Blacks Law Dictionary is basically worthless nowadays. It doesn't deal with current laws nor consider any of the overriding laws passed since. Anyone reading in there should probably be accompanied by their own current law degree in order to properly understand the differences with today's judicial system. Or one could try to hang some legal hat on it and "travel" the country... I'll see you on a good SovCit heckling video in short time I'm sure.
only place I hear of Blacks Law Dictionary is from SovCits... if I'm mistaken then oops. SovCits in any case really need heckled and brought back to reality anyways.
It depends on the version. When you go back in time, goto Archive.org and see the 4th edition, you'll notice two meanings. The first meaning has been dropped. Why? Because of the changes that every man is forcibly making into putting himself on equal standing with a corporation.
The previous state of a man = person before the law as his living body, as one and the same, without being a corporation, in his own right.
The word "person" is from Latin consisting of two words: per and sona, with the meaning of: by means of sound. In those days business was conducted not by paper contract but by the "yes" or "no" as the ultimate [de]claration of the will.
Of course it also relates to the masks worn by actors to impersonate another. In a way, this goes for all of us, as we are the symbiosis of matter alive and our spirit: consciousness.
Although not retained in English, the Germanic words: Leib / Lijf and leben/leven are of the same root. A CORPORATION is a LEICHNAHM = a dead body.
The word like = equal to, is derived from the Germanic: LEICHE/LIJK = a dead body. This is retained in English by the suffix: -y, making it an adjective to a "nomen"or name of a good, matter or entity.
The word "thing" does not apply here, as the word thing is derived from the Germanic/Nordic word: thing (speak: t-hing) meaning meeting to settle disputes, retained in Germanic languages as tag or dag. Anyone summoned to such a meeting is entitled to field a champion, an advocate ( somebody "moving towards" = ad, "the call" = voca ). The word lawyer is not meant to mean: sage: but is derived from two words: law = legen ( German) leggen ( Dutch) = that which is laid down and the word: yer meaning the one knowing.
The Dutch word: dingen as a verb, and the singular: ding (equal to thing in English) actually mean: attempting to obtain by negotiation. Interestingly, the word: krijgen is used in Dutch, to obtain a matter as a warrior.
Personally, I am still not sure why the word negotiation (from Latin) is a negation. It presumes to negate a got / goti. The spanish use the word negocios to indicate conducting business. And especially when responding to an inquiry about how it's going: muchos negocios = Little freetime. Cicero uses the word in his writings but mentions the word business and leisure seperately. Let's just say that the search for the meaning is still ongoing.
What Black's Law shows is the gradual changing of the meaning of words. And of course, it is not to our advantage, as it drags us deeper into babble-language.
These days, the laws themselves give the meaning of words. But this is far from complete, since these are based on a framework where the meanings have already changed.
This could be of interest: https://files.catbox.moe/p9rkoz.mp4
Things that make you go hmmm and wonder about Q drops and decodes etc....
Blacks Law Dictionary is basically worthless nowadays. It doesn't deal with current laws nor consider any of the overriding laws passed since. Anyone reading in there should probably be accompanied by their own current law degree in order to properly understand the differences with today's judicial system. Or one could try to hang some legal hat on it and "travel" the country... I'll see you on a good SovCit heckling video in short time I'm sure.
Black's Law after 5th edition don't include common law citations.
only place I hear of Blacks Law Dictionary is from SovCits... if I'm mistaken then oops. SovCits in any case really need heckled and brought back to reality anyways.
Oh jeez. SovCit jibberish/bullshite.
Conflating constitutional law with sovereign citizen bs is like conflating flat earth with conspiracies.
Who you trying to mislead?
you can have conspiracies without flat earth, but you can't have flat earth without conspiracies.
Likewise you can exercise common lore without the sovereign citizen bullshit.
It depends on the version. When you go back in time, goto Archive.org and see the 4th edition, you'll notice two meanings. The first meaning has been dropped. Why? Because of the changes that every man is forcibly making into putting himself on equal standing with a corporation.
The previous state of a man = person before the law as his living body, as one and the same, without being a corporation, in his own right.
The word "person" is from Latin consisting of two words: per and sona, with the meaning of: by means of sound. In those days business was conducted not by paper contract but by the "yes" or "no" as the ultimate [de]claration of the will.
Of course it also relates to the masks worn by actors to impersonate another. In a way, this goes for all of us, as we are the symbiosis of matter alive and our spirit: consciousness.
Although not retained in English, the Germanic words: Leib / Lijf and leben/leven are of the same root. A CORPORATION is a LEICHNAHM = a dead body.
The word like = equal to, is derived from the Germanic: LEICHE/LIJK = a dead body. This is retained in English by the suffix: -y, making it an adjective to a "nomen"or name of a good, matter or entity.
The word "thing" does not apply here, as the word thing is derived from the Germanic/Nordic word: thing (speak: t-hing) meaning meeting to settle disputes, retained in Germanic languages as tag or dag. Anyone summoned to such a meeting is entitled to field a champion, an advocate ( somebody "moving towards" = ad, "the call" = voca ). The word lawyer is not meant to mean: sage: but is derived from two words: law = legen ( German) leggen ( Dutch) = that which is laid down and the word: yer meaning the one knowing.
The Dutch word: dingen as a verb, and the singular: ding (equal to thing in English) actually mean: attempting to obtain by negotiation. Interestingly, the word: krijgen is used in Dutch, to obtain a matter as a warrior.
Personally, I am still not sure why the word negotiation (from Latin) is a negation. It presumes to negate a got / goti. The spanish use the word negocios to indicate conducting business. And especially when responding to an inquiry about how it's going: muchos negocios = Little freetime. Cicero uses the word in his writings but mentions the word business and leisure seperately. Let's just say that the search for the meaning is still ongoing.
What Black's Law shows is the gradual changing of the meaning of words. And of course, it is not to our advantage, as it drags us deeper into babble-language.
These days, the laws themselves give the meaning of words. But this is far from complete, since these are based on a framework where the meanings have already changed.