What is your best guess from best hopes to best guess from logic and fact?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (123)
sorted by:
They don't IMO. I think the slow drip since the start of Q has been a detriment to the cause, but that's just me.
Id agree with you if not for one thing. Consider the actual size of corruption. Consider its influential legacy and reach built on decades of indoctrination. If we say the slow drip is a real plan then ask why. If they release things too soon and enough people still put their trust in these bad actors then we would have a large amount of people that are asleep and dismiss it as a "conspiracy theory". And a justice department that would aid that narrative. People have to be shown the whole picture before specific allegations against the heavy hitters can officially start. Atleast thats what i think
I agree in part because a lot of people ended up tuning out due to the landscape not changing in a way that's tangible to them. It just became easier to stop seeking the truth, because they have to struggle with finances, job searches/security, loss of friends or family due to X/Y/Z jab or issue.
It's a lot for people to take that in while they're already struggling with a ton of different stuff, so in that respect I do agree that the dripping has been a detriment.
There are times where it feels so slow that literally nothing happens for a significant period of time so people just end up talking in circles, though to be fair on that front there have been really good digs in those times of silence as well.
What matters, I suppose, is who at the end of this will still be listening. I think that number fluctuates up and down day to day, but I do believe that something big will end up pulling their attention that even the mainstream media can't avoid.