There are videos that are cropped to exclude the planes and also videos where the approach of flight 175 is blocked by the building(s). The thing is, many of those uncropped and unedited videos clearly show Flight 175 at numerous angles on approach and at impact. The only 2 videos of Flight 11 that exist clearly show the plane impacting the North Tower.
Yes lots of ORIGINAL footage on the grounds for the explosion of 2nd tower NO PLANE just like at the pentagon even the original CNN footage says THERE NO PLANE
Isn't there videos of the twin towers exploding with no planes seen?
There are videos that are cropped to exclude the planes and also videos where the approach of flight 175 is blocked by the building(s). The thing is, many of those uncropped and unedited videos clearly show Flight 175 at numerous angles on approach and at impact. The only 2 videos of Flight 11 that exist clearly show the plane impacting the North Tower.
The CGI theory is bogus.
Does that include the video were the nose of the plane can be seen exiting from the backside of the building?
how do you know that was the nose of the plane ? That's a pretty big assumption and comes directly from the bogus CGI video I alluded to.
Very likely, that was one of the engines that passed completely through the building and was seen plummeting to the ground in numerous videos.
So I assume you saw that video? Then you tell me what was it? It sure looked like the nose of the same plane that hit the building.
Let me ask you this: Did the planes cause the collapse of the twin towers? That's the important question.
why is it "bogus?"
What about the video where the planes' wing is occluded by a background building, a clear layering error with CGI.
Yes lots of ORIGINAL footage on the grounds for the explosion of 2nd tower NO PLANE just like at the pentagon even the original CNN footage says THERE NO PLANE