I actually leave room for the Moon landings being faked. The rants and unsupported evidence come up way short, however.
Certainly can make the case that the entire counter Psyop to the Space Program and Space X being fake and CGI is actually designed to shit all over the accomplishments of White Americans and sow total doubt of EVERYTHING.
Having watched the full footage, overlaid upon the curiosity I always had about how a tinfoil lined go-kart was able to deal with the “infinite vacuum of space”, the moon landings were almost certainly faked, but that doesn’t equate to “flat earth” or space being fake.
Space is 50/50.
It’s quite obvious something is going on in the sky.
NASA being Hebrew for “to deceive” (“Nasha”) and originally run by a Prussian Nazi doesn’t help anything.
Them being so weird about Antarctica doesn’t help anything, either.
There are legitimate appearing stories fitting both narratives that I can’t fully evaluate.
Even if they’re just getting rockets up really high with long-term floating / camouflaged payloads that don’t crash into the ground all the time, that’s still fairly impressive.
I am open to at least hearing an engaging argument for why the moon landing was fake, if only because it's an opportunity to engage in thought provoking discussion.
Flat earth shit on the other hand, there is not enough proof in the world -- not even sending them up themselves -- that would unscrew their heads from their ass.
I am aware this last bit is a touchy subject for some people, but frankly I don't care. There is endless proof that is easy to observe for the spheroidal planet.
But when it comes to the moon landing, there are a lot of questions that have popped up through the years that never really get properly answered, so my natural curiosity actually likes to hear the questions about it.
Personally, I believe we went. I'm not sure if the time we went is exactly the time we know, however. We have the laser reflector up there, yada yada so on so forth.
Firm (solid) ament (the thing that participated in the act of)
Plane -t (diminutive)
Uni- (one) -verse (turn of the plow, or furrow)
Radia (spoke of a wheel)
Di (two) mensio (thoughts) / dimensare (measurements)
Meter (a scheme in verse)
Metric (science of versification) (deals with time)
Allen is associated with 6s. Van (from)
Why have the wizenards of the divided knowledge cast these words among our spellings?
I’ve been increasingly leaning firmament, if only out of spite, but I’ll updoot your legitimate counter-counterpoint!
Stay skeptic and critical thinking of all, frens!
Same. Tho mentioning that here usually brings out the hordes and potential banning.
Especially OP here. Will post about it and then ban any dissenters. If you don't believe it, don't bring it up.
I actually leave room for the Moon landings being faked. The rants and unsupported evidence come up way short, however.
Certainly can make the case that the entire counter Psyop to the Space Program and Space X being fake and CGI is actually designed to shit all over the accomplishments of White Americans and sow total doubt of EVERYTHING.
Having watched the full footage, overlaid upon the curiosity I always had about how a tinfoil lined go-kart was able to deal with the “infinite vacuum of space”, the moon landings were almost certainly faked, but that doesn’t equate to “flat earth” or space being fake.
Space is 50/50. It’s quite obvious something is going on in the sky. NASA being Hebrew for “to deceive” (“Nasha”) and originally run by a Prussian Nazi doesn’t help anything. Them being so weird about Antarctica doesn’t help anything, either. There are legitimate appearing stories fitting both narratives that I can’t fully evaluate.
Even if they’re just getting rockets up really high with long-term floating / camouflaged payloads that don’t crash into the ground all the time, that’s still fairly impressive.
Haha nice downdoot, whoever did it. Sorry I have opinions and stated some reasons for them!
I am open to at least hearing an engaging argument for why the moon landing was fake, if only because it's an opportunity to engage in thought provoking discussion.
Flat earth shit on the other hand, there is not enough proof in the world -- not even sending them up themselves -- that would unscrew their heads from their ass.
I am aware this last bit is a touchy subject for some people, but frankly I don't care. There is endless proof that is easy to observe for the spheroidal planet.
But when it comes to the moon landing, there are a lot of questions that have popped up through the years that never really get properly answered, so my natural curiosity actually likes to hear the questions about it.
Personally, I believe we went. I'm not sure if the time we went is exactly the time we know, however. We have the laser reflector up there, yada yada so on so forth.
You have a lot to learn.
Do we not have a terrestrial telescope powerful enough to view the landing site?
Here is some evidence for speculation and scrutiny:
https://www.planetary.org/articles/3172?gad_source=1&gclid=EAIaIQobChMIyKa_mOLngwMVEIVaBR1bLAEzEAMYASAAEgI3YvD_BwE
https://centerforaninformedamerica.com/moondoggie-1/
The words for these things are interesting:
Firm (solid) ament (the thing that participated in the act of) Plane -t (diminutive) Uni- (one) -verse (turn of the plow, or furrow) Radia (spoke of a wheel) Di (two) mensio (thoughts) / dimensare (measurements) Meter (a scheme in verse) Metric (science of versification) (deals with time) Allen is associated with 6s. Van (from)
Why have the wizenards of the divided knowledge cast these words among our spellings?
Does this help to lock us into war, somehow?
It suffices that light speed is so darn slow. That's God's way of isolating planets in our universe.