What is your best guess from best hopes to best guess from logic and fact?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (123)
sorted by:
reading the responses in this post and there is a shit ton of dooming going on. Nothing is going to happen? Seriously? Q said that the abuse of children would unite the left and right. This is about as sick as it gets.
It’s easy to see why it’s being dripped, too.
People have to be prepped to be receptive to hearing about ritual sex abuse of two year olds.
I think the public might be past having the info dripped to them.
They most likely have heard about it already, since they learned about "QAnon" (their word, not mine) during the pandemic.
And it's not like we haven't been blasting that information to them in online forums, for years.
I think it might be one of those things where the drip is done more for the purpose of the information flow to unreceptive people being more of a constant, ongoing exposure. So it’s more like a matter of doing it for long enough that those people eventually realize it’s actually the truth, and not just blow it off as bullshit, which would likely happen if it was just all of a sudden released in one batch. Idk if anyone else thinks the same but that’s how i’ve been thinking about it for a while now
When a woman who isn’t fully up to speed but knows there are shenanigans afoot asks you about Epstein and about details, and how bad it was, and you start to tell them, you will be met with disbelief, even now. Are you going to slap an innocent, naive woman in the face with full blown Pizzagate?
The dam IS cracking, but the break is some time ahead, yet. Maybe by this time next year. We’ll see.
In fact? Yes.
We are past letting people be willfully and blissfully ignorant. They have to know.
They don't IMO. I think the slow drip since the start of Q has been a detriment to the cause, but that's just me.
Id agree with you if not for one thing. Consider the actual size of corruption. Consider its influential legacy and reach built on decades of indoctrination. If we say the slow drip is a real plan then ask why. If they release things too soon and enough people still put their trust in these bad actors then we would have a large amount of people that are asleep and dismiss it as a "conspiracy theory". And a justice department that would aid that narrative. People have to be shown the whole picture before specific allegations against the heavy hitters can officially start. Atleast thats what i think
I agree in part because a lot of people ended up tuning out due to the landscape not changing in a way that's tangible to them. It just became easier to stop seeking the truth, because they have to struggle with finances, job searches/security, loss of friends or family due to X/Y/Z jab or issue.
It's a lot for people to take that in while they're already struggling with a ton of different stuff, so in that respect I do agree that the dripping has been a detriment.
There are times where it feels so slow that literally nothing happens for a significant period of time so people just end up talking in circles, though to be fair on that front there have been really good digs in those times of silence as well.
What matters, I suppose, is who at the end of this will still be listening. I think that number fluctuates up and down day to day, but I do believe that something big will end up pulling their attention that even the mainstream media can't avoid.
I agree but would add that the really sick stuff is not out yet. Having sex with a 16 year old or even a 13 year old is going to be akin to jaywalking by the end of this year IMO.
I don't think people are dooming, saying that the files being made public won't change anything. They're not saying that nothing will happen, legally speaking.
We're just talking about what will happen because the names were released to the public. Because the investigators and prosecutors have had that information all this time. It's not new to them.
Maybe it will sway some opinions this way or that with the public, but I don't think much will change. The public just really doesn't care much.
Interesting. As for Prince Andrew the age of consent in England is lower. The only time he was guilty is when he had intercourse with Virginia in the US. But even then, he probably has diplomatic immunity. This is all about the court of public opinion. This is where they are being tried. And considering what he’s lost already, he is gonna be toast.
I think we should remove the notion of diplomatic immunity. It just doesn't make any sense. You obey the laws of the country hosting you, period.
If you break your home country's laws while abroad, you should also be accountable.
We should neither extend nor expect diplomatic immunity and I am sincerely not sure why anyone thought that did anything but breed lawlessness.
I agree.