I'm still looking for proof that it exists at all, or that it was actually released. Where were the excess deaths, other than medical malpractice? Why was the average age of COVID death higher than the average lifespan?
I don't believe the real virus was released. I believe they were going to, but it was shut down. This was the flu, and nothing more. I don't believe for a second that COVID, as it was designed, was released. If it was, it was the biggest dud in the history of duds. The "cure" was the weapon. The COVID fear was the driver.
If it was out there, why did they have to fake positives with PCR tests? Even if Covid was an all-but-harmless virus, it would have been picked up by a test designed to detect it.
Instead, they’re still using this test that isn’t a test for anything, because it hits on literally everything. Almost four years later.
Exactly. They used a test that was designed to pick up random junk. They knew full well it would give positive results for any and everything. They knew that would spread fear, and lead people to take shots they don't need, and WILL harm them.
I tried to tell people, just because they call it a COVID test, does not mean it was designed to test for COVID. It's no different than putting "COVID-19 Test" on your broom, sweeping the floor, then calling dust bunnies COVID-19.
It's not that PCR "hits on everything," but rather that the PCR process MANUFACTURES fragments that DID NOT PREVIOUSLY EXIST, and then "hits" on this stuff that the process itself created.
It is GUARANTEED to show a "positive" result -- as long as enough cycles are used.
"Gain of function research" can ONLY mean one of two things:
(1) They believe viruses are real, and are trying to figure out how to make them MORE harmful. This is a real possibility, since it wasn't until April 2021 that Stefan Lanka did the FIRST EVER control study, which proved that viruses do not exist -- so maybe that idiot/scumbag Fauci really believes his own bullshit, and why not make millions of dollars off the scam while your at it?; or
(2) They know viruses either are not real, or they have tried to make them harmful and failed (because viruses are not real), so this research is actually about how to make vaccines and/or aerosol sprays or other means of transmission harmful for depop/control purposes.
Either way, the research is money down a rat hole to make evil people wealthy.
I'm still looking for proof that it exists at all, or that it was actually released. Where were the excess deaths, other than medical malpractice? Why was the average age of COVID death higher than the average lifespan?
I don't believe the real virus was released. I believe they were going to, but it was shut down. This was the flu, and nothing more. I don't believe for a second that COVID, as it was designed, was released. If it was, it was the biggest dud in the history of duds. The "cure" was the weapon. The COVID fear was the driver.
If it was out there, why did they have to fake positives with PCR tests? Even if Covid was an all-but-harmless virus, it would have been picked up by a test designed to detect it.
Instead, they’re still using this test that isn’t a test for anything, because it hits on literally everything. Almost four years later.
Exactly. They used a test that was designed to pick up random junk. They knew full well it would give positive results for any and everything. They knew that would spread fear, and lead people to take shots they don't need, and WILL harm them.
I tried to tell people, just because they call it a COVID test, does not mean it was designed to test for COVID. It's no different than putting "COVID-19 Test" on your broom, sweeping the floor, then calling dust bunnies COVID-19.
It's actually worse than that.
It's not that PCR "hits on everything," but rather that the PCR process MANUFACTURES fragments that DID NOT PREVIOUSLY EXIST, and then "hits" on this stuff that the process itself created.
It is GUARANTEED to show a "positive" result -- as long as enough cycles are used.
Exactly.
"Gain of function research" can ONLY mean one of two things:
(1) They believe viruses are real, and are trying to figure out how to make them MORE harmful. This is a real possibility, since it wasn't until April 2021 that Stefan Lanka did the FIRST EVER control study, which proved that viruses do not exist -- so maybe that idiot/scumbag Fauci really believes his own bullshit, and why not make millions of dollars off the scam while your at it?; or
(2) They know viruses either are not real, or they have tried to make them harmful and failed (because viruses are not real), so this research is actually about how to make vaccines and/or aerosol sprays or other means of transmission harmful for depop/control purposes.
Either way, the research is money down a rat hole to make evil people wealthy.