Filings reveal Jack Smith may never have been PROPERLY APPOINTED as Special Counsel. 🍿👀🔥
🐸 YA DON'T SAY? 🐸
If proven, this would render all of his legal acts void..
"Private citizen Jack Smith lacks standing to petition the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari before judgement in United States v. Trump."
"Anyone now in jail, or subject to a plea bargain, with Jack Smith can ask to be released because Jack Smith is, in truth, a private citizen. The judge in the Florida District Court classified documents case is under the jurisdiction of the 11th Circuit and is not bound by D.C. Circuit precedent. Any litigant in a case before her can argue that Jack Smith is not a lawfully appointed officer of the United States." -Reason
👉🏻 https://twitter.com/ChuckCallesto/status/1737992391590580591?s=19
I wish there was some sauce, apart from a tweet.
This is coming from Edwin Meeses amicus brief to SCOTUS.
https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/12/former-reagan-ag-edwin-meese-claims-legal-filing/
https://www.abajournal.com/news/article/was-jack-smiths-appointment-unconstitutional-he-has-no-more-authority-than-taylor-swift-amicus-brief-argues
The Special Council law lapsed in 1999 and was not renewed requiring the President to name a special officer with the advise and consent of the Senate. Garland had no power to do so hence Smiths appointment is unconstitutional.
Thanks for that. I believe they are onto something there.
Sauce - https://reason.com/volokh/2023/12/21/jack-smith-lacks-standing-to-file-in-the-supreme-court-because-he-is-only-a-private-citizen/
It all fake!!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0dRPNxFBPs