Nope - she specifies that he was from a non-English speaking country, besides which she'd have been about 16 years too old and 98F too warm for Charles. My money's on one of the sons of that Dutch 'Queen' that just stepped down.
I think Charles will be on the list mainly because he was apparently telling prince william to prepare to be king. William pushed back, wanting to wait till his son was old enough to take the spot himself. WHY do either of those men push back on having the title???? Because they have been involved in dirty dealings and know they are close to loosing EVERYTHING. I bet william wishes he was harry about now…
Speaking of Harry - there have been bizarre stories about him and that thing he married, small-time failed actress and now failed princess Meghan Markle.
They say they have two children, but no one ever sees those kids. There are only a few fuzzy pictures usually taken from the back of their heads. The only clear pics seem to show very different kids even though they're supposed to be the same one. It's as though they were using models or stand-ins and passing them off as their own.
Best theory is that there are two kids, but Meghan used two surrogates and is not bio-related to either one. With surrogacy, the bio mother has to sign over the baby to be adopted by the "parents" but the story is that both surrogates (probably from Ukraine) refused to do that after seeing how whacko Meghan is and that Harry is in way over his head.
So, why does this matter? Because the names of the kids do appear in the Line of Succession (LoS) for the British crown. These people are highly, highly influential worldwide and it matters for the rest of us what happens there.
If those two lied about the kids, but let their names appear in the LoS, that's actually high treason on the books of Britain. Those kids have no birth certificates that anyone can find and no royal doctor signed off on the births, which is always, always done for children in the LoS.
They've been lying about this for over four years now and you have to wonder how much longer they can keep up that big of a lie.
I also wonder how much Harry really knows about what some of the family (like his father and uncles) have got up to, and I suspect he knows the truth about what happened to his mother.
Any psychopath's weapon of choice, when confronted, is to simply brand that person as "crazy" so that no one ever believes what they say. That's as true for the Deep State as it is for the individual.
That’s interesting about the kids. I haven’t paid attention to them but I’ll have to look. I wonder if there will even be a LoS. If everything is revealed I think the British people won’t want a monarchy. Regarding Harry, he was rebellious when he was young and I thought maybe because of what happened to Diana that he might be his own man but his interviews where Meghan did all the talking made him seem weak. I don’t know how strong I’d be if I was raised in a den of vipers but those who leave generally are. There’s a lot that has been hidden from us and I hope we get answers soon. Btw remember when Harry wore the nazi uniform to a Halloween party? Telling everyone who they really are.
My money's on Prince Charles - now King Charles and brother of Prince Andrew.
That would be one big BOOM if it's Charles.
Ole sausage fingers
Nope - she specifies that he was from a non-English speaking country, besides which she'd have been about 16 years too old and 98F too warm for Charles. My money's on one of the sons of that Dutch 'Queen' that just stepped down.
Probably a Saudi or Middle Eastern prince. Wouldn't that just bring it all together.
I think Charles will be on the list mainly because he was apparently telling prince william to prepare to be king. William pushed back, wanting to wait till his son was old enough to take the spot himself. WHY do either of those men push back on having the title???? Because they have been involved in dirty dealings and know they are close to loosing EVERYTHING. I bet william wishes he was harry about now…
Speaking of Harry - there have been bizarre stories about him and that thing he married, small-time failed actress and now failed princess Meghan Markle.
They say they have two children, but no one ever sees those kids. There are only a few fuzzy pictures usually taken from the back of their heads. The only clear pics seem to show very different kids even though they're supposed to be the same one. It's as though they were using models or stand-ins and passing them off as their own.
Best theory is that there are two kids, but Meghan used two surrogates and is not bio-related to either one. With surrogacy, the bio mother has to sign over the baby to be adopted by the "parents" but the story is that both surrogates (probably from Ukraine) refused to do that after seeing how whacko Meghan is and that Harry is in way over his head.
So, why does this matter? Because the names of the kids do appear in the Line of Succession (LoS) for the British crown. These people are highly, highly influential worldwide and it matters for the rest of us what happens there.
If those two lied about the kids, but let their names appear in the LoS, that's actually high treason on the books of Britain. Those kids have no birth certificates that anyone can find and no royal doctor signed off on the births, which is always, always done for children in the LoS.
They've been lying about this for over four years now and you have to wonder how much longer they can keep up that big of a lie.
I also wonder how much Harry really knows about what some of the family (like his father and uncles) have got up to, and I suspect he knows the truth about what happened to his mother.
Any psychopath's weapon of choice, when confronted, is to simply brand that person as "crazy" so that no one ever believes what they say. That's as true for the Deep State as it is for the individual.
That’s interesting about the kids. I haven’t paid attention to them but I’ll have to look. I wonder if there will even be a LoS. If everything is revealed I think the British people won’t want a monarchy. Regarding Harry, he was rebellious when he was young and I thought maybe because of what happened to Diana that he might be his own man but his interviews where Meghan did all the talking made him seem weak. I don’t know how strong I’d be if I was raised in a den of vipers but those who leave generally are. There’s a lot that has been hidden from us and I hope we get answers soon. Btw remember when Harry wore the nazi uniform to a Halloween party? Telling everyone who they really are.
Uhhhh, muh climate change…..
Alaweed al Talal