The article is NOT about the increase in cancer since the jabs began.
It includes a chart showing a huge rise in many types of cancer for all age groups since 1975 (the start of the chart data).
In recent years, the rates of cancer for other age groups had been dropping, but since 1998, cancer rates for the 15 - 39 yr age group have gone up, and sharply.(no data for people under 15 years old). THAT is the focus of the article.
There is a notable uptick in cancer incidence among all age groups in the very last year of the chart (2020, it looks like) but that's not the focus of the article. The large cumulative change in cancer rates for young adults over the past 20+ years is the issue here.
Some doctors suspect that cancer-causing exposures might have started during patients’ childhoods, something that is difficult to trace. Unlike when smoking drove up lung cancer deaths in the 20th century, doctors suspect there isn’t a single carcinogen responsible for the current trends.
But there has also been a huge increase in childhood and even adult jabs since 1975. I think all jabs are linked to cancers. Hence also the clustering of pediatric cancers around regular booster dates.
I agree -- the massive increase in the insane "vaccine schedule" from birth right on thru childhood is a major factor in MANY health issues. Far from the only issue, of course.
They can't be this stupid:
“It’s likely some environmental change, whether it’s something in our food, our medications or something we have not yet identified.”
They actually used “baffled” in the article title. Amazing.
Either this is on purpose or they are completely clueless.
Jabs, and shedding of the jabs...as designed.
The doctors know exactly where the cancers are from. They are playing dumb to keep the financial gravy train rolling. GREED!
This. However, there is a degree of CYA involved in this also.
Don't forget Pfizer and AZ are buying up cancer drug makers too.
The article is NOT about the increase in cancer since the jabs began.
It includes a chart showing a huge rise in many types of cancer for all age groups since 1975 (the start of the chart data).
In recent years, the rates of cancer for other age groups had been dropping, but since 1998, cancer rates for the 15 - 39 yr age group have gone up, and sharply.(no data for people under 15 years old). THAT is the focus of the article.
There is a notable uptick in cancer incidence among all age groups in the very last year of the chart (2020, it looks like) but that's not the focus of the article. The large cumulative change in cancer rates for young adults over the past 20+ years is the issue here.
u/#q1010
Thank you, HoneyBaked -- another pede posted the same WSJ article and I posted a comment to it including mention of your Q-drop comment.
1010 has always been a favorite of mine; long, wide ranging, hard-hitting, and of course a bit cryptic. What does UK/GER [5 days] mean, I wonder?
https://greatawakening.win/p/17s5fen3TB/wsj-article-is-baffled-about-you/c/
But there has also been a huge increase in childhood and even adult jabs since 1975. I think all jabs are linked to cancers. Hence also the clustering of pediatric cancers around regular booster dates.
I agree -- the massive increase in the insane "vaccine schedule" from birth right on thru childhood is a major factor in MANY health issues. Far from the only issue, of course.
Post link is to archive.is but here is the WSJ link: https://www.wsj.com/health/healthcare/cancer-young-people-doctors-baffled-49c766ed
also archive.ph: https://archive.ph/GZXas
Today I saw a quack on Twitter trying to blame this on BLUE LIGHT and CIRCADIAN RHYTHM DISRUPTION.
Quack.