The claim that we own GameStop was made from calculations done on the number of shares that are held by the public v. the total number of shares. That the Apes "own" GME is true, from the perspective of legally purchased shares, which was the explicitly stated context in which it was said.
Obviously there is still fuckery in the closing of short sales and hiding the orders in dark pool ETFs. That's really the whole point of everything that is still going on. That is implicit within everything I said.
Well, there goes that one guy's whole writeup, then.
That was just a tiny part of the first section of the write up. It has nothing to do with the primary thesis of the report.
The report linked is specifically about HOW the House has created the system where they always win. That is why it is frustrating that it was mischaracterized with a premise it didn't have.
Everything I said is still relevant and was and is correct in the context in which I said it. Worse, suggesting that the statement that "we own it" was a premise or important point misses pretty much everything I said. Stating that the report is "old DD," implying it is false or irrelevant also completely misses everything I said.
There is nothing worse than being mischaracterized. I feel like I've been attacked by Fake News. :)
Well, there goes that one guy's whole writeup, then.
Claiming that "we own it" (GameStop).
The claim that we own GameStop was made from calculations done on the number of shares that are held by the public v. the total number of shares. That the Apes "own" GME is true, from the perspective of legally purchased shares, which was the explicitly stated context in which it was said.
Obviously there is still fuckery in the closing of short sales and hiding the orders in dark pool ETFs. That's really the whole point of everything that is still going on. That is implicit within everything I said.
That was just a tiny part of the first section of the write up. It has nothing to do with the primary thesis of the report.
I lived in vegas for 8 years, the house has the odds stacked. Banks, stocks all of it.
The report linked is specifically about HOW the House has created the system where they always win. That is why it is frustrating that it was mischaracterized with a premise it didn't have.
That's some old superstonk DD.
here is the complet library if anyone has a week to read it.
https://fliphtml5.com/bookcase/kosyg
Everything I said is still relevant and was and is correct in the context in which I said it. Worse, suggesting that the statement that "we own it" was a premise or important point misses pretty much everything I said. Stating that the report is "old DD," implying it is false or irrelevant also completely misses everything I said.
There is nothing worse than being mischaracterized. I feel like I've been attacked by Fake News. :)
Chillout have some popcorn.
Hodl.
You are good dude. Thanks for sharing it. If they can get it easier than us it's no good.
A guy claiming to be the author posts here. Goes by u/Slyver. Take it up with him.
So is it real or not? Did I waste my money buying one share of GME?
I doubt it, I have 800 in computershare myself.
But you just said they're all manipulated, including GameStop.
Which means it can't go TO THE MOON!, because they'd never let it.
So why hodl?