Nikki Haley (Nimarata Nikki Haley (née Randhawa)) was born Jan. 20, 1972
Her father became a naturalized citizen on Oct. 18, 1977—five years after Nikki was born.
Therefore, Nikki’s father Ajit Singh Randhawa was NOT a natural born U.S. Citizen. He was born in Amritsar, Punjab, India.
Ajit Signh Randhawa. (Oct. 18, 1977). Petition for Naturalization, Cat. No. 2216867, Nikki Haley father. D.S.C., Columbia Division. Source:
https://www.ancestry.com/discoveryui-content/view/2805:2504
Click to access 1977-10-18-Ajit-Signh-Randhawa-Petition-for-Naturalization-Cat-No-2216867-Nikki-Haley-father-DSC-Columbia-Division-Oct-18-1977.pdf
Just curious - where is this legislation that says a 'natural born citizen' is one who has 'natural born citizen' parents?
Nimrod was born in South Carolina. That is a state in the USA. That makes her a natural born citizen.
As a means to protect the loyalty and allegiance to the USA, the framers of the Constitution required (Based on Vattel's Law of Nations) that both parents have to be citizens at the time of the child's birth.
Exactly.
Loyalty was the issue, which is why the office of President had a unique qualification.
And today, we see the effect of ignoring this.
Obama has ZERO loyalty to America, and in fact wants to destroy it from within.
This is the EXACT REASON why they put this clause in.
Vivek has no loyalty, either. He is only loyal to the globalists. Same thing you see with the non-British prime minister of UK and non-British mayor of London (both of whom look a lot like Vivek, BTW, and not like the British people).
People who are not loyal to the nation will SUBVERT AND DESTROY the nation.
Nope. Anchor baby citizenship is totally illogical. And has no basis in historic and Constitutional fact.
Not if her parents were not US Citizens.