It is possible that Ben Franklin was a double-agent of some sort. Using his family name and ties to infiltrate the cabal and Freemasonry organizations while still working to create a Republic as competition for the Power of the British Throne which he understood keenly.
Note the people on the $1, $2, $5, $10, $20, $50 bills were all enemies of the cabal and the Central Bank. Franklin (on the $100) is the only one that his "crimes against the cabal" are not easily identified. Maybe they viewed him as a secret society traitor? It seems to be a pattern that the cabal/Central Bank puts its enemies on its bills, at least in the U.S. It is a kind of an ironic back-handed honorific, imo. Usually it is for something they did against the bankers.
$ 1 George Washington (opposition to foreign banks and entanglements)
$ 2 Thomas Jefferson (opposition to cabal and its centralization of power)
$ 5 Abraham Lincoln (shortened Civil War and no-debt Greenback)
$ 10 Alexander Hamilton (double-agent? limited scope/term of Bank?)
$ 20 Andrew Jackson (got rid of 2nd Central Bank)
$ 50 Ulysses Grant (countered cabal and prevented 3rd Central Bank 1870s)
$ 100 Benjamin Franklin (double-agent? Supported provisions limiting power?)
$ 500 William McKinley (assassinated by cabal for "free silver" currency)
$1000 Grover Cleveland (2nd term stolen by cabal, blocked Central Bank)
Hamilton was a Rothschild agent. He obligated us to the first rothchild bank as soon as he became Washington's sec treasury. War of 1812 was started because we didn't re sign the co tract in 1811. We signed in 1816 and the war ended. We didn't win like they claim. Back on the central banks title and the brit fleet stayed for 4 more years in New York haRbor and forc3d collection of taxes from shipborne goods. We couldn't make them leave.
Agreed that he most likely was a banker agent prior to 1791 Bank#1. The question is why include him in the “humiliation ritual” with banker enemies if he was forever one of theirs? This is essentially the same question I am asking about Franklin. Neither fits the pattern, imo.
The answer might be discovered in their biographies if they are factual and authentic representations.
It is possible that Ben Franklin was a double-agent of some sort. Using his family name and ties to infiltrate the cabal and Freemasonry organizations while still working to create a Republic as competition for the Power of the British Throne which he understood keenly.
Note the people on the $1, $2, $5, $10, $20, $50 bills were all enemies of the cabal and the Central Bank. Franklin (on the $100) is the only one that his "crimes against the cabal" are not easily identified. Maybe they viewed him as a secret society traitor? It seems to be a pattern that the cabal/Central Bank puts its enemies on its bills, at least in the U.S. It is a kind of an ironic back-handed honorific, imo. Usually it is for something they did against the bankers.
$ 1 George Washington (opposition to foreign banks and entanglements)
$ 2 Thomas Jefferson (opposition to cabal and its centralization of power)
$ 5 Abraham Lincoln (shortened Civil War and no-debt Greenback)
$ 10 Alexander Hamilton (double-agent? limited scope/term of Bank?)
$ 20 Andrew Jackson (got rid of 2nd Central Bank)
$ 50 Ulysses Grant (countered cabal and prevented 3rd Central Bank 1870s)
$ 100 Benjamin Franklin (double-agent? Supported provisions limiting power?)
$ 500 William McKinley (assassinated by cabal for "free silver" currency)
$1000 Grover Cleveland (2nd term stolen by cabal, blocked Central Bank)
https://www.thoughtco.com/faces-on-us-currency-4153995
super interesting post...i didn't even know there had been bills for $500 and $1000.
Yes, they are no longer in circulation.
Wasn't there a ten thousand bill
Yes, but it appears it was only used for inter-bank transfers, and not made available to the public. Also, no longer in circulation. https://www.silverrecyclers.com/blog/10000-dollar-bill.aspx
Hamilton was a Rothschild agent. He obligated us to the first rothchild bank as soon as he became Washington's sec treasury. War of 1812 was started because we didn't re sign the co tract in 1811. We signed in 1816 and the war ended. We didn't win like they claim. Back on the central banks title and the brit fleet stayed for 4 more years in New York haRbor and forc3d collection of taxes from shipborne goods. We couldn't make them leave.
Agreed that he most likely was a banker agent prior to 1791 Bank#1. The question is why include him in the “humiliation ritual” with banker enemies if he was forever one of theirs? This is essentially the same question I am asking about Franklin. Neither fits the pattern, imo.
The answer might be discovered in their biographies if they are factual and authentic representations.
You might be onto something fren