The entire situation is planned, performed, and orchestrated by White Hats. There is no other reason why it has turned into this seemingly impending civil war scenario.
First of all, I highly recommend watching this 15-minute clip of The Second Civil War, a 1997 HBO film that apparently was predictive programming for this exact event:
https://twitter.com/zrwj_/status/1749970163053814155?s=46&t=D7VSNbrQWTwJdnJ-_vaTRA
Who could have guessed they'd predict something like this?
So, Texas has secured their border, prevented Federal agents from returning to their posts, and defied every ruling and demand relating to it. At the same time, half of the states in America have voiced their support for Texas, with many sending NG and/or resources.
Meanwhile, Biden is backed into a corner on this. Either he orders the military (whether or not he controls it is beside the question) to recapture Shelby Park by force, thereby triggering a civil war and certain defeat by the angry majority, or he backs down, looking weak to every single democrat and bombing any chances of nomination.
Meanwhile, Abbott isn't even in America. He is in India, and while I haven't figured out exactly why he is over there, I think that right now it's safe to say he is talking about a potential Second Republic of Texas and trade deals with India.
Because the situation is deteriorating rapidly. Deadlines have been called and passed without consequence by both sides. Tensions are not going to simmer down since this is the hill Biden and the Marxist libtards will die on; unlimited illegal immigration.
This is the biggest self-checkmate ever by Biden. He allowed the border crisis to start, then panicked and did all the wrong things when Texas secured the border. There is no easy way out of this for Sleepy Joe. He got all turned around and lost his queen on the 5th move of the game.
Now for some quotes by normies that think that "QAnon" is bull, all from a 1500-member Discord server that is currently circlejerking this situation:
A: "Biden checkmated himself because of the border. He will literally die on the hill of unlimited illegal immigrants"
B: "Nah, Abbot checked him, then Biden simultaneously mated himself, whilst also giving up his queen."
A: "idk if Abbott is a genius or biden is a retard. this is the most spectacular display of real-politik manuvering ive ever seen"
B: "Both. Abbot played a genius move, and Biden started to screw himself more than anybody thought possible. Even the most hardcore rightoids never thought he could’ve made this situation as bad as it is."
A: "out of biden's current options:
1-Give up and look weak to his electorate
2-Economically sanction a US state
3-Use the military and spark a civil conflict
None of them were any good for him, imo chose the 2nd worst option"
C (a MAGA patriot): "Damn, the entire country hates me…what can I possibly do to solve this and make them give me absolute power?”
-FDR, Circa 1941"
These are fairly average people that if it were not for this crisis would be talking about history and science instead of civil war and Biden's massive self-own.
Have no fear. This crisis has ensured Biden's loss and Trump's victory.
Keep in mind whom our God is! Our God is an Awesome God, and He has an Awesome Divine Humor!
Nothing can stop what is coming. Hold the line, Patriots! Victory is this year!
Actually, all states have the right to leave the compact if the other party violates it. That's what a contract is. This shouldn't be necessary because the states are sovereign and they're beginning to understand that.
We are all getting a lesson in state sovereignty and Fed enumerated powers.
It goes back to 1832 when SC attempted to start the Civil War the first time by interfering with tariff collection by Fed gov’t in Port of Charelston SC. If it is delegated duty and Fed gov’t is doing its duty, then it cannot be re-delegated back to state via 9th/10th Amend. BS was stirred up to try and stop annulment of US Bank #2 charter, imo. Put down by Jackson (1st term): https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nullification_crisis
Actually, it goes back to the ratification of the Constitution. Both parties signed. Both agreed. Either signer/ratifier has the right to leave the contract....simple contract law.
Probably correct. So I believe the "contract" must be officially and legally terminated per contract law prior to secession for all states except Texas. "Breach of Contract" civil litigation is likely required in Article III court, i.e. SCOTUS.
I believe the Confederate States secession (except Texas) was intentionally done illegally (with Crown-controlled SC agents) in order to foment Civil War. It was intentional, not accidental. Theoretically, all Confederate states could have legally and properly terminated the contract, not engaged in any military action against the Union, and gone on their merry way. But this is not what the Crown wanted. The Crown was using divide and conquer strategy and they needed WAR, so they did everything possible to gin it up.
The most interesting aspect of the Civil War is that when the 11 states seceded, the original Amendment XIII TONA was automatically re-ratified as the percent of states remaining that had ratified it went over 75%, making it verifiably effective after 40 years of attempts to hide that it was fully re-ratified on January 30th, 1824 and incorporated into "Military Laws of the United States" in 1825. Amendment XIII TONA automatically strips citizenship if one takes any "emolument" from a foreign power. Applied today this strips all DC people, and all Corp State officials down to the city level of their REPUBLIC citizenship, automatically.
https://greatawakening.win/p/16b690DoWm/preview-confirmation-of-amendmen/
https://greatawakening.win/p/16aTa2w00Z/checkmate-deep-state-bitches-mil/c/
Not to be argumentative but I highly doubt that the courts really have any say in this and SCOTUS has proven many times that they aren't all that interested in giving constitutional OPINIONS. One of the most neglected and authoritative sources of what the Constitution actually says & means is the Ratification Debates. The founders preserved all discussions WHILE the Constitution was being written. Is it really any wonder that those Debates have been ignored? G.R. Mobley is quite an authority on those Debates.
A number of similarly inclined people have prepared a number of First Amendment petitions with stunning information in them. The first one (though now entitled 006), concerning the Dept. of Transportation, sets the stage for the rest of them. When this sleight of hand (done over several administrations) is understood, the whole mess becomes more easily dealt with. That petition is entitled, "Petition 006 Regarding Violations of the Constitution by the Federal Government in Operating the Department Of Transportation." Should you care to examine it, it can be found here: http://reclaimingtherepublic.org/petitions.html --the sixth doc in Word format.