Not trying to be cute, dude, but, there are quite a lot of forks in that door. Bitcoin will be Bitcoin for now, but, these coins are 10 years from where the market will suddenly realize so they all compete Bitcoin
It's not about the name. Part of the takeover was the demonization of all opposing forks and the narrative that big blocks is destructive to decentralization which couldn't be further from the truth and yet to this day it is a verboten topic among bitcoiners.
If people go read the Bitcoin whitepaper today they are reading about Bitcoin Cash, not the software called BTC which has been radically altered.
Yes, that's what all blockchain upgrades are. Soft or hard forks. BTC and BCH are both forks of OG Bitcoin. But BCH works as originally intended by Satoshi, BTC does not.
Bitcoin Cash is Bitcoin.
It's a fork.
Yes, it's the side of the fork that preserved the original design of Bitcoin as described in the whitepaper.
Not trying to be cute, dude, but, there are quite a lot of forks in that door. Bitcoin will be Bitcoin for now, but, these coins are 10 years from where the market will suddenly realize so they all compete Bitcoin
What does this even mean?
Right... But for all intents and purposes, when people talk about Bitcoin, they're not referring to BCH.
It's not about the name. Part of the takeover was the demonization of all opposing forks and the narrative that big blocks is destructive to decentralization which couldn't be further from the truth and yet to this day it is a verboten topic among bitcoiners.
If people go read the Bitcoin whitepaper today they are reading about Bitcoin Cash, not the software called BTC which has been radically altered.
Yes, that's what all blockchain upgrades are. Soft or hard forks. BTC and BCH are both forks of OG Bitcoin. But BCH works as originally intended by Satoshi, BTC does not.