
A law that comes with enumerated penalties for violation might catch their attention.
There is already penalties for civil rights violations.
What good if not enforced?
Civil rights vs Constitutionally protected rights ..... Different jurisdiction.
I don't know the verbiage, but the constitution already states that laws cannot be created to supersede the constitution (we know they're not honoring that now). So, yeah, I love how you've put it: a law to follow the law is where we are as a broken "constitutional republic." This has to be for optics and to make some of the normies paying attention, "hmmmm?"
Wtf is the Constitution for? Maybe this is proof it's been suspended since 2000 like I've see. Some claim.
Why did this take so long to happen ?
We shouldn't even be discussing this. The First Amendment is perfectly clear. It's time to start severely punishing government employees who violate their oath to uphold and defend the Constitution. Dismissal is a good place to start.
Backup Video
https://web.archive.org/web/20231121013030/https://rumble.com/v3ww1vg-sen.-rand-paul-introduces-bill-to-outlaw-government-censorship-of-constitut.html
That’s…redundant. But I’ll take it.