Tucker — so now that SCOTUS lets us down, is MILITARY THE ONLY WAY?
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (52)
sorted by:
To be fair; If the roles were reversed; if a state like california was letting illegals flood in and the supreme court ruled the state could not because immigration is a federal matter; we'd all be cheering.
It's my understanding (based on a radio snip I heard, so correct me if I'm wrong) that the supremes essentially ruled that immigration is a federal matter, right?
Again; this could POTENTIALLY be a win, because when Trump gets in, in November....he will close that border tighter than crap & subsequent legal challenges SHOULD fail, based on this precedent.....
But I could be totally wrong.... I haven't read up on it much; just heard a blurb on the radio....
I read a comment to that effect on another post.. the author of the post was celebrating this because it paved (in their theory) the way for Trump to create sweeping immigration changes and do mass deportation.
A state ONLY has the right to STOP illegal immigration. States defer to the feds. If the feds or the state refuse to control the borders thenother has the right to do it. The feds only have the right to control it according to immigrarion law, not to let it run haywire and uncontrolled. Paxton actually used that as his argue ment amd the Supreme Court FAILED.
Now what? is all we need to ask.
Oh good, so maybe I'm not that far off....
Again; the ruling sucks, but also it doesn't; depends on the situation.
I would agree; it sounds like it absolutely could open the door for Trump to completely shut down the border & legal challenges SHOULD fall flat....!!
It's a federal matter until the feds defer to the states through inaction or what is happening now.
Oh absolutely. I completely agree the feds are guilt AF, of INTENTIONAL inaction & neglect.
Choosing to not do something, is still a choice, and often a deliberate one.
If I was in charge in any capacity in Texas, I'd tell the supremes:
"[They] have made their decision; now let them enforce it!"
Whilst immigration is a federal matter it also cant supersede states rights can it?
This was never a problem under a truly united states with people bonded over culturally agreed values.
There is a conflict at the heart of it between state and federal rights, but that wouldn't matter if both the people in government and the people of the states all agreed that protecting borders is paramount for a nation to exist let alone survive and letting in illegals which break the law by entering without permission in the first place, is a fucking CRIME which needs stopping!
This situation is the result of a destabilised and fractured nation, and exactly why the FFs said it's only a Republic IF you can keep it.
And currently, we haven't... :(