I was drinking and used the wrong word. I should have said they're not "true" Hasidic jews. I was saying what one would have said in order to protect these jews.
An appeal to purity is commonly associated with protecting a preferred group. Scottish national pride may be at stake if someone regularly considered to be Scottish commits a heinous crime. To protect people of Scottish heritage from a possible accusation of guilt by association, one may use this fallacy to deny that the group is associated with this undesirable member or action. "No true Scotsman would do something so undesirable"; i.e., the people who would do such a thing are tautologically (definitionally) excluded from being part of our group such that they cannot serve as a counterexample to the group's good nature.[4]
But they're not "really" Hasidic jews.
? What would they be then?
I was drinking and used the wrong word. I should have said they're not "true" Hasidic jews. I was saying what one would have said in order to protect these jews.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_true_Scotsman
Children of the devil. John 8:44
Rev. 2:8b... I know about the slander of those who say they are Jews and are not, but are a synagogue of Satan.
Gotcha. I think this Jesus speaking only to/about the Pharisees, not all Israelites. But I see your interpretation.
God's Word is a living book, relevant at all times; not just a historical account of happenings.
The zionists hate you, and hate Christ. They're not your greatest ally.