Founding of America would not have happened had it not been for Russian Empire.
They paid very dearly for this. The Cabal holds very grudges for a long long time.
(Ever hear myths about how Snakes dont forget for a long time?)
The DS would have tried to bring both South and North under their control. I can't help but wonder if the world would have been a better place if the south had succeeded though. That's a topic if it's own. I think I'll make a post.
The DS would have tried to bring both South and North under their control.
They were already both under their control. Perhaps a little bit less, but then again, maybe not.
Perhaps the Civil War was a genuine war, as in, there really were two different controlling factions of the DS in charge. While my research suggests many of the really big wars were purely theatre (the vast majority of all wars for the past three centuries, including both world wars), I think it's possible that there may have been a few wars that were genuinely run by different entities at the top.
That everything is done in secret, that nothing is what it appears to be on the surface is for me at least beyond a reasonable doubt. Secret Societies have always run the world, and all our ideas of "what really happened in history" are completely illusory. In the example of the American Civil War, both sides were ultimately funded by the same entity (the Cabal). Lincoln and his family (son Robert Todd and his wife) have more direct ties to the Cabal than you can shake a Gettysburg Propaganda Speech..., err, Address at. But of course so does Jefferson Davis, the Czar of Russia, and literally every single person involved that history takes a note of (all members of the Aristocracy, many provably members of, or controlled by the Cabal).
There are so many Secret Societies that look like factions, and yet so many ties between those groups, including at their foundations, it's impossible to know. There are so many signs of Controlled Opposition, it's impossible to know. Yet there are some pieces of evidence that aren't obviously that; some pieces that suggest perhaps some true opposition in the factions. That there are always hidden hands guiding the story though, regardless of intent, is apparent all over the place. Assuming that we understand the real motives, actions, or affiliations of anything or anyone is foolish.
The North was ostensibly fighting about slavery, yet the amount of evidence that supports a different agenda is overwhelming, like ensuring that the States had no power, and the Federal Government was Sovereign over all. By all metrics, this consolidation of power was a truly great victory for the Rothschild's agenda. That they were funded by people with ties directly back to Rothschild is not difficult to show. However, those people are members of the American Aristocracy (including Rockefeller). While these members of the American Aristocracy had direct ties to Rothschild even then, it's not impossible it was still to some extent a faction war.
The South was ostensibly fighting over States Rights (to prevent such a Federal consolidation of power) yet they were so obviously funded and influenced by the Rothschilds that it is difficult to credit any alternative except that they were acting as their agent.
So it's not impossible it was a faction war (American Aristocracy v. the European Aristocracy), but it worked out so well for both sides (destruction of States Rights, a debt so large we are SILL trying to pay it off) that it's difficult to credit it as a true faction war.
I personally think the Civil War was, at the very top at least (overarching agenda), pure theatre. I think the American Revolutionary War was as well. Yet there are other wars that were almost certainly faction wars. Like, the Katanga (Congo) fiasco of 1960, or the Iran coup of 1954. Possibly the various Russian Revolutions of the late 1910s were faction wars as well. In each case there is evidence of benefits for both Rothschild and Rockefeller, where each side was working against each other vying for control of the resources. The overall narrative in each of these cases seems to have been according to a larger, joint design, but some of the details look like a faction war.
It isn't impossible that many wars fit into this duality of both "contrived theatre" and "a real faction war," depending on the scope you are looking at it. I think of this duality like a gang of thugs who mug a victim, and then the members of the gang fight over the spoils, except the fighting takes place in the planning stages of, and during the mugging, not after.
It's not impossible the Civil War falls into this category.
There is a long history of cooperation between Russia and the United States.
Russia interceded and actively resisted the British blockade of North America in league with a partnership of neutral parties including Sweden, France and Denmark. This led to England declaring war on the Danes in 1780. The Russian Navy was instrumental in breaking the blockade.
John Paul Jones, the father of the American Navy and one of the Revolutions great heroes, while retaining his American citizenship, served as a rear admiral in Catherine the Greats Black Sea navy, and captain of the flagship, fighting against the Turks.
A big consequence of the Bolshevik Revolution was the severing of these ties followed by 100 years of mistrust between these natural allies.
Russia, much like the rest of the old European countries, are our brothers - different enough in our language and culture, but we came from the same shared beginning (biblical). Just look at how pedowood has portrayed Russia/Germany consistently as our enemies...it's the same "Orange man bad" narrative parroting they do. Which makes sense when you think about it because the same people who control pedowood are the same people that control the central banks to finance the Brother Wars against us. Maybe we've been intentionally pitted against each other so that "small group of people" could gain the most from our destruction....?
Burning Bright from Badlands Media did a great series on Russia and our shared history with the US specifically. This is a great supplement to OP's video!
I heard they stopped outside powers from getting involved.
Founding of America would not have happened had it not been for Russian Empire. They paid very dearly for this. The Cabal holds very grudges for a long long time.
(Ever hear myths about how Snakes dont forget for a long time?)
This of course assumes that the North winning the war was a good thing.
The DS would have tried to bring both South and North under their control. I can't help but wonder if the world would have been a better place if the south had succeeded though. That's a topic if it's own. I think I'll make a post.
They were already both under their control. Perhaps a little bit less, but then again, maybe not.
Perhaps the Civil War was a genuine war, as in, there really were two different controlling factions of the DS in charge. While my research suggests many of the really big wars were purely theatre (the vast majority of all wars for the past three centuries, including both world wars), I think it's possible that there may have been a few wars that were genuinely run by different entities at the top.
That everything is done in secret, that nothing is what it appears to be on the surface is for me at least beyond a reasonable doubt. Secret Societies have always run the world, and all our ideas of "what really happened in history" are completely illusory. In the example of the American Civil War, both sides were ultimately funded by the same entity (the Cabal). Lincoln and his family (son Robert Todd and his wife) have more direct ties to the Cabal than you can shake a Gettysburg Propaganda Speech..., err, Address at. But of course so does Jefferson Davis, the Czar of Russia, and literally every single person involved that history takes a note of (all members of the Aristocracy, many provably members of, or controlled by the Cabal).
There are so many Secret Societies that look like factions, and yet so many ties between those groups, including at their foundations, it's impossible to know. There are so many signs of Controlled Opposition, it's impossible to know. Yet there are some pieces of evidence that aren't obviously that; some pieces that suggest perhaps some true opposition in the factions. That there are always hidden hands guiding the story though, regardless of intent, is apparent all over the place. Assuming that we understand the real motives, actions, or affiliations of anything or anyone is foolish.
The North was ostensibly fighting about slavery, yet the amount of evidence that supports a different agenda is overwhelming, like ensuring that the States had no power, and the Federal Government was Sovereign over all. By all metrics, this consolidation of power was a truly great victory for the Rothschild's agenda. That they were funded by people with ties directly back to Rothschild is not difficult to show. However, those people are members of the American Aristocracy (including Rockefeller). While these members of the American Aristocracy had direct ties to Rothschild even then, it's not impossible it was still to some extent a faction war.
The South was ostensibly fighting over States Rights (to prevent such a Federal consolidation of power) yet they were so obviously funded and influenced by the Rothschilds that it is difficult to credit any alternative except that they were acting as their agent.
So it's not impossible it was a faction war (American Aristocracy v. the European Aristocracy), but it worked out so well for both sides (destruction of States Rights, a debt so large we are SILL trying to pay it off) that it's difficult to credit it as a true faction war.
I personally think the Civil War was, at the very top at least (overarching agenda), pure theatre. I think the American Revolutionary War was as well. Yet there are other wars that were almost certainly faction wars. Like, the Katanga (Congo) fiasco of 1960, or the Iran coup of 1954. Possibly the various Russian Revolutions of the late 1910s were faction wars as well. In each case there is evidence of benefits for both Rothschild and Rockefeller, where each side was working against each other vying for control of the resources. The overall narrative in each of these cases seems to have been according to a larger, joint design, but some of the details look like a faction war.
It isn't impossible that many wars fit into this duality of both "contrived theatre" and "a real faction war," depending on the scope you are looking at it. I think of this duality like a gang of thugs who mug a victim, and then the members of the gang fight over the spoils, except the fighting takes place in the planning stages of, and during the mugging, not after.
It's not impossible the Civil War falls into this category.
There is a long history of cooperation between Russia and the United States.
Russia interceded and actively resisted the British blockade of North America in league with a partnership of neutral parties including Sweden, France and Denmark. This led to England declaring war on the Danes in 1780. The Russian Navy was instrumental in breaking the blockade.
John Paul Jones, the father of the American Navy and one of the Revolutions great heroes, while retaining his American citizenship, served as a rear admiral in Catherine the Greats Black Sea navy, and captain of the flagship, fighting against the Turks.
A big consequence of the Bolshevik Revolution was the severing of these ties followed by 100 years of mistrust between these natural allies.
First from the Russian perspective:
https://russiancouncil.ru/en/blogs/alexey-viryasov/how-russia-saved-the-united-states-twice/
And an American source:
https://allthingsliberty.com/2015/09/russia-and-the-american-war-for-independence/#google_vignette
Russia, much like the rest of the old European countries, are our brothers - different enough in our language and culture, but we came from the same shared beginning (biblical). Just look at how pedowood has portrayed Russia/Germany consistently as our enemies...it's the same "Orange man bad" narrative parroting they do. Which makes sense when you think about it because the same people who control pedowood are the same people that control the central banks to finance the Brother Wars against us. Maybe we've been intentionally pitted against each other so that "small group of people" could gain the most from our destruction....?
Burning Bright from Badlands Media did a great series on Russia and our shared history with the US specifically. This is a great supplement to OP's video!
https://burningbright.substack.com/p/righteous-russia-part-0-enemy-of?s=r