OK. The clip is still 2 years old, and is based on someone's interpretation, as opposed to facts.
If gain of function research was conducted (it was) and if an engineered virus was released this would be the basis for claiming that the US was attacked as an act of war and that this would constitute the foundation for devolution.
If none of that ever happened, on what basis could DJT state that the covid virus attack was 'worse than pearl harbor'?
It seems pretty clear that there was GOF work going on and that an engineered virus was released. There were some very severe situations, i.e. China, Italy, etc, that represent something more than a flu situation.
This is all beside the fact that the Pandemic was by and large a scandemic psyop. The PCR testing they used was extremely bogus, could NOT distinguish between influenza and the supposed covid virus, and was used to essentially run the psyop in places where the covid virus was very limited if at all present. (i.e. Australia).
But none of that is evidence that the virus did not exist or that it has never been isolated.
I accept that you have your own conclusions and beliefs : "I don't buy it that there's a virus called Covid" but we're supposed to be filtering information based on facts, data, objective reasoning and research, not simply treating our beliefs as if they are facts. Because they aren't.
Which is why its so critical to distinguish between one's own opinion + beliefs on one hand, and the facts and the evidence on the other.
Thanks. Counter narrative to which, exactly? That viruses exist, or that a distinct covid19 virus existed?
Recently, I saw something about a study done in Japan that 'proved' conclusively that the covid variants were all from engineered stock.
But to be honest, I don't have much interest in these issues, in general. What I do have interest in is how information is being shared and promulgated.
That said, the content you linked to gives the impression of being very well presented.
Thank you. The counter narrative in the doc and the team behind it mainly take the position that no virus has ever been isolated, especially SARS CoV2, which means that all the adjacent narratives - GoF, variants, non-pharma interventions, vaccines, shedding etc etc - are all disingenuous at best, deliberate disinfo/misinfo gatekeeper tactics at worst to preserve the trillion dollar allopathic medical complex. I don’t have a view either way yet as I am still evaluating and have a few more books etc to get through. (I am fully convinced vaccines are pseudoscience, maybe even a primary vector of cause of disease, to be avoided at all costs; as to the germ/terrain and virus/no virus arguments, I am still exploring these endlessly fascinating topics but one thing I am quite sure of: these are objective reality cornerstones, up there with moon landings, 9-11, globe earth, wars as rackets etc whereby if proven to be fake, could seriously undermine the whole edifice)
I’m not 100% sure in either direction regarding the virus, but GOF was definitely funded and attempted. How successful it was is up for debate, but there’s a paper trail of the research funding, so we know they at least tried.
OK. The clip is still 2 years old, and is based on someone's interpretation, as opposed to facts.
If gain of function research was conducted (it was) and if an engineered virus was released this would be the basis for claiming that the US was attacked as an act of war and that this would constitute the foundation for devolution.
If none of that ever happened, on what basis could DJT state that the covid virus attack was 'worse than pearl harbor'?
It seems pretty clear that there was GOF work going on and that an engineered virus was released. There were some very severe situations, i.e. China, Italy, etc, that represent something more than a flu situation.
This is all beside the fact that the Pandemic was by and large a scandemic psyop. The PCR testing they used was extremely bogus, could NOT distinguish between influenza and the supposed covid virus, and was used to essentially run the psyop in places where the covid virus was very limited if at all present. (i.e. Australia).
But none of that is evidence that the virus did not exist or that it has never been isolated.
I accept that you have your own conclusions and beliefs : "I don't buy it that there's a virus called Covid" but we're supposed to be filtering information based on facts, data, objective reasoning and research, not simply treating our beliefs as if they are facts. Because they aren't.
Which is why its so critical to distinguish between one's own opinion + beliefs on one hand, and the facts and the evidence on the other.
The Viral Delusion gives good counter narrative. Episode One is free but quite comprehensive (might require signup).
https://paradigmshift.uscreen.io/programs/episode-one-narrated-18-no-perth-2-72011-a0209a
Thanks. Counter narrative to which, exactly? That viruses exist, or that a distinct covid19 virus existed?
Recently, I saw something about a study done in Japan that 'proved' conclusively that the covid variants were all from engineered stock.
But to be honest, I don't have much interest in these issues, in general. What I do have interest in is how information is being shared and promulgated.
That said, the content you linked to gives the impression of being very well presented.
Thank you. The counter narrative in the doc and the team behind it mainly take the position that no virus has ever been isolated, especially SARS CoV2, which means that all the adjacent narratives - GoF, variants, non-pharma interventions, vaccines, shedding etc etc - are all disingenuous at best, deliberate disinfo/misinfo gatekeeper tactics at worst to preserve the trillion dollar allopathic medical complex. I don’t have a view either way yet as I am still evaluating and have a few more books etc to get through. (I am fully convinced vaccines are pseudoscience, maybe even a primary vector of cause of disease, to be avoided at all costs; as to the germ/terrain and virus/no virus arguments, I am still exploring these endlessly fascinating topics but one thing I am quite sure of: these are objective reality cornerstones, up there with moon landings, 9-11, globe earth, wars as rackets etc whereby if proven to be fake, could seriously undermine the whole edifice)
Hmmm....
a thoughtful reply.
I’m not 100% sure in either direction regarding the virus, but GOF was definitely funded and attempted. How successful it was is up for debate, but there’s a paper trail of the research funding, so we know they at least tried.
Pasteur admitted he was wrong
Worse than pearl harbor in a dozen ways. Doesn't mean it's real. One hell of a psyop to take a dangerous shot and steal a election.
Figuratively a destructive virus. It never existed.