Choose your own interpretation but PLEASE: do not fall into Cancel Culture regarding an innocent trait of (possibly obsolete) humor.
This is as bad as what the dragon symbolizes in older story: sometimes we had to use this symbol to illustrate some real life danger. Keep every aware we live dangerous times and make these just grotesque enough not to scare the little ones too much.
Whoever did this to this 5 hundreds year old artefact is a moron.
Wow , thank you for letting us know and Sorry to hear this .
So this was similar to ripping down or destroying some of our historical statues in the US .
Swiss people are attached to 3 things: their families, their country and their traditions. Not all of us are bankers or satanic pedovores, but we like to humorously remind us that such people exist and should be not feared but exposed.
Sorry, but the statue is gross especially in light of what we know now about pedophilia, adrenochrome, human cannibalism, organ harvesting and those horrific human hunts the European Royals would go on!
I didn’t zoom in or hit the video until now, you can’t see the dude and his teeth or the baby until u do .
Late last night when I looked I didn’t even see the dude eating a baby !
I thought it was equivalent to our history statues being torn down. Damn that’s barbaric at best. I Understand history and it is sad that we are losing historical statues and other beautiful memories from time past , but eating babies / children naked or clothed is disgusting and a horror to look at even if it has nothing to do with pedo demonic stuff.
I couldn’t believe that pedovores were real even 3 years ago, now I know differently. Whatever the medieval meaning was or how parents applied it, I completely understand the hatred people have toward satanic cabalists.
Strange way to donit. It would not have been most people's take away when seeing it. It's not edifying any more than the crap put out by supposed artist. Also, thay shit cost money, who actually paid to have them made? Not the people theybwere intended to supposedly inform.
Switzerland is a land with a rigorous climate, Bern is near the Alps where survival was so hard back then that you can imagine how thick skinned people had to be.So they choose that ONE of their allegoric fountains was to depict a grotesque kid eater, remember these were the times when heretics would be burnt, so making a statue to have the parents mock their undisciplined kids is quit soft in this regard, isn’t it?
Germany warned about these same people via the original Grimm’s Fairy Tales. Those books feature all sorts of pedivorism, and it is definitely a warning. If it’s censored, people don’t learn about their tricks and existence.
It is definitely a double edged sword, but sometimes one is needed. Sometimes a mirror is needed. Sometimes permanent reminders are needed.
The danger of censoring even children’s sex books of Nazi Germany and this modern era is that people can forget the event or context (that [they] were teaching children to practice and normalize licentious sex), get to thinking “the Germans just hated free speech and burned dissenting opinions!” then let it all happen again. Get that crap away from the children, for certain, but find a way to preserve the memory and context of what these sick demons have done.
The horrible parts of history have to be worked into our story as a warning. The Bible didn’t omit King David having one of his soldiers murdered so he could schtupf his wife, and neither should we.
That would be silly. However, knowing what I do, I find it hard to look at books like the Water Babies without wondering if they are as innocent as they seem. Would such a statue be erected solely to control children? Hmmm.
This is not a satanic depiction: I know this because I live within a quarter mile of it.
This was a medieval carnival figure, something parents would show their kids to remember what could happen if they didn’t obey.
Check this.
Choose your own interpretation but PLEASE: do not fall into Cancel Culture regarding an innocent trait of (possibly obsolete) humor.
This is as bad as what the dragon symbolizes in older story: sometimes we had to use this symbol to illustrate some real life danger. Keep every aware we live dangerous times and make these just grotesque enough not to scare the little ones too much.
Whoever did this to this 5 hundreds year old artefact is a moron.
Wow , thank you for letting us know and Sorry to hear this . So this was similar to ripping down or destroying some of our historical statues in the US .
Yes, absolutely.
Swiss people are attached to 3 things: their families, their country and their traditions. Not all of us are bankers or satanic pedovores, but we like to humorously remind us that such people exist and should be not feared but exposed.
Nicely said !
Sorry, but the statue is gross especially in light of what we know now about pedophilia, adrenochrome, human cannibalism, organ harvesting and those horrific human hunts the European Royals would go on!
I didn’t zoom in or hit the video until now, you can’t see the dude and his teeth or the baby until u do . Late last night when I looked I didn’t even see the dude eating a baby ! I thought it was equivalent to our history statues being torn down. Damn that’s barbaric at best. I Understand history and it is sad that we are losing historical statues and other beautiful memories from time past , but eating babies / children naked or clothed is disgusting and a horror to look at even if it has nothing to do with pedo demonic stuff.
It wasn’t 500 years ago, especially because it belongs to a serie of these. Don’t fall into Cancellism.
No. I find the statue profoundly offensive.
I couldn’t believe that pedovores were real even 3 years ago, now I know differently. Whatever the medieval meaning was or how parents applied it, I completely understand the hatred people have toward satanic cabalists.
….and these were erected in Bern along the path of the Carnival processions to festively warn against the said satanic cabalists.
Strange way to donit. It would not have been most people's take away when seeing it. It's not edifying any more than the crap put out by supposed artist. Also, thay shit cost money, who actually paid to have them made? Not the people theybwere intended to supposedly inform.
Switzerland is a land with a rigorous climate, Bern is near the Alps where survival was so hard back then that you can imagine how thick skinned people had to be.So they choose that ONE of their allegoric fountains was to depict a grotesque kid eater, remember these were the times when heretics would be burnt, so making a statue to have the parents mock their undisciplined kids is quit soft in this regard, isn’t it?
Germany warned about these same people via the original Grimm’s Fairy Tales. Those books feature all sorts of pedivorism, and it is definitely a warning. If it’s censored, people don’t learn about their tricks and existence.
It is definitely a double edged sword, but sometimes one is needed. Sometimes a mirror is needed. Sometimes permanent reminders are needed.
The danger of censoring even children’s sex books of Nazi Germany and this modern era is that people can forget the event or context (that [they] were teaching children to practice and normalize licentious sex), get to thinking “the Germans just hated free speech and burned dissenting opinions!” then let it all happen again. Get that crap away from the children, for certain, but find a way to preserve the memory and context of what these sick demons have done.
The horrible parts of history have to be worked into our story as a warning. The Bible didn’t omit King David having one of his soldiers murdered so he could schtupf his wife, and neither should we.
To the pure all things are pure, to some - hidden in plain sight...
Then cancel all the known fairy tales because they depicts witches and ogers as well as kids and dragons.
That would be silly. However, knowing what I do, I find it hard to look at books like the Water Babies without wondering if they are as innocent as they seem. Would such a statue be erected solely to control children? Hmmm.
I can not bear to watch Tom Hanks movies anymore.
God is not the author of fear v to engage in producing fear is doing the wrong work.